The European Central Bank takes centre stage but will it do more than posture? And Chinese inflation worries emerge

After the furore which has surrounded the Euro zone and its peripheral economies the last few days and indeed weeks I wish to return to another subject which is bubbling away in the background. That subject is China and how much she can grow without generating more inflation. As I reported on the 11th of November her stock market has become increasingly nervous that policy will have to be tightened further to try to control inflation. These fears were exacerbated on Monday when attention was focused on the 7 day repo rate which had risen from 2.7% to 3.3% over the past fortnight leading to fears of more general rate hikes. In response to this the Shanghai Composite stock index fell by 1.3%. This morning we have seen further news on that front with the latest Purchasing Managers Index for China rising from 54.7 to 55.2 which means that it has now risen for four months in a row. Whilst this is good news in itself eyes will be turning to the input prices measure which was strong. In response to this the stock market did not move much but it has fallen considerably since it closed at 3159 on the 8th of November to 2823 today or a fall of 10.6%. Any weak numbers lead to fears of a slowdown and any stronger ones lead to fears of inflation. Not quite fair,perhaps, but that appears to be the state of play right now. As the rest of the world is hoping for some economic growth from China these developments are troubling for us all.

Inflationary Trends: The State of Play

If you look at the indices which give us an idea of inflationary trends then at first look you may feel that the problem has reduced recently. For example the CRB commodity spot index has drifted back from around 502 to 484 and the crude oil price ( West Texas Intermediate) has fallen from a recent closing high of 87.87 to just under 84 US dollars per barrel. So consumers in US dollars will have seen a slowdown in some inflationary trends. The problem for everyone else is that most commodities are priced in US dollars and so their price depends on their exchange rate for dollars. Over the same time period the US dollar index which is trade weighted has risen from 77.5 to 81.27 for an overall rise of 4.6% so on this basis allowing for exchange rate fluctuations for non-US dollar consumers commodity prices will have edged up slightly. Not perhaps quite what you expected but a clear dichotomy between those who consume in US dollars and those who do not.

If we consider the Euro zone then the recent sharp fall in the Euro from around 1.40 to 1.306 or 6.7% will led to inflationary trends from commodity price rises as they feed in assuming the Euro stays at this sort of level. This will have many different effects from the extreme of Greece where consumer price inflation is 5.5% to the other extreme of Ireland where her two measures are either side of zero.

Longer-term interest rates: Safe haven status for the UK and US?

As the storm has whipped around the Euro zone it would appear that two nations have acquired “safe haven” status in terms of their interest rates. The ten-year gilt or UK government bond rallied by one point yesterday reducing its yield by 0.12% to 3.22%. Government bond yields fell too in the United states with the ten-year falling to 2.81% and the thirty-year to 4.11% for falls of around half that of the UK. Putting this another way and looking at the spread between German ten-year bunds and UK gilts it narrowed by 0.05% yesterday. So considering each countries own problems something of a surprising result as UK inflationary trends point to a rather different ten-year yield in my view, but nonetheless there they are.

The European Central Bank has uncomfortable choices ahead of it

The Head of the European Central Bank spoke yesterday and some consider that his speech was a threat to the markets and a promise of further action. Having read it I am not sure if this is a promise or mere bluster but tomorrow afternoon we will find out. The particular phrase which had pundits wondering was this.

pundits are under-estimating the determination of governments

Actually I have always thought that Euro zone politicians are completely committed to the Euro but that problems have arisen because of the flaws in its construction and indeed in their responses to the consequences of the flaws. But it leads to the question of what can the ECB do?

The Current Position

In terms of current policies the ECB has an official interest rate of 1% and is providing quite a lot of liquidity in the short-term mostly these days in the up to 3 month maturity. It has been reducing some of its liquidity operations with a clear change coming in July when twelve month repos were ended.However some banking systems such as Portugal,Greece, Ireland and Spain have become very reliant on ECB liquidity with for example the main 6 Irish domestic institutions being provided with somewhere around 90 billion Euros worth. In effect it is propping up the financial systems in these countries and an example of this is that the last bond issue from a company domiciled in Spain, Portugal or Ireland came from Iberdrola, the Spanish utility, on October 6,according to the Financial Times. So the ECB is actively operating as a lender of last resort in these countries. However it does currently plan to exit such strategies with most of the exiting to be done on current plans over the next couple of months.

In addition over the period of the credit crunch the ECB has purchased assets to support markets. In an earlier stage of the crisis it conducted a Covered Bond Purchases programme of some 60.9 billion Euros to support that market as part of policies which Mr. Trichet felt were more effective than Quantitative Easing.Since the announcement of the shock and awe package on May 10th it has under its Securities Markets Programme been buying mostly government bonds in the peripheral Euro zone nations. Last week it announced purchases of 1.3 billion Euros making the total some 67.2 billion Euros. Thus it is holding some 128.1 billion of assets on its books.

What could it now do?

There are two moves which are most likely.

1. Rather than pursuing an exit strategy the ECB announces that all current monetary measures will remain in place well into 2011. If it wished to be more aggressive it could announce new 6 month repos which would allow banks in the peripheral nations some certainty of funding. Even more aggressive but less likely would be to have a new 12 month repo as this would allow these same banks to load up on cash (and use it to buy government bonds).

2. It could expand the size of purchases of debt under the Securities Markets Programme. Last week’s purchases at 1.3 billion Euros were higher than recent amounts but look dwarf like when compared with the 16 billion of the first week and the 10 billion of the second week. When I wrote yesterday about the way Greek bond yields fell after May 10th part of the reason for this was the size of the purchases by the ECB. ( There was also a discussion on the comments section about the treatment of these assets in terms of accountancy, I would just like to add that there must be at this time considerable losses on all 26 billion purchases in the first two weeks on a “mark to market” basis).

A More Aggressive Alternative

This would be to openly conduct a Quantitative Easing programme in the way that the UK or US has. So the ECB would set out a target number of purchases of Euro zone government bonds and start to buy them. The amounts required are likely to be higher than before as larger bond markets have become involved, for example Spanish government debt is around 550 billion Euros.


The choices in front of the ECB are quite plain and let us be clear that they will be unpalatable to some of the Governing Council. The President of the German Bundesbank Axel Weber has recently given speeches praising the ECB’s exit strategy and he has always been against the asset purchases under the Securities Markets Programme. So there will be a debate and some dispute but both measures I suggest are likely so that we may see an extension of liquidity provision and a possible expansion of the SMP.

The real issue with these as policies is that they suppress the symptoms but do not provide a cure. If you keep extending liquidity what is your end-game? Also you can buy these assets but who do you eventually plan to sell them too? Or when they mature who will replace the funding? Someone along that road the ECB is in my opinion exceeding its authority. It is not its role to fund governments and slowly but surely an expansion of the SMP would lead it to taking on such a role. One day European taxpayers will wake up and make enquiries as to what the ECB is doing with the credit card their politicians are supplying it with.

As to full Quantitative Easing I do not expect that tomorrow as it is likely to be a step too far for much of the ECB.There is the obvious flaw that there is no common fiscal policy in the Euro zone. But even here care is needed because only 4 days before asset purchases started under the SMP the ECB denied it had even discussed the matter leading to the suspicion the Europe’s politicians had overruled the ECB. If they can do it once….

At this point we see the impotence of conventional monetary policy. The ECB could announce an interest rate cut but I cannot see this doing any good at all.


Late last night to a crescendo of stable doors closing Standard and Poors announced this.

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services today said it placed its ‘A-’ long-term and ‘A-2′ short-term foreign and local currency sovereign credit ratings on the Republic of Portugal on CreditWatch with negative implications.

There was also an interesting development in the statement as to why this move was taking place.

However, we see the government as having made little progress on any growth-enhancing reforms to offset the fiscal drag from these scheduled 2011 budgetary cuts. In particular, we believe that policies the government has pursued have done little to boost labor flexibility and productivity. As a consequence of the Portuguese economy’s structural rigidities and the volatile external conditions, we project that the economy will contract by at least 2% in 2011 in real terms.

So as well as austerity the ratings agencies now want growth enhancing reforms which is something of a change. I also note the very downbeat view on Portuguese economic growth for next year.


At its meeting tomorrow the European Central Bank has some difficult choices to make. It is not easy setting monetary policy for 16 rather disparate nations and each possible solution brings with it a set of problems. In virtually every case the essential problem is that they all involve an element of “kicking the can down the road” and I think that markets and indeed the Governing Council are increasing wonderingly what is the way out of this and what are the future implications of prospective moves? So the period in which it could make such moves almost scot-free is over.

In many ways the failures of Euro zone politicians have passed the economic baton to the ECB which in my view does not have the tools for the task. An example of this is back in the years of the previous decade when its compromise on interest-rates led to them being at levels which stoked property booms in Ireland and Spain in particular.

The one move which would improve things in the longer-term which is some form of debt restructuring is not within their control.


7 thoughts on “The European Central Bank takes centre stage but will it do more than posture? And Chinese inflation worries emerge

  1. Thanks again for an interesting read. I came across a few articles earlier in the year that raised the question of whether China has already reached its ‘Lewis Turning Point’, and how this could be particularly bad news in combination with loose global monetary policy…

    The Euro question is clearly the big issue at the moment though. I agree that debt writedowns are inevitable at some point, but doubt that this would be enough to solve the Eurozone’s problems. I think there are two additional fundamental problems. Firstly, the currency is too strong for a majority of member states – it would be more reasonable to meet in the middle and aim for a currency that behaved like the old franc rather than the D-mark. Secondly, more must be done to facilitate convergence, which inevitably means more fiscal transfers in addition to improving discipline in the peripherals. FInally, restructuring of peripheral debt would create financial turmoil, so it would have to be worked out in advance and unveiled with simultaneous financial sector bail-outs. The EFSF would be the obvious choice for this – the name does include the words ‘Financial Stability’, after all! Perhaps if the ECB helps out peripheral banks in the short term, then the EFSF could swap peripheral bonds deposited at the ECB for EFSF guaranteed bonds to give back to the banks.

    This brings me to a question I have about central bank bond purchases and QE. Do you think the Fed, the BoE and the ECB care about the price they pay for the bonds they purchase during these programs? When the Fed says it will do $600 bn of QE, does it purchase $600 bn of bonds, or does it, rather, use $600 bn of QE money to purchase however many treasuries this will buy it? Do you think Ben Bernanke is cursing the rising price of treasuries at the moment due to ‘safe haven’ flows? (and do you think he tried to play psychological games with expectations in advance of QE2 in order to reduce the cost of purchases?!)

    • “…it would be more reasonable to meet in the middle and aim for a currency that behaved like the old franc rather than the D-mark.” Well, it may be that some of us have shorter memories than others? The old French Franc was not a currency which any responsible central bank (other than that of Zimbabwe) would want to emulate. Inflation due to reckless government spending was so bad in France that they had to completely re-issue their currency with a multiple running into a considerable number of zeros, called the “New Franc” at the time, which was that converted into the Euro . I don’t think the Germans would agree to emulate that economic disaster, and some other countries in the Eurozone might not be too keen either!

  2. Hi Shaun.. can you explain these repo operations in plain english ? For example, it’s been known that Santander and BBVA purchase Spanish Govt Bonds, and then turn right around and “repo” them to the ECB.. what’s this all about ? Seems to me that this is ECB monetization done thru a 3rd party bank.. or no ?

    • Hi Mr.K
      The ECB has had various names for this sort of thing but usually repo is short for repurchasing operation and we can define it thus.

      “The process of borrowing money by combining the sale of an asset (usually a fixed income security) with the subsequent repurchase of that same asset for a slightly higher price (which reflects the borrowing rate). ”

      So the bank deposits the bond with the ECB for a period and in return gets cash and could therefore use this cash to buy more bonds and deposit them at the ECB and so on.

      Now if we think back to when there were 12 month repos of unlimited size if you were a bank you could buy higher yielding bonds aka Peripheral government bonds and then repo them at the ECB. Why would you do that? Well it costs you 1% but in return the bond might yield 4 or 5%. So if you matched terms you could have an almost pure arbitrage if you buy a one year bond and deposit it at the ECB, although yields were lower for shorter-dated bonds. You might be willing to do that all day but in practice would be limited by the capital of your bank or at least you should be…

      It is a type of monetisation and it can also be a source of relatively easy profit for the banks, although in practice some over-egged the pudding and made losses from it.

      Were there to be another 12 month repo this would currently look very attractive as there is an Irish one year bond yielding around 4.75% as of last nights close. So you could match the term and borrow at one per cent and receive 4.75% and have Ireland backed by the EU/IMF. Suddenly trading looks an easy game…

      There are haircuts on some bonds now but I have left those out just to keep the example relatively clean and simple.

  3. Mr Trichet said on 31 May

    ” The Treaty prohibits the direct purchase by the ECB of debt instruments from governments. We are buying bonds on the secondary market only, and we stick to the principles of the Treaty, which are price stability, our primary mandate, and central bank independence. Since our inception, we have always called upon governments to respect budgetary discipline. We had a lot of difficulty with several governments during the last ten years, both as regards their own national responsibilities and as regards their collegial responsibilities of peer surveillance in the Eurogroup. This period is over. We expect from governments strict respect for the principle of budgetary discipline and effective mutual surveillance.

    The purchases made on the secondary market cannot be used to circumvent the fundamental principle of budgetary discipline. The Securities Markets Programme strictly aims at correcting malfunctioning of markets.”

  4. I recommend everyone reads a book called “when money dies” as it gives a rather sobering account of why Germany may not wish to weaken its currency or undertake QE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s