The credit crunch era has been essentially one where central banks have tried to borrow spending and resources from the future. In essence this is a Keynesian idea although their actual methods have had Friedmanite style themes. We were supposed to recover economically meaning that the future would be bright and we would not even notice that poor battered can on the side of the road as we cruised past it. Some measures have achieved this.
Indeed some central banks are involved in directly buying stock markets as these quotes from the Bank of Japan this morning indicate.
BOJ’s Kuroda: ETF buys are aimed at risk premiums, not stock prices. Overall ETF holdnig small proportion of overall equity ( DailyFX).
Some think it has had an impact.
Nikkei avg receiving an agg boost of c.1,700 points after curr ETF policy was adopted. The Nikkei average added 2,150 points in fiscal 2016 ( @moved_average )
Such moves were supposed to bring wealth effects and in a link to the retail sales numbers higher consumption. This would be added to by the surge in bond markets which is the flip side of the low and in many cases negative yields we have and indeed still are seeing. This is why central bankers follow financial markets these days so that they can keep in touch with something they claim is a strong economic boost. In reality it is one of the few things they can point to that have been affected and on that list we can add in house prices.
I am using that word broadly to consider younger people in general and they have much to mull. After all they are unlikely to own a house – unless the bank of mum and dad is in play – so do not benefit here. In fact the situation is exactly the reverse as prices must look even more unaffordable of which one sign this week has been the news that more mortgages are now of a 35 year term as opposed to 25 years.
They also face a rather troubling picture on the pension front. From the Financial Times.
People entering the workforce today face a “monumental savings challenge”, the International Longevity Centre-UK said in a report published on Thursday. According to the report, young workers in the UK will need to put away 18 per cent of their earnings each year in order to have an “adequate retirement income” — a higher proportion of their earnings than their counterparts in any other OECD country. Adequate retirement income is defined as around two-thirds of a person’s average pre-retirement salary.
To my mind the shock is not in the number which is not far off what it has always been. Rather it comes from finding that after student loan repayments and perhaps saving for a house which comes after feeding yourself, getting some shelter ( rent presumably) and so on. Of course some will feel that their taxes are financing the triple-lock for the basic state pension which is something which for them is getting ever further away. From the BBC.
UK state pension age increase from 67 to 68 to be brought forward by seven years to 2037, government says.
There were two clear issues with this. The first is the irony that this came out as the same time as a report suggested that gains in lifespan are fading. The other is the theme of a good day to bury bad news as the summer lull and the revelations about BBC pay combined.
Oh and tucked away in the Financial Times report was something that will require a “look away now” for central bankers.
A combination of low investment returns
You see those owning equities and government bonds have had a party but where are the potential future gains for the young in buying stock and bond markets at all time highs?
UK Retail Sales
This has not been one of the areas which has disappointed in the credit crunch era. If we look at today’s release we see that in 2010.11 and 12 not much happened as they were 98-99% of 2013’s numbers. Then something of a lift-off occurred as they went 104% (2014), 108.5% (2015), and 113.8% (2016). This fits neatly with my views on the Bank of England Funding for Lending Scheme as we see that a boost to the housing market and house prices yet again feeds into consumer demand. Actually to my mind that overplays the economic effect of FLS as it may have provided a kick-start but the low inflation levels as 2015 moved into 2016 provided the main boost via higher real wages in my opinion.
What happened next?
The first quarter of 2017 saw the weakest period for UK retail sales for a while with several drivers. One was the nudge higher in inflation provided by the lower value for the UK Pound £. Another was that the numbers could not keep rising like they were forever! Let us now look at today’s release.
In the 3 months to June 2017, the quantity bought (volume) in the retail industry is estimated to have increased by 1.5%, with increases seen across all store types…….Compared with May 2017, the quantity bought increased by 0.6%, with non-food stores providing the main contribution.
As to what caused this well as summer last time I checked happens every year it seems the weather has been looked at favourably for once.
Feedback from retailers suggests that warmer weather in addition to the introduction of summer clothing helped boost clothing sales.
If you recall last autumn we got a boost from ladies and women purchasing more clothes, is their demand inexhaustible and do we own them another vote of thanks?
Also I note that better numbers have yet again coincided with weaker inflation data.
Average store prices (including petrol stations) increased by 2.7% on the year following a rise of 3.2% in May 2017; the fall is a consequence of slowing fuel prices.
Or to be more specific less high inflation.
If we look at the retail sales data we have Dr. Who style returned to the end of 2016.
The growth for Quarter 2 (Apr to June) 2017 follows a decline of 1.4% in Quarter 1 (Jan Mar) 2017, meaning we are broadly at the same level as at the start of 2017.
Unlike many other sectors it has seen a recovery and growth in the credit crunch era. In addition to the factors already discussed no doubt the rise in unsecured credit has also been at play. For the moment we see that it will provide a boost to the GDP numbers in the second quarter as opposed to a contraction in the first.
But there are issues here as we look ahead. With economic growth being slow we look for any sort of silver lining. But of course the UK’s reliance on consumption comes with various kickers such as reliance on an ever more affordable housing market and poor balance of payments figures.
Also from the perspective of millennials there is the question of what they will be able to consume with all the burdens bearing down on them? Mankind has seen plenty of period where economic growth has stagnated as for example the Dark Ages were not only called that because of the weather. But we have come to expect ever more growth which currently looks like quite a hangover for them. They need the equivalent of what is called “something wonderful” in the film 2001 A Space Odyssey like cold nuclear fusion or an enormous jump in battery technology. Otherwise they seem set to turn on the central bankers and all their promises.