The beat of UK economic data goes on as our official statisticians do their best to flood us with it on certain days which sadly has the effect that some matters get missed. It is sadly to report that those at the top of the Office for National Statistics have rather lost the plot and if the evidence they gave to the recent parliamentary enquiry is any guide are prioritising chasing clicks rather than providing information. The labour market release which used to be fairly clear is now something of a shambles of separate releases.
Let us however buck the trend by looking at the numbers which give us an international comparison for our national debt and deficit. Regular readers will be aware that the UK ONS has its own methodology which is neither international nor understood much as I recall Stephanie Flanders when she was BBC economics editor suddenly realising some of the reality. Let me illustrate with the numbers.
At the end of December 2018, UK general government gross debt was £1,837.5 billion, equivalent to 86.7% of gross domestic product (GDP) . This represents an increase of £51.4 billion since the end of December 2017, although debt as a percentage of GDP fell by 0.4 percentage points from 87.1% over the same period. This fall in the ratio of debt to GDP implies that GDP is currently growing at a greater rate than government debt.
That quote does a fair job of explaining how the debt is now rising at a slower rate than economic output meaning it is rising in absolute terms but falling in real ones.
If we move to the annual deficit we see this.
In 2018, UK general government deficit was £32.3 billion, equivalent to 1.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) ; the lowest annual deficit since 2001. This represents a decrease of £5.8 billion compared with borrowing in 2017.
In the financial year ending March 2018, the UK government deficit was £43.3 billion (or 2.1% of GDP), a decrease of £3.0 billion compared with the previous financial year.
As you can see the pattern is familiar of a falling deficit and if we start with the deficit there is something of an irony as we note this.
This is the second consecutive year in which government deficit has been below the 3.0% Maastricht reference value.
Although in debt terms we are way over.
General government gross debt first exceeded the 60% Maastricht reference value at the end of 2009, when it was 63.7% of GDP.
Rather confusingly the ONS points us towards the January so let us look at the deficit in tax year terms.
Borrowing in the financial year ending (FYE) March 2018 was £41.9 billion, £3.0 billion less than in FYE March 2017; the lowest financial year for 11 years (since FYE 2007).
So only a small difference here but the debt figures show a much wider one in absolute terms.
Debt (public sector net debt excluding public sector banks) at the end of January 2019 was £1,782.1 billion (or 82.6% of gross domestic product (GDP))
The two main differences are the switch from net to gross debt and the switch from public finances to central government which means a difference of around 4% of GDP.
But we see that the numbers still show a considerable improvement.
Retail Sales
The present upbeat springlike mood got an extra boost this morning from this.
The monthly growth rate in the quantity bought in March 2019 increased by 1.1%, with food stores and non-store retailing providing the largest contributions to this growth. Year-on-year growth in the quantity bought increased by 6.7% in March 2019, the highest since October 2016, with a range of stores noting that the milder weather this year helped boost sales in comparison with the “Beast from the East” impacting sales in March 2018.
The weather probably helped as noted and in case you were wondering the numbers are seasonally adjusted for Easter. But as I noted value growth of 7.3% that meant that a rough guide to inflation is 0.6% or my January 2015 theme has worked one more time.
However if we look at the retail-sectors in the UK,Spain and Ireland we see that price falls are so far being accompanied by volume gains and as it happens by strong volume gains. This could not contradict conventional economic theory much more clearly. If the history of the credit crunch is any guide many will try to ignore reality and instead cling to their prized and pet theories but I prefer reality ever time. ( January 29th 2015)
This poses quite a problem for central bankers as they want to push inflation back to and in some cases ( as we have recently analysed) above 2% per annum. This would weaken retail sales and other measures as the reduce real wages by doing so. Or if you prefer they would be ignoring the reality of “sticky wages” and preferring Ivory Tower theory. Maybe that is why they seem keener on targeting climate change than inflation these days as we are deflected away from their main job.
As this series is erratic on a monthly basis we need to run a check looking further back but when we do so the answer changes little.
In the three months to March 2019 (Quarter 1), the quantity bought in retail sales increased by 1.6% when compared with Quarter 4 (Oct to Dec) 2018, following sustained growth throughout the first three months of the year. All store types except department stores and household goods stores increased in the quantity bought in the three months to March 2019, when compared with the previous three months.
It seems that the UK consumer has not waited to spend the benefits of higher real wages. At least for once we may not be observing a debt financed splurge although this does on the downside pose a worry about the trade figures, especially if this morning’s PMI survey suggesting economic growth has slowed again in the Euro area is accurate.
Putting this into song it is time for the Spencer Davis Group.
So keep on running
Keep on running,
Comment
As we approach Easter on Maundy Thursday we see that much of the UK economic data is in tune with the spring and the warm sunny weather that has arrived in London. This week has seen mostly steady inflation with continuing wage and employment growth and now has retail sales on a bit of an apparent tear. This is reinforced by the delayed debt and deficit data that matches international standards. Of course the economic output or GDP data is much more sanguine as we wait to see which will be right.
All of these numbers have their flaws. If we take an even-handed view we see that the omission of the self-employed from the wages numbers is a handicap but on the other side the omission of frankly a fair bit of modern life with things like Whatsapp being free and not being in GDP is a rising problem there.
Let me wish you a happy Easter as the UK takes a long weekend and add something else. Next month Japan will take a long break due to the accession of a new Emperor as what is called Golden Week becomes more like a Golden Fortnight. Some seem to approach this with trepidation, has the control freakery become so high, it has come to this?
Taken to dizzy new heights
Blinding with the lights, blinding with the lights
Dizzy new heights
Has it come to this?
Original pirate material
Your listening to the streets ( The Streets)
Me on The Investing Channel
Once again official figures fly in the opposite direction of footfall (which is down) so I’d suggest that a) the regional effects will be large and b) won’t last. On the anecdotal front I know a fair few people who have had no wage increase for 10 years barring promotions.
I’m also glad your 2015 thesis is holding up, you could become what Fisher is to interest rates if you keep this up!
Hi bill40
The various different measures of retail sales in the UK rarely correlate such that it is more of a surprise if they do than don’t. So I was’t that bothered when the British Retail Consortium reported this.
“Retail sales slowed in March, even when the Easter distortions were accounted for, as greater uncertainty caused people to hold off from splashing out…….“March marked a truly disappointing end to the first quarter of 2019 for retailers. Not only did total sales fall 0.5 per cent compared to the same month last year, but no further clarity around Brexit came to light, and shoppers continue to waiver.”
Of course we do not know that the BRC are wrong as we do our best to pick our way through the statistical minefield.
Couple of issues with increase in retail sales and “real wages” :
Retail sales figures could have been boosted by stockpiling due to Brexit uncertainty, but the High Street in a dismal state Debenhams entered administration lately and the John Lewis Partership sales down for the last 10 weeks in the new financial year. Take away food and the figures poor.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47974424
As for wages rising at circa 3.5% well this is what Danny Blancfllower said a couple of days ago:
“Real wages this month down 5.9% since feb08 versus -5.3% last month real wages fell from 497 to 494 on the month seems rather contrary to journalist’s reports who don’t seem able to read data”
Most posters on your blog appear to take the ONS figures with a pinch of salt, and so do I.
True some people who are skilled and in short supply like bricklayers I think boosting the figures, however I suspect the majority not seeing their wages outstrip inflation.
If there is any good news around the UK performing better than Europe, so on that count it may be better to leave and take a chance on a short term hit to the UK economy. But having said that I don’t believe the clowns we have elected in parliament have a clue what to do.
Hi Peter
I did ask the ONS about the stockpiling issue and here is their reply from earlier.
As for Danny he is simultaneously a cherry picker and the opposite as he only finds bad news. I have lost count of the number of times in the last few years he has promised us that the monthly data has suggested a fall in employment and a rise in unemployment. Whereas we have had one of the biggest employment booms ever!
The monthly wages numbers can be like that for total pay due to the bonus section which is erratic and was especially high in January at £8.30. As ever we await more news but for example as wage growth picked up last year this happened twice on a monthly basis.
Sorry to keep harping on about this, but with the UK continuing its 20 year trend of adding not far off 1% to its population each year, it would be absolutely terrible if the numbers weren’t at least as positive as the ones being reported.
Hi JimW
I think that 6.7% annual growth deals with the 1% population growth but GDP growth is begged when you look at the population rises. Personally I think we should look at GDP per head more as frankly for many areas it is hard to even define productivity let alone measure it.
Excellent podcast Shaun especially this new “share the house appreciation wealth scheme” which would require a technical derivitive / option specialist (like your self) and an expert in real estate fine print to do a spreadsheet analysis involving possible future interest rates and those dreaded “extra fees”. In N.A. they’re called condo fees, the original builders/allies control the condo associations (through hidden ownership of units and apathy of owners) and thus the maintenance companies (charges and fees). Again (N.A) a favourite here is discovering they haven’t been charging enough for the capital reserve fund. There definitely is an opportunity for someone to create a specialist advisory company (unallied to the property pimps). These extra fees (now/future) will dictate the appreciation/depreciation value of the property enormously. Be careful, it’s a minefield and you don’t have American 30 year mortgages.
On the alternative side, I’ve seen a central London 35 year leasehold flat {£1100 council fee/queen’s estate) priced liked
toxic sludge(no takers). Spreadsheet option analysis
1.proffession means London base.
2.rent vs 2 per cent mortgage.
3. assume option value in 35 years is zero.
4. Closing costs/ unknown fees.
5. Short term rentability (pay for your vacation).
6. Yearly savings over rent (now/future)
7. Mental health ownership value.
Good luck. Happy Easter everyone. Be careful
Hi Canuckistinian
I have to confess even I was a little shocked at the financial commitment required to get only 25% of a property not even a mile away from where I am typing this. Unless London is going to be rental only ( apart from the 0.1%) something better change as The Stranglers put it.
How much can the condo fees in the United States be?
Google real estate nytimes to get around paywall. There they have personal stories of someone looking at 3 apartments. Generally a nice 2 bed upper east side manhatten that rented for $1700+/- 15 years ago this is your condo fee ($800k+++).
1. Pre war co-op condo, 5 story walk up $700+ month condo fee (studio $400k).
2. Upper East side nice 2 bed rental 15 years ago $1700 month this is your condo fee (1mil++) rental now $4500++
3. Doorman extra regular tips required, gym extra.
4. Your yearly £ 1100 council fee is the monthly condo fee.
5. I calculate rents have increased 250 percent in 15 years.
6. The big game is splitting large 1 bedroom into 2 studios for almost the same price.
7. Condo fees are lightly or non regulated. This is where weaselosity explores boundaries “where no man has gone before”- cue star trek theme song.
Cheers I took your hint and also Googled the buying fees and spotted this on a condo but not a co-op which I will have to look up/
“Mortgage Recording Tax (Condos Only): And the hits just keep on coming for condo purchasers… The mortgage recording tax requires purchasers to pay 1.8% on mortgage amounts under $500,000 and 1.925% on mortgage amounts above $500,000. Remember this is the loan amount and not the purchase price. Yes, that’s real money out the door and paid upfront which will never be recouped. For example, if you bought the average apartment in Manhattan for $2,000,000 (yes that’s is crazy to be the average!), with 20% down, you would be paying 1.925% on the $1,600,000 loan amount or roughly $30,800 for the mortgage recording tax alone.”
https://www.prevu.com/blog/closing-costs-a-buyers-guide-in-nyc-condo-vs-co-op
I wonder if some algorithm scans for words like “mental health” because now I’m getting pop up ads for a private mental health clinic a mile down the road. Interesting!!!
I looked up a self storage place as I found an enormous one behind the development my friends were looking at. It showed me that even in places you know well there are often things tucked away.
But a day later I went onto LinkedIn and got some self storage ads….
1. A blended 30 year jumbo mortgage will be say 4.3 per cent.
Let’s include the lost opportunity cost of the money. So 86k
per annum.
2. Condo fees 30k per annum.
3. Door man tips, parking spot (wow pass), gym extra
4. Special NYC income tax of a couple per cent.
5. Blended mortgage -5 years of payments – +/- 5 per cent
of principle paid off (by my faulty memory)
6. 10k max non itemized tax deduction (buttt my accountant
says I won’t be audited) Friends say “you’re not completely
incorporated-loser”
7. Bottom end prices still rising- all people can afford
8. Okay we’ll make this completely fair – heads we win, tails
you lose. Ready!!!
Jumbo mortgage calculation on 2 million mortgage
Oops. My faulty memory for blended mortgages is based on 20 year Canadian mortgages. So five years of payments on a 30 year us mortgages-uh?!?- 3.5 per cent of the principle paid off after 5 years of mortgage payments?!?- discussing appropriate amortization periods for different interest rates
(amoung statisticians) for people to get 10/15/20/30 yr- requires 3 trays of beer and 3 fist fights to break out.
Special teaser interest rates are a warning sign and it’s usually incorporated in the price. Reversion to the mean(normal not waaaah!) is another. Check out nissan future prodution assembly announcement. Signs,signs everywhere the signs (Guess Who -Canadian band)
Oops!! Five man electrical band. Getting ol’ and senile (or my friends?!? would say the 60’s were a little to good for you eh buddy)