The ongoing problem that is Deutsche Bank

Yesterday saw what might be called an old friend return to the fore. Back in the day I worked at Deutsche Bank or more specifically for Morgan Grenfell which it purchased. Also we have had reason to follow the story of it on here due to several factors. Firstly it is not only intrinsically linked to the German economy it is of course involved all over the Euro area economy as well as being a global bank. But also because it not only was hurt by the impact of the credit crunch and then of course by the Euro area crisis but a decade or so later from the former it has never really shaken off the view that things went very wrong. You could call it a balance sheet problem or a derivatives based one or a combination of both. Perhaps it is better to put it under the label of trust as in lack of.

Or to put it another way we have seen a form of official denial this morning and we know what to do with them! From Reuters.

“At group level, our financial strength is beyond doubt,” new CEO Christian Sewing said in a letter to staff, candidly admitting that the news flow around the bank was “not good”.

We of course know what to think when somebody tells us something is beyond doubt and if we did not this from the Financial Times helps us out.

My dear colleagues, the last few years were tough. Many of you are sick and tired of bad news. That’s exactly how I feel. But there’s no reason for us to be discouraged. Yes, our share price is at a historic low. But we’ll prove that we have earned a better valuation on the financial markets. We’ve achieved a lot we can be proud of. Now we need to look forward.

It would seem that those backing things with their money are not entirely clear about the “beyond doubt” financial strength as a share price at a historic low tends to indicate exactly the reverse. Also share prices are supposed to look forwards.

Number Crunching

This morning the relief around the actual formation of an Italian government plus no doubt some rallying of the fund management troops has seen the share price rise to 9.5 Euros. But this only corrects around half of yesterday’s 7% fall which saw it bottom at 9.06 Euros and close at 9.18. This compares rather badly with the 15.88 Euros at which it closed 2017 especially as we are supposed to be in a Euro boom. Compared to a year ago the share price is some 42% lower and those of a nervous disposition might do well to look away from the over 94 Euros of early 2007.

The price was lower back in the autumn of 2016 as we mull what “historic low” means? But banks are supposed to do well in the good times and yet Deutsche seems back in the mire. Or to put it another way Welt are pointing out that it was once the same size in terms of market capitalisation as JP Morgan whereas it has now fallen to one- sixteenth of it.

Across the pond

The Wall Street Journal has pointed out this.

The Federal Reserve has designated Deutsche Bank AG’s sprawling U.S. business as being in a “troubled condition,” a rare censure for a major financial institution that has contributed to constraints on its operations, according to people familiar with the matter.

It went on to explain what this meant.

The Fed’s downgrade, which took place about a year ago, is secret and hadn’t previously been made public. The “troubled condition” status—one of the lowest designations employed by the Fed—has influenced th bank’s moves to reduce risk-taking in areas including trading and lending to customers.

It also means the bank has had to clear decisions about hiring and firing senior U.S. managers with Fed overseers. Even reassigning job duties and making severance payments for certain employees require Fed approval, the people said.

In one respect this is a welcome move in that it is a regulator acting although we also need to note that the US Fed seems much more enthusiastic about such moves for foreign banks. After all at home it has just announced plans to ease the Volcker Rule.

The issue for Deutsche Bank is that this development calls into question its plans for the US. Is it even in charge of its operations and did it or the US Fed drive the announced changes?

In many ways this is one of the most damning things you can say about a bank.

The Fed also reupped its criticism of Deutsche Bank’s financial documentation. Examiners expressed frustration at what they described as the bank’s inability to calculate, at the end of any given day, its exposures to what banks and other clients it had in specific jurisdictions, and over what duration, some of the people said.

Standard and Poors

We have learnt over time that the ratings agencies are like the cavalry which arrived the day after the battle of Little Big Horn. But sometimes they do add a little value.

June 1, 2018–S&P Global Ratings today lowered its
long-term issuer credit ratings (ICR) on Deutsche Bank AG and its core
subsidiaries to ‘BBB+’ from ‘A-‘. The outlook is stable.

So stable that they are downgrading it? Anyway we get some detail as to why this has happened.

The lowering of our long-term issuer credit rating reflects that Deutsche
Bank’s updated strategy envisages a deeper restructuring of the business model
than we previously expected, with associated non-negligible execution risks……the bank
appears set for a period of sustained underperformance compared with peers,
many of whom have now finished restructuring.

Or to put it more bluntly you are in pretty poor shape if you are behind the sorry crew listed below.

By contrast, key peers such as
Barclays, Commerzbank, Credit Suisse, and the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS)
have now worked through their restructuring and business model optimization
and are already starting to see improved performance.

Comment

The fundamental problem here in my opinion is the view held by many within it that Germany will always have at least two banks of which Deutsche Bank will be one. Even in the protected world of banking that is an extreme position. Combined with the credit crunch and then the Euro area crisis this means that it is time for the Cranberries.

Zombie, zombie, zombie, ei, ei
What’s in your head?
In your head
Zombie, zombie, zombie

It seems to have little clear purpose other than its own survival as it struggles from one crisis to the next. So far it emerges from each of them weaker than before but the official view mimics the “Tis but a scratch” of the Black Knight.

I note some reporting that the ECB says the turnaround is going well whereas I also note that things seem not so hot in a land down under.

Australia is preparing criminal cartel charges against the country’s third-biggest bank and underwriters Deutsche Bank and Citigroup over a $2.3 billion share issue, in an unprecedented move with potential implications for global capital markets. ( Reuters)

It’s a mistake……

These days even higher house prices do not seem to be enough. From its own research in January.

During the current real-estate cycle, i.e., from 2009 to 2017, house prices have risen 80% in large metropolitan areas (A cities) and c. 60% in B and C cities….The tight market situation has pushed house prices up even more strongly in
2017 than in the preceding years. According to bulwiengesa (which covers 126 cities), house prices rose c. 6 ½% and apartment prices more than 10% on average.

Advertisements

The Italian bond and bank crisis of May 2018

Oh what a difference a couple of days can make, especially in Italy right now. However we can see the cause of this quite easily and have done so more than a few times in the past. Back at the end of the last century when the Euro currency concept was being prepared its supporters argued that it would bring economic convergence to its member countries. The reality for Italy has been this if we look for an individual measure of economic performance.

The convergence issue has been a disaster for Italy. Ironically it seemed to be holding station with Germany before the Euro began but since it the German locomotive has powered ahead leaving the Italian carriage in a siding. If you had set out to diverge the two economies it would have been hard to do better ( worse?) than this. Also my theme that Italy struggles in the relatively good times was at play in the early part of the century. Then it was hit hard by the credit crunch and the Euro area crisis and sadly has still not fully sorted its banking problems.

Poverty

Another way of observing the Italian economic experience has been provided in a paper from the Universities of Modena and Rome which point out another reversal.

The paper explores the changing risk of poverty for older and younger generations of Italians throughout the republican period, 1948 to the present day. We show that
poverty rates have decreased steadily for all age groups, but that youth has been left behind. The risk of poverty for children aged 0-17, relative to adults over 65, has
increased steadily over time: in 1977, children faced a risk of poverty 30 percent lower than the elderly, but by 2016 they are 5 times likelier to be poor than someone in the age
range of their grandparents.

It is easy to always look at the bad side so let us take a moment of cheer as we note that in general poverty has fallen since the second world war and mankind has stepped forwards. However the rub as Shakespeare would put it is that the times may be a-changing and the poverty we see now in Italy is concentrated in younger age groups. This reminds me of another statistic.

Youth unemployment rate (aged 15-24) was 31.7%, -0.9 percentage points over the previous month.

So as the overall unemployment rate is 11% then the youth unemployment rate must be treble that of older age groups. Which means that they have gone back to the future.

As a matter of fact, young Italians today face approximately the same risk of poverty as their equals in age in the 1970s. No economic miracle has happened for them, and none is expected.

This seems to have been a deliberate policy as we note this.

 Our analysis points to the welfare state, which offers better protection for the elderly than it does for
the young and their families………More importantly, the
elderly continued their march towards a poverty-free existence, while the youth did not.

This leads to a rather chilling statement.

Overall, in the last seven decades, Italy has become no country for young people.

Some of this is an international issue as for example the UK had the triple-lock for the basic state pension but some is specifically Italy.

National Debt

This is an issue but not in the ordinary way. This is because what can be described as the third biggest national debt in the world has not be caused by fiscal recklessness. In recent times Italy has been restrained. The problem has been the one described above which is the lack of economic growth. On such a road to nowhere even small fiscal deficits see the national debt rise in relation to economic output or GDP (Gross Domestic Product).

Perhaps the new Prime Minister will live up to his “Mr. Scissors” nickname in this area but it will be hard for a man facing a confidence vote to do much I would think.

Italian bonds

As you can imagine this has felt just like old times for me and in spite of yesterday being a glorious bank holiday at least until the evening thunderstorm I was transfixed for a while by what was happening. Two old rules of mine worked as well.

I like the idea of applying something I was taught at the LSE albeit with a personal spin as so much has found its way into the recycling bin. Nobody seems to pick it up either which means it is set fair for the future. The other is that you buy an intraday fall of more than two points. That worked as well but with the caveat that it was a case of the “quick and the dead” and you would have been stopped out today.

Moving to the state of play as I type this we see what has become a bloodbath. The Italian BTP bond future has fallen 5 points to a low of 124 and this compares to a bit over 139 as recently as the 7th of this month. Putting it another way the ten-year yield has risen from 1.76% to 3.1%. This may not seem large moves so let me explain the issue in the QE ( Quantitative Easing) era.

  1. They are bigger than you think and an example of this is the way the US Treasury Bond market used to have a trading halt after two point moves. Annoying at the time but does give a breather.
  2. In the QE era there is the view that the central bank will bail things out and that to quote Flo “the dogs days are over”
  3. This may have tempted investors to increase position size to make a profit which of course would now be in trouble.
  4. As implied volatilities fall it is tempting not only to put on derivative positions but to increase their size as human nature is particularly vulnerable at such times.

We have two clear examples of such events. One I traded through which was the LTCM crisis of the late 90s which was a case of intellectual arrogance and of course we had the travails of the VIX index earlier this year.

Whatever It Takes

The famous saying from ECB President Draghi from the summer of 2012 of course had to save the Euro as an implication but some translated it as “to save the Italian banks”. We have followed over time the multitude of issues here but as we looked at last week another problem emerged on Thursday. From @YanniKouts.

The minute the markets will realize that Italy will restructure its debt, the Italian banks and eventually the economy will collapse. Corralito.

Since then the share prices of the Italian banks have moved into yet another bear market. Our old friend Monte Paschi the world’s oldest bank is at 2.32 Euros down 5% today or 1 Euro lower than a fortnight ago. Those of a nervous disposition might like to look away now as I point out that compares to a pre credit crunch peak of more like 7700 Euros. In a way the Italian financial crisis can be summed up by Prime Minister Renzi saying it was a good investment. Oh and as Polemic Paine reminds us a past theme is in play right now.

Waiting for second round effects from all the private hands that clamoured to buy the Italian banks’ dodgy debt.

These days the role of the ECB has increased as of course it is also the banking supervisor which I think is a bit like being Liverpool’s goalkeeping coach.

Comment

There is much to consider here and let me throw in something from this morning’s data which will not help. From the ECB.

The annual growth rate of the narrower aggregate M1, which includes currency in circulation
and overnight deposits, decreased to 7.0% in April, from 7.5% in March.

Another hint of an economic slow down albeit broad money was a little better. Moving to the financial crisis this will be felt by individual Italians as they are savers and for example around 64% of Italian debt is held by domestic hands. So they are losing and whilst overseas investors are in a minority that is still some 685 billion Euros due to the size of the market. Thanks to the Bruegel group for the data. This is of course before we get to the stock market and those holding bank debt. Remember when we were told what great deals the bank debt was? Also the “protecting savers” part from President Mattarella not only goes into my financial lexicon for these times but will be part of what historians will call the Mattarella Error.

As a final though this has answered a question we have been asking for a while. What would get the Euro to fall? This has been answered as we note it has dropped to 1.15 and a bit versus the US Dollar and even the UK Pound £ has nudged a little higher to the nearly the same number.

 

 

 

When will Deutsche Bank, Barclays and TSB get off the zombie bank path?

It is time to take a look at an old friend except it is more along the lines of hello darkness my old friend from Paul Simon. This is because my old employer Deutsche Bank has had a very troubled credit crunch era. In spite of better economic times in Germany and indeed much of the Euro area it never seems to quite shake off its past problems or the rumours of something of a supermassive black hole in its derivatives book. This has not been helped by this morning’s figures. From CNBC.

Deutsche Bank posted first-quarter net profits of 120 million euros($146 million) Thursday, a 79 percent fall from last year’s figure.

The first impression is that this is not much for Germany’s biggest bank especially as 2017 and the early part of 2018 was supposed to be the Euroboom. Also there is this to be taken into account.

he net profit number was significantly lower than a Reuters poll prediction of 376 million euros. The Frankfurt-based lender has been under scrutiny from shareholders for posting three consecutive years of losses, including a 497 million euro loss for 2017.

Thus we see that Deutsche Bank has been a serial offender on this front and if we look back no doubt it was knocked back by the Euro area crisis but times improved and of course there have been so many bank friendly policies pursued by the European Central Bank. For example most bond holdings either sovereign or corporate will have been boosted by all the QE bond buying that has and indeed still is taking place. Then there have been all the liquidity support programmes ( LTROs) which may have fallen off the media radar but there are still 741 billion Euros of them expiring in 2020 and 21. Of course this leads to a situation I pointed out yesterday which is a very bank (asset) friendly consequence.

House prices, as measured by the House Price Index, rose by 4.2% in the euro area and by 4.5% in the EU in the
fourth quarter of 2017 compared with the same quarter of the previous year……….Compared with the third quarter of 2017, house prices rose by 0.9% in the euro area and by 0.7% in the EU in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Germany saw a 3.7% year on year rise.

Also according to ECB research bank profitability is not impacted by negative interest-rates.

It finds that both profitability and cost efficiency have continued to improve on the back of rising bank
operating incomes in Sweden and falling operating expenses in Denmark, even when faced with negative monetary policy rates and the banks’ reluctance to
introduce negative deposit rates.

In fact it even confessed to the QE subsidy albeit by referring to somewhere else.

In particular, “realised and unrealised gains” on
securities have helped improve the profitability of Swedish banks. Other contributory
factors probably include the economic recovery and the government bond purchase
programmes pursued by the Riksbank.

What next?

The traditional remedy is to lay-off a few people, often much more than a few people,

Deutsche Bank (XETRA: DBKGn.DE / NYSE: DB) has announced strategic adjustments to shift the bank to more stable revenue sources and strengthen its core business lines.

Or to put it another way.

The bank will scale back activities in US Rates sales and trading……..Commitment to sectors in the US and Asia, in which cross-border activity is limited, will be reduced. ….. The bank will be undertaking a review of its Global Equities business with the expectation of reducing its platform.

This is something of a merry-go-round these days where a new boss comes in and announces changes and of course get at least a couple of years for him/herself, more if we add in the usually large pay-off. Those who think that DB requires a complete change of atmosphere direction and philosophy will not be reassured by this bit though.

A Deutsche Bank veteran who started as an apprentice, Sewing

Barclays Bank

In a way the problems at Barclays have been provided with something of a smokescreen by all the troubles at Royal Bank of Scotland. Let’s face it almost anything looks good when compared to it. But there has certainly been a lost decade for shareholders as the just under £7 has been replaced by £2.16 as I type this. Of course many banks saw dives but it the lack of any recovery that is the real problem to my mind. There was the bounce back above £3 in the early days but that now is mired in problems and indeed the courts as the involvement of middle-eastern shareholders gets investigated.

Bringing this up to date as in this morning we see this. From the BBC.

Barclays reported a pre-tax loss of £236m, compared with a profit of £1.68bn for the same time last year.

Okay and why?

“This quarter we… reached an agreement with the US Department of Justice to resolve issues related to the sale of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities between 2005 and 2007,” said chief executive Jes Staley.

“While the penalty was substantial, this settlement represents a major milestone for Barclays, putting behind us a significant decade-old legacy matter.”

That was for £1.4 billion and I guess it was seen as a good time to throw some more fuel on an ongoing sore.

The bank also put aside an additional £400m to cover an increase in payment protection insurance (PPI) mis-selling claims.

I have lost count of the number of times we have been told that in modern vernacular the PPI scandal is like, so over. The number below relies on you thinking that losses are a legacy issue and profits are for life.

But excluding litigation costs, pre-tax profit rose by 1% to £1.7bn.

Seeing as the facts are pretty much known this seems a case of one rule for you and one rule for me.

Last week, it was revealed that Mr Staley is facing a fine by UK regulators for breaching rules when he tried to identify a whistleblower at the bank.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) began their probe into Mr Staley’s conduct a year ago.

Lower ranked employees would be sacked for that.

TSB

For those unaware the TSB was the Trustee Savings Bank which has been revived as a way of spinning out some customers from Lloyds Banking Group. The latter ended up being too large via the way the UK government back then persuaded it to take on Halifax Bank of Scotland which effectively torpedoed Lloyds. Anyway there has been a litany of IT issues which began last weekend leading to #tsbdown and #tsbfail proliferating. I can though find one happy customer.

The official view from CEO Paul Pester is this.

Our mobile banking app and online banking are now up and running. Thank you for your patience and for bearing with us.

Yet lot’s of people are still claiming that they do not work. We get told so often that bankers need to be highly paid to get the best people and yet realities like this suggest that the individuals involved are far from the best.

Comment

As we look back we see a banking world that in some areas has recovered but in others has not. The issue of IT ( Information Technology) has been an ongoing sore as I recall replies on here suggesting 1970s style systems still exist because they are afraid what might happen if there are changes. But there is also the issue of share prices where RBS which no doubt is relieved that for once it is not in the news today is nowhere near what the UK taxpayer paid. Barclays I have mentioned. Then there is Deutsche Bank where 12 Euros has replaced the 17 of mid-December and the mid 90s pre credit crunch. Who would have predicted that a decade ago?

Time for the sadly recently departed Delores from the Cranberries to echo out again.

Zombie, zombie, zombie-ie-ie
What’s in your head, in your head?
Zombie, zombie, zombie-ie-ie, oh

Me on Core Finance

What is it about RBS and the banks?

A major feature of the credit crunch was the collapse of more than a few banks as a combination of miss pricing, bullish expansionism and arrogance all collided. This led to the economic world-changing as for example the way we now have extremely low ( ZIRP) and in more than a few places negative interest-rates and of course all the QE bond purchases which are ongoing in both the Euro area and Japan. So lower short and long-term interest-rates and that is before we get to the cost of the bailouts themselves. The US and UK acted early but others took longer as my updates on Italy for example explain and describe. It’s Finance Minister ( Padoan ) even had the cheek to boast about not helping its banks which then created ever larger bad loans.

The essential problem is that this is still ongoing as the news from Royal Bank of Scotland overnight tells us.

Royal Bank of Scotland on Tuesday agreed a $500m settlement with New York State over mis-selling residential mortgage-backed securities in the run-up to the financial crisis………..The agreement requires the bank to pay $100m in cash and to provide $400m of consumer relief in New York. It is the latest in a series of settlements with US authorities that has resulted in banks handing over $150bn in payments and fines since the crisis.

This is yet another in a series that feels like rinse and repeat but we are now a decade on from things heading south for RBS as on the 22nd of 2008 what was the largest rights issue ever in the UK took place. The £12 billion cash from that did not even last 6 months as on the 13th of October the UK government stepped in. In other words the documents from that rights issue look to have been about a misleading as they could be along the lines of Sir Desmond Glazebrook in Yes Prime Minister who when asked about the rules replied “They didn’t seem quite appropriate”.

So we have ended up with something that looks like a bottomless pit although as ever it is put PR style.

Ross McEwan, chief executive, said: “We have been very clear that putting our remaining legacy issues behind us is a key part of our strategy.”

Legacy issues indeed and of course a much larger one is on its way.

RBS, part-owned by the UK government, has set aside $4.4bn to deal with residential mortgage-backed security claims in the US and recently revealed its first annual profit in nine years.

This poses its own question as we mull the latest development which is for only one state.

Ian Gordon, an analyst at Investec, said the deal with New York was “a disturbingly large single-state settlement ahead of the main event”.

Any new settlement would add to this.

 

RBS has been trying to close the door on misconduct issues from the crisis and in 2017 agreed to pay £4.2bn to the US Federal Housing Finance Agency in relation to mortgage-backed securities.

What about the law?

This seems to have been missing from the banking sector and especially in the case of the 2008 rights issue of RBS. However this morning has brought news that you can be jailed for financial crimes. From the BBC.

A group of fraudsters who conned UK consumers out of £37m by selling passports and driving licences through copycat websites have been sentenced to more than 35 years in jail.

The six people, led by Peter Hall and including his wife Claire, operated websites that impersonated official government services.

Perhaps the establishment was upset by the way they were impersonated but we are left with the thought that as the crime was compared to the banks small-scale it could be punished. Along the way something seemed rather familiar though.

 “This was a crime motivated by greed. This group defrauded people so they could enjoy a luxury lifestyle.”

If we actually move to banking crime a somewhat different set of rules seem to apply. Yesterday the Financial Conduct Authority finally banned the man called the Crystal Methodist due to his drug taking proclivities but of course Chair of the Co-op Bank which nearly collapsed.

Mr Flowers was Chair of Co-op Bank between 15 April 2010 and 5 June 2013. The FCA found that Mr Flowers’ conduct demonstrated a lack of fitness and propriety required to work in financial services.

So our first thought is to sing along with the Doobie Brothers.

Gotta keep on pushin’ Mama
‘Cause you know they’re runnin’ late

After all most of us knew there was “trouble,trouble,trouble” as Taylor Swift would out it in June 2013. However when you see what he was banned for it is hard not to let off some steam.

The FCA found that while Chair Mr Flowers:

 

used his work mobile telephone to make a number of inappropriate telephone calls to a premium rate chat line in breach of Co-op Group and Co-op Bank policies;

and used his work email account to send and receive sexually explicit and otherwise inappropriate messages, and to discuss illegal drugs, in breach of Co-op Group and Co-op Bank policies despite having been previously warned about his earlier misconduct.

In addition, after stepping down as Chair, Mr Flowers was convicted for possession of illegal drugs.

As you can see destroying a bank and causing losses in some cases substantial to a large number of people does not appear on the charge sheet whilst calling a premium rate chat line does.

Helping the economy

We were told the economy would not be able to survive without the banks yet as time has gone on they are still deleveraging. From Which.

In December last year, RBS/Natwest announced that it was closing a staggering 259 bank branches in 2018 – a quarter of its branch network. That included 62 RBS and 197 NatWest branches, plus 11 Ulster Bank branches which were previously announced.

The UK taxpayer will also be grimly observing this as the share price falls another 5 pence at the time of typing this to £2.59 as opposed to the £5.02 paid for its holding.

Comment

There are various problems with the state of play. The first is the way that the law pretty much only applies one way regarding the banks. If we misbehave we can expect to be punished sometimes severely. I have no axe to grind with that until we note that it at best intermittently applies to the banks themselves and even less to those at the top of the food chain. For example whilst Santander is perfectly at liberty to pay bonuses which Nathan Bostock would have received at RBS this raises hackles to say the least when it was from the GRG section which wrecked havoc amongst so many small businesses. It seems that bank directors are even more an example of the “precious” than the banks themselves. If we do not make changes how can we expect matters to improve?

When a bank is bailed out we are never told the full truth as this emerges later and sometimes much later as the news today is around a decade after the event. When the truth requires drip feeding well that speaks for itself. Also I note that in the intervening decade this issue goes on and on. From the Financial Stability Board.

The activity-based, narrow measure of shadow banking grew by 7.6% in 2016, to $45.2 trillion for the 29 jurisdictions……..Monitoring Universe of Non-bank Financial Intermediation (MUNFI) – This measure of
all non-bank financial intermediation grew in 2016 at a slightly faster rate than in 2015 to an aggregate $160 trillion.

We need to take care as one day that will rise to a lot of money! Also wasn’t this supposed to have been a problem pre credit crunch?

 

 

What is going on with the banks of Italy?

Yesterday saw something of a familiar theme as we were told this by Fabrizio Pagani, the chief of staff at Italy’s Ministry of Economy and Finance.

*PAGANI: ITALIAN BANKS ARE DEFINITELY FIXED ( h/t @mhewson_CMC )

You would be forgiven for thinking not only what again? But also experiencing some fatigue after being told it so often. Less than twelve hours later something else that is rather familiar turned up.

PAGANI SAYS ITALIAN BANKING NEEDS CONSOLIDATION ( h/t @lemasabachthani )

So they weren’t fixed for long it would seem! According to Bloomberg who had the interview we had another hostage to fortune as well from him.

“The story of Italian non-performing loans is over,” Pagani said.

He sounds so much like Finance Minster Padoan doesn’t he? In reality even those who are friendly to such ideas have doubts.

As you can see even Spain which was criticised for acting slowly in fact was 3/4 years ahead of Italy we note that the Italian problem got worse during this period. In fact Spain is in the process of repaying the ESM ( European Stability Mechanism) the money it borrowed for this.

Spain made the request for the repayment on 30 January 2018. One repayment will be for €2 billion, and is planned for 23 February 2018. The size of the second repayment will be €3 billion, and is scheduled for May 2018.

So in total this has happened.

Between December 2012 and February 2013, the ESM disbursed €41.3 billion to the Spanish government for the recapitalisation of the country’s banking sector……….Following the two repayments, Spain’s outstanding debt to the ESM will stand at €26.7 billion.

So Spain is exiting the procedure as Italy begins it and as is so usual Italy is doing it in its own way. For example in the tweet picture above the phrase bail in is used when in fact what it has done have had the features of bailouts as well. Also is this good or simply kicking the can somewhere else?

Investors also snapped up more than 100 billion euros ($123 billion) in non-performing Italian bank loans last year, which has helped reduce the level of net bad debt across the sector by more than a third.

Some may think that this may be more like vultures on their prey.

This month, Bob Diamond and Corrado Passera, the former bosses of Barclays Plc and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, joined forces to shop for a lender to smaller Italian companies.

Monte Paschi

It too was in the news yesterday as Bloomberg told us this.

Fabrizio Pagani, the chief of staff at Italy’s Ministry of Economy and Finance, told Bloomberg News that Monte Paschi is in the picture for mergers after taking substantial steps to clean up its balance sheet since its rescue and introduce new management practices.

Who wants to merge with a zombie? I am reminded of what my late father used to tell me which is that more than a few takeovers and mergers only exist because the muddle the figures for a year or to. I can see why the Italian state might be keen as they did this.

A sale of Monte Paschi would cap a saga that saw Italy’s third-biggest bank, an icon of national finance, become engulfed by bad debts, criminal cases, and 6.7 billion euros in losses in the last two years. The government salvaged it as part of a 8.3 billion-euro recapitalization that strained ties between the country and the European Union over bailout rules.

Italy paid some 6.49 Euros a share as opposed to the 3.18 as I type this as we mull how the “substantial steps” have been ignored by the market which has more than halved the share price? We also learnt something from its bond issue in January. From the Financial Times.

Despite the low rating, the bond sale was three times subscribed and priced at a yield of just 5.375 per cent, confirming Monte Paschi’s ability to tap markets after its 2017 recapitalisation,

“Just 5.375%”? As in Europe these days that feels like riches beyond imagination! Especially if you note this.

The Italian government will provide a guarantee to the investment grade rated senior notes in this securitisation, which Monte Paschi will “retain” on its books.

I also thought that the bailout fund Atlante was pretty much out of cash.

It is able to derecognise the non-performing loans, however, because the riskier “mezzanine” and junior notes are being sold to the Italian Recovery Fund………..
While this fund — formerly known as Atlante — is private, it is part of a government-led initiative to clean up the Italian banking sector, and has far lower return targets than typical distressed debt buyers.

Anyway the share price reflects something rather different from the rhetoric as I note that according to Il Populista our old friend Finance Minister Padoan is on the case again.

The state will remain in Mps “for a few years”. Economy Minister Pier Carlo Padoan told the unions to add that “giving a number would be wrong and counterproductive for the markets”.

Giving wrong numbers has never bothered him before as I note this description of him which may be a quirk of Google translate.

The Minister of Economy, without shame,

The ECB

Today has brought news that swings both ways for the Italian banks as we have got the data which determines the interest-rate for TLTRO II so it was not a surprise to see this.

The annual growth rate of adjusted loans to non-financial corporations increased to 3.4% in January, from 3.1% in December.

Of the new 24 billion Euros some 20 billion was for less than a year but presumably long enough to fulfil the ECB criteria with the Italian banks to the fore.

January net lending flows to the non-financial private sector were particularly strong in Germany and Italy (second largest in over 10 years). ( @fwred )

Yet so far they have gained little as the annual gain from this according to @fwred is 769 million Euros for the Spanish banks but 0 for the Italian ( Portuguese and Dutch) ones. Perhaps the last-minute dash will make a difference.

Veneto Banks

The collapse of Veneto Banca and Banca Popolare di Vicenza. last year led to many financial problems in the area. In banking terms this happened.

The two Veneto banks were wound down in June, with the state guaranteeing losses of up to €17bn, after the European Central Bank declared the lenders as failing. Intesa was handed as much as €4.8bn to help preserve its capital ratios from any adverse impact from the deal. ( FT)

Yet as this from IlFattoQuotidiano.it  in January shows the pain for many businesses and savers continues.

He finally gave up. But it took six hours of negotiation because the former Romanian bricklayer Marin Halarambie, 59, agreed to move his car from the entrance of the historic Veneto Banca headquarters in Montebelluna. Christmas Day had arrived to stage a very personal protest, as the bankruptcy of the bank cost him a loss of about 125 thousand euros.

Comment

This is a particularly Italian saga where official boasting about the lack of bank bailouts met a brick wall of bank collapses later. Even worse the problem deteriorated as they looked the other way. On this road equity investors suffered – who can forget Prime Minister Renzi telling people Monte Paschi was a good investment ? – and so did the savers who were encouraged to invest in the “safe” bank bonds.

Now the economic outlook is better we wait to see what happens next. But there is a clear distinction between my subject of yesterday the Netherlands and Italy and it is this. From January 11th.

According to preliminary estimates, in the third quarter of 2017: the House Price Index (see Italian IPAB) decreased by 0.5% compared with the previous quarter and by
0.8% in comparison to the same quarter of the previous year (it was -0.2% in the second quarter of 2017);

For all the machinations that have gone on Italy has so far been immune from the suggested cure seen so often elsewhere which is to make the banks mortgage assets look stronger via higher house prices. How very Italian! Still the winners here are Italian first time buyers if they can get a mortgage.

Last week Bank of Italy Deputy Governor Panetta gave a speech which in one way suggested he must know some incredibly pessimistic people.

During the financial crisis, Italy’s banking system proved much more resilient than expected by many observers.

But intriguingly he does agree with me that if the buyers of bad loans are getting a good deal this must weaken and not strengthen the banks?

A generalized sale of NPLs on the market would imply a large transfer of resources from banks to buyers.

No wonder Diamond Bob is on the case! Also this is yet again rather familiar.

While the secondary market for NPLs is showing signs of rapid growth, it is still opaque and relatively oligopolistic.

And?

Simultaneous, blanket sales would further depress
market prices, magnifying the gap between the book and market values of NPLs. The result
for banks would be significant losses and reduced capital. This could have unintended effects
on individual banks as well as macroeconomic consequences through a contraction in credit
supply in countries where high NPL stocks are a concern for several banks.

 

 

 

 

The Netherlands house price boom is yet another form of bank bailout

It has been a while since we have taken a look at the economic situation in what some call Holland but is more accurately called the Netherlands. On a cold snowy morning in London – those of you in colder climes are probably laughing at the media panic over the cold snap expected this week – let us open with some good news. From Statistics Netherlands.

According to the first estimate conducted by Statistics Netherlands (CBS), which is based on currently available data, gross domestic product (GDP) posted a growth rate of 0.8 percent in Q4 2017 relative to Q3 2017. Growth is mainly due to an increase in exports. With the release of data on Q4, the annual growth rate over 2017 has become available as well. Last year, GDP rose by 3.1 percent, the highest growth in ten years.

Indeed the economic growth was something of a dream ticket for economists with exports and investments to the fore.

GDP was 2.9 percent up on Q4 2016. Growth was slightly smaller than in the previous three-quarters and is mainly due to higher exports and investments.

The trade development provides food for thought to those who remember this from 2015.

In a bid to boost trade links with Europe, on the back of the ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative, the Port of Rotterdam has established a strategic partnership with the Bank of China,  (jpvlogistics )

The idea of Rotterdam being a hub for a latter-day Silk Road is obviously good for trade prospects although in terms of GDP care is needed as there is a real danger of double-counting as we have seen in the past.

Exports of goods and services grew by 5.5 percent in 2017……….Re-exports (i.e. exports of imported products) increased slightly more rapidly than the exports of Dutch products.

If we look back for some perspective we see that the Netherlands is not one of those places that have failed to recover from the credit crunch. Compared to 2009 GDP is at 112.7 which means that if we allow for the near 4% fall in that year it is 8/9% larger than the previous peak. Although of course annual economic growth of around 1% per annum is not a triumph and reflects the Euro area crisis that followed the credit crunch.

Labour Market

The economic growth is confirmed by this and provides a positive hint for the spring.

In January 2018, almost 8.7 million people in the Netherlands were in paid employment. The employed labour force (15 to 74-year-olds) has increased by 15 thousand on average in each of the past three months.

Unemployment is falling and in this area we can call the Netherlands a Germanic style economy.

There were 380 thousand unemployed in January, equivalent to 4.2 percent of the labour force. This stood at 4.4 percent one month previously………, youth unemployment is now at a lower level than before the economic crisis; last month, it stood at 7.4 percent of the labour force against 8.5 percent in November 2008.

After the good news comes something which is both familiar and troubling.

Wages increased by 1.5 percent in 2017 versus 1.8 percent in 2016. There was less difference between the increase rates of consumer prices and wages in 2017 than in the two preceding years.

Wage growth fell last year which of course is more mud in the eye for those who persist with “output gap” style economics meaning real wages only grew by 0.1%. 2016 was much better but driven by lower inflation mostly. So no real wage growth on any scale and certainly not back to the levels of the past. One thing that stands out is real wage falls from 2010 to 14 in the era of Euro area austerity.

House Prices

There were hints of activity in this area in the GDP numbers as we note where investment was booming.

In 2017, investments were up by 6 percent. Higher investments were mainly made in residential property.

Later I noted this.

and further recovery of the housing market.

So what is the state of play?

In January 2018, prices of owner-occupied houses (excluding new constructions) were on average 8.8 percent higher than in the same month last year. The price increase was the highest in 16 years. Since June 2013, the trend has been upward.

So much higher than wage growth which was 1.5% in 2017 and inflation so let us look deeper for some perspective.

House prices are currently still 2.0 percent below the record level of August 2008 and on average 24.8 percent higher than during the price dip in June 2013.

One way of looking at this is to add something to the famous Mario Draghi line of the summer of 2012 “Whatever it takes” ( to get Dutch house prices rising again). What it means though is that house prices have soared compared to real wages who only really moved higher in 2016 due ironically to lower consumer inflation. Tell that to a first time buyer!

Wealth Effects

This view has been neatly illustrated by Bloomberg today as whilst the numbers are for Denmark we see from the data above that they apply in principle to the Netherlands as well.

Danes have another reason to be happy: they’re richer than ever before………After more than half a decade of negative interest rates, rising property values in Denmark have left the average family with net assets of 1.9 million kroner ($314,000), according to the latest report on household wealth.

Er……

The last time Denmark enjoyed a similar boom was in 2006

If we switch back to the Netherlands its central bank published some research in January as to how it thinks house price growth has boosted domestic consumption.

From 2014 onwards, house prices have been steadily climbing again. The coefficient found for the Netherlands implies that some 40% of cumulative consumption growth since 2014 (i.e. around 6%) can be attributed to the increase in real house prices.

We can take the DNB research across national boundaries as well at least to some extent.

The first group comprises the Netherlands, Sweden, Ireland, Spain, the United States and the United Kingdom, and the second group includes Italy, France, Belgium, Austria and Portugal.

In economic theory such a boost comes from a permanent boost to house prices which is not quite what we saw pre credit crunch.

Between 2000 and 2008, average real house prices went up by 24% in the Netherlands. Between 2008 and 2014, as a result of the financial crisis, they went down again by 24%.

Debt

This is an issue in the Netherlands.

 As gross domestic product (GDP) rose more sharply than debts, the debt ratio (i.e. debt as a percentage of GDP) declined, to 218.8 percent. Although this is the lowest level since 2008, it is still far above the threshold of 133 percent which has been set by the European Commission.

If we look at household debt.

After a period of decline, household debts started rising as of September 2014, in particular the level of residential mortgage debt. The latter increased from 649 billioneuros at the end of September 2014 to 669 billion euros at the end of June 2017.

There is also this bit highlighted by the DNB last October.

Almost 55% of the aggregate Dutch mortgage debt consists of interest-only and investment-based mortgage loans, which do not involve any contractual repayments during the loan term. They must still be repaid when they expire, however. Such loans could cause frictions, for example if households are forced to sell their home at the end of the loan term.

Comment

There are a litany of issues here as we see another example of procyclical monetary policy where and ECB deposit rate of -0.4% and monthly QE meet economic growth of around 3%. This means that in spite of the fact that real wages have done little house prices have soared again. The problem with the wealth effects argument highlighted above is that much if not all of it is a wealth distribution and who gave the ECB authority to do this?

Those who own homes in a good location have it made. While other people – especially people who rent their homes and people with bought homes in less favorable locations – fall behind. ( NL Times)

Those who try to be first time buyers are hit hard but a type of inflation that does not appear in the CPI numbers.

The truth is that the biggest gainers collectively are the banks. Their asset base improves with higher house prices and current business improves as we see more mortgage borrowing both individually and from the business sector. We moved from explicit bank bailouts to stealth ones as we see so many similar moves around the world. Banks do not report that in bonus statements do they? This time is different until it isn’t when it immediately metamorphoses into nobody’s fault.

 

 

 

 

 

What is happening to the banking sector in Latvia?

This morning has brought yet more news on what appears to be a growing issue which is the banking sector of Latvia. It has been around a decade since Latvia made the economic news as a type of test case for a joint IMF ( International Monetary Fund) and European Union bailout which was caused by this.

Despite the bailout, Latvia suffered the largest decline in economic output of anywhere in the world between 2007 and 2009 – a 24% drop in GDP. Unemployment quadrupled; and that doesn’t include the estimated one in 10 of the workforce who left the country to look for a better life somewhere else. ( The Guardian).

Since then (2014) Latvia abandoned its own currency the Lat and adopted the Euro although it had pegged its currency to the Euro.

This morning has seen the ECB ( European Central Bank) take action.

The Financial and Capital Markets Commission (FCMC) has imposed a moratorium on ABLV Bank, following a request by the European Central Bank (ECB). This means that temporarily, and until further notice, a prohibition of all payments by ABLV Bank on its financial liabilities has been imposed, and is now in effect.

It is that word “temporarily” again as we note that until further notice was sufficient on its own. So how did we get here?

In recent days, there has been a sharp deterioration of the bank’s financial position. This follows an announcement on 13 February by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to propose a measure naming ABLV bank an institution of primary money laundering concern pursuant to Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act.

ABLV has been accused by the US of being linked to North Korea.  As to the scale of the issue there is this.

ABLV Bank has been supervised by the ECB since November 2014, by virtue of the bank being one of the three largest credit institutions in Latvia, as measured by total assets

The ECB may be forgiven for perhaps wishing it was not the supervisor here. Those who hold the ABLV bank bonds totalling US $95 million that mature on Thursday may be forgiven some nervousness too.

 

Meanwhile as you might expect ABLV itself has found credit hard to come by meaning that the central bank is providing assistance. From the Baltic Times.

“Based on the request from ABLV Bank and a supporting opinion from the Finance and Capital Market Commission, the Bank of Latvia has decided to grant a EUR 97.5 million loan to ABLV Bank against a reliable pledge of highly liquid securities,” the Bank of Latvia said, stressing that the value of the pledge was much higher that the loan amount.

The last bit may be regretted if you think about it and more seems to be on the way.

As reported, ABLV Bank has decided to pledge some securities, asking in return a loan of up to EUR 480 million from the Bank of Latvia, order to stabilize its situation.

Bank of Latvia

This has its own problems as this headline from it yesterday implies.

Latvijas Banka continues its business as usual.

Why announce this and especially on a Sunday? Well it has its own problems.

 during the absence of the Governor, his duties are performed by the Deputy Governor.

Why is he absent? Bloomberg explains.

Latvian authorities prepared to explain the detention of ECB Governing Council member Ilmars Rimsevics by the anti-graft bureau in a weekend of activity culminating in the early-Monday imposition of a payment moratorium on the nation’s third-largest bank.

Officials including Prime Minister Maris Kucinskis and Finance Minister Dana Reizniece-Ozola called on Rimsevics, 52, to recuse himself from his duties as the Baltic state’s anti-corruption office pursued an investigation against him.

This is awkward to say the least as he is unable to lead the rescue effort for ABLV because not only is he under investigation he has been detained, The whole issue of money laundering and corruption is a live one in Latvia partly due to its close connections with Russia. A bit like the Cypriot banking sector we see that one needs to take great care when accepting Russian private money and to this we can add apparent involvement with North Korea which is unlikely to improve anything.

What about the economy?

The latest Bank of Latvia Monthly Development report brought good news.

GDP growth has been very strong in 2017, exceeding forecasts. In the second quarter, GDP grew by 1.4% quarter-on-quarter (according to seasonally adjusted data) but in the third quarter of 2017 – by 1.5%. Thus, annual GDP growth reached 5.8% in the third quarter of 2017 (according to seasonally adjusted data – 6.2%).

Thus there was quite a surge helped by various factors such as the better economic performance of the Euro area and in particular the other Baltic states. Also there was this giving a helping hand.

As Russia’s economic growth was stabilising, Latvia’s exports of goods to Russia grew by 36.6% year-on-year in the first ten months of 2017. The expansion of exports was largely supported by an increase in exports of beverages, machinery and electrical equipment and
pharmaceutical products.

Overheating?

I have given the good side of the coin but here is the ying to that yang.

In the first ten months of 2017, imports of goods grew by 16.0% year-on-year……..The value of imported goods rises at a more rapid pace than that of exported goods, thus
increasing the foreign trade deficit in goods.

Although in a small country particular care is needed with the data.

a significant contribution to the increase in imports of goods came from purchasing Bombardier CS300 aircrafts. Earlier in 2017, the JSC Air Baltic Corporation purchased
seven aircrafts and by the end of 2017 it had eight aircrafts of this kind.

Also there was this.

According to the data provided by real estate enterprises, price hikes of standard apartments displayed no trend toward acceleration in August and September, and the annual rate of increase remained close to 10%.

Prices moving like that make us look at the credit figures where we see this.

In six months of 2017, i.e. from May to October, new loans to households exceeded the respective indicator of 2016 by 7.0%, including loans for house purchase and consumer
credits which increased by 9.5% and 8.8% respectively. Meanwhile, new loans to nonfinancial corporations posted a 15.3% decrease year-on-year.

So plenty of credit for housing but in a familiar development none for business. Also UK readers especially will wonder about housing affordability when we see what could be described as a Latvian Help To Buy.

Moreover, the state aid programme for families with children to purchase housing, implemented by the JSC “Attīstības finanšu institūcija Altum”, will be expanded from 2018. It is envisaged that about 1 000 young specialists up to 35 years of age could receive aid
for house purchase in 2018.

Comment

Our trip to the Baltics and Latvia gives us food for thought. An economy growing strongly and expected to put up another strong (4.1%) performance this year. The unemployment rate has fallen to 7% although employment has remained pretty stable as we wonder if some joined the migration abroad that has been seen.

In 2000, Latvia’s population stood at 2.38 million. At the start of this year, it was 1.95 million. No other country has had a more precipitous fall in population — 18.2 percent according to U.N. statistics. ( Politico.eu )

Maybe now some will return although the current banking crisis will hardly provide much encouragement and nor will house prices. One thing we do know is that in banking crises the truth is invariably the first casualty.