How is the Swedish experiment going?

These days the headline above no doubt has you thinking about an alternative approach to the Coronavirus pandemic. However, I would also like to remind you that Sweden was at the fore front of applying negative interest-rates to a country and in addition applied them into something of an economic boom. Or if you prefer they applied exactly the reverse of the old saying that the job of a central banker is to take away the punch bowl as the party gets going. Instead they decided to give it a refill.

The first perspective is that for all the past talk of a different approach they now seem to be in the same boat as the rest of us.

During the summer, a recovery was initiated, but in recent months the spread of infection has increased again and restrictions have been tightened in many countries. This setback shows the great uncertainty that the global economic recovery is still facing. The economic prospects for Sweden and abroad have been revised down, and the economy is expected to weaken again in the near term ( Riksbank)

Where do we stand?

This morning Sweden Statistics has updated us.

GDP increased by 4.9 percent in the third quarter, seasonally adjusted and compared with the second quarter. The recovery was mainly driven by increased exports of goods and household consumption following the historic decline in the second quarter. Calendar adjusted and compared with the third quarter of 2019, GDP decreased by 2.5 percent.

This is a relatively good performance compared to what we have become used to and as the paragraph above notes has been driven by this.

Household final consumption increased by 6.3 percent. Consumption of transports, as well as hotel and restaurant services contributed most to this increase……..Exports increased by 11.2 percent and imports increased by 9.2 percent. Overall, net exports contributed upwards to GDP growth by 1.1 percentage points.

The return of the hospitality sector boosted many economies in the third quarter and I note Sweden benefited from trade. Although if we look at the trade detail the numbers were heavily affected by the oil price.

Exports of mineral fuels and electric current decreased by 40 percent in value and by 10 percent in volume. The large difference between the value and volume trends is due to lower prices on petroleum products……….Imports of crude petroleum oils decreased by 45 percent in value and by 17 percent in volume.

The story shifts a little if we take a look at Sweden’s Nordic peers. This morning we have also learnt some more about Finland.

According to Statistics Finland’s preliminary data, the volume 1) of Finland’s gross domestic product increased in July to September by 3.3 per cent from the previous quarter. Compared with the third quarter of 2019, GDP adjusted for working days contracted by 2.7 per cent.

So for all the talk of differences of approach in fact the annual economic change in Finland and Sweden is well within the margin of error. Maybe the real difference here is that they have populations which are spread out.

Looking Ahead

We see that the retail sector saw some growth in October.

In October, the retail trade sales volume increased by 0.5 percent, compared with September 2020. Retail sales in durables increased by 0.9 percent and retail sales in consumables (excluding Systembolaget, the state-owned chain of liquor stores) increased by 0.1 percent.

This meant that the annual picture looked healthy.

In October, the year-on-year growth rate in the volume of retail sales was 3.6 percent in working-day adjusted figures. Retail sales in durables increased by 4.8 percent and retail sales in consumables (excluding Systembolaget) increased by 0.7 percent.

However that was then and this is now according to the Riksbank.

The growth forecasts for the coming six months
have therefore been revised down…. However, high-frequency data show signs that demand is now slowing down again…….GDP is expected to decline again during the fourth quarter and the situation on the labour market to deteriorate further. The forecast assumes that GDP growth will decline also for the first quarter of next year before it
picks up again both abroad and in Sweden during the second quarter.

The Swedes seem yo be preparing for a rough start to next year which does differentiate them as most have yet to get past a contraction in this quarter.

The Riksbank Response

You might think as an enthusiast for negative interest-rates the Riksbank would have rushed to deploy them in 2020. But we have got something rather different.

The repo rate is held unchanged at zero per cent and is expected to remain at this level in the coming years.

So they have cast aside a past central banking orthodoxy but joined in with a new one.The latter is the plan to apply ZIRP ( in this instance literally at 0%) and to say interest-rates will stay there for some years. So not quite as explicit as the US Federal Reserve which has guided towards a period of 3 years but essentially the same tune. The abandoned orthodoxy is the enthusiasm for negative interest-rates which leaves the Riksbank with quite a lot of egg on its face. After all they have applied negative interest-rates in a boom. Then raised them in a period of economic weakness ( unemployment was rising pre pandemic). Now they do not use them in a clear example of a depression.

By contrast they are more than happy to support any borrowing by the Swedish government.

To improve the conditions for a recovery, the Executive Board has decided to expand the envelope for the asset purchases by SEK 200 billion, to a total nominal amount of up to SEK 700 billion, and to extend the asset purchase programme to 31 December 2021. The Executive Board has also decided to increase the pace in the asset purchases during the first quarter of 2021, in relation to the fourth quarter of 2020.

They have also decided to interfere in the private-sector as well.

The Executive Board has moreover decided that the Riksbank will only offer to buy corporate bonds issued by companies deemed to comply with international standards and norms for sustainability.

So another central bank sings along with The Kinks.

And when he does his little rounds
‘Round the boutiques of London Town
Eagerly pursuing all the latest fads and trends
‘Cause he’s a dedicated follower of fashion

If they were an army this would be called mission creep.

Comment

As you can see the Riksbank seems to have pretty much abandoned the interest-rate weapon it previously waved with such abandon. There is an additional nuance to this if we shift from the domestic to the external situation. The Krona has been rising against the Euro. There have been ebbs and flows but the 11.2 of March 2020 has been replaced by 10.2 now. If we note that the Euro has also been firm then the Krona has had a strong 2020 and it is interesting that the Riksbank is ignoring this. Perhaps it thought more QE would help, but as I pointed out earlier this week pretty much everyone is at that game.

But like elsewhere the Riksbank is keen to make borrowing cheaper for its government in a new twist on the word independent. With Sweden being paid to borrow ( ten-year yield is -0.13%) no doubt the government is suitably grateful.

 

 

Does money supply growth feed straight into house prices?

I thought that I would look at things today from a slightly different perspective or to quote the French man in The Matrix series we shall investigate some cause and effect. Let me give you the latest news on the effect.

In Q3 2020, the rise in prices of second-hand dwellings in France (excluding Mayotte) weakened: +0.5% compared to Q2 2020 (provisional seasonally adjusted results), after +1.4% in Q2 and +1.9% in Q1 2019.

Over a year, the rise in prices continued: +5.2%, after +5.6% and +4.9%. As observed since the end of 2016, this increase was more important for flats (+6.5% over the year) than for houses (+4.2%). ( Insee)

The reality of the situation arrives when you look at the overall pattern. We saw negative interest-rates introduced by the ECB in June 2014 and large-scale QE begin in March 2015. After several years of falling house prices we then saw French annual house price growth move into positive territory towards the end of 2015. Since then the rate of growth has tended to rise and is now above 5%. The ECB and Bank of France will of course be noting this down as Wealth Effects a plan which is aided and abetted by the Euro area measure of inflation which conveniently omits owner-occupied housing completely. Apparently the twenty odd years they have had to do something about this is not long enough or something like that.

If we bring this right up to date I am nit especially bothered by the decline in quarterly growth in house prices. After all the background environment is for house price falls and the monetary easing we are about to look at has prevented them so far. Or in an amusing irony we can quote the word “counterfactual” back at the central bankers.

Money Supply

The growth here remains stellar as we look at the measure most affected by all the easing.

Annual growth rate of narrower monetary aggregate M1, comprising currency in circulation and overnight deposits, stood at 13.8% in October, unchanged from previous month.

This is a consequence of buying some 25.5 billion Euros of bonds under the original QE programme ( PSPP) and some 62 billion under the new emergency pandemic one or PEPP. Just to mark you cards looking ahead the latter seems to have accelerated recently from around 15 billion per week to around 20 billion in a possible harbinger of the ECB December decision.

This is a game the ECB has been playing since 2015 when it got M1 growth as high as 11.7% which was part of the push on house prices we looked at above. Annual growth had fallen to around 7% before the last act of Mario Draghi last autumn pushed it back above 8% and now the pandemic response pushed it into double-figures. There is another issue here which was described by Kate Bush.

Be running up that road
Be running up that hill
Be running up that building

The 13.8% growth in October is on a much larger amount. Indeed M1 passed 10 trillion Euros in size in October.

Broad Money

If we go wider in monetary terms we see a similar picture.

Annual growth rate of broad monetary aggregate M3 stood at 10.5% in October 2020, after 10.4% in September 2020

The pattern here is different as the previous moves had struggled to get annual growth much above 5% and now well you can see for yourself.Something of a wall of broad money going somewhere but not into the real economy. As you might expect some of this is the tsunami of narrow money.

Looking at the components’ contributions to the annual growth rate of M3, the narrower aggregate M1 contributed 9.4 percentage points (as in the previous month), short-term deposits other than overnight deposits (M2-M1) contributed 0.4 percentage point (as in the previous month) and marketable instruments (M3-M2) contributed 0.7 percentage point (up from 0.6 percentage point).

The ECB will be pleased with the last component of marketable instruments on two counts. Firstly it can point to it as a response to its actions. Secondly growth in such markets will no doubt lead to a growth in sinecures for past central bankers.

Things then get more awkward because it was only the day before yesterday we noted a  savings ratio of 13.5% in Germany on the third quarter. Well from the numbers below it looks as though businesses are saving too and doing it via their bank accounts.

From the perspective of the holding sectors of deposits in M3, the annual growth rate of deposits placed by households increased to 7.9% in October from 7.7% in September, while the annual growth rate of deposits placed by non-financial corporations decreased to 20.5% in October from 21.1% in September. Finally, the annual growth rate of deposits placed by non-monetary financial corporations (excluding insurance corporations and pension funds) decreased to 7.3% in October from 8.2% in September.

It might be more accurate to say they have received money they cannot spend yet as we see a shift in monetary transmission. This is one of the clearest examples of what in economics is called excess money balances I have ever seen. Except right now neither supposed consequence of growth and inflation can happen much.

Credit

With the various support schemes in place it is hard to know what these numbers are really telling us. We do get a pointer to something we know is happening.

The annual growth rate of credit to general government increased to 20.3% in October from 18.9% in September, while the annual growth rate of credit to the private sector stood at 4.9% in October, unchanged from the previous month.

Credit is flowing to governments and some of it is being passed on.

Comment

We can now look more internationally and see examples of monetary policy affecting asset prices. The United States has given us two examples this week alone.

US home prices climbed the most on record in the third quarter as historically low mortgage rates drove outsized demand, the Federal Housing Finance Agency said in a Tuesday report.

Prices gained 3.1% from their prior-quarter levels, according to the report. The jump also places prices 7.8% higher than their year-ago levels. A seasonally adjusted monthly index of prices gained 1.7% in September. ( Business Insider)

And this.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average hit 30000 for the first time on Tuesday, after a rally of more than 60% from its March lows. ( WSJ)

We can also look to Japan where this morning’s Nikkei 225 close at 26,537 compares with more like 8,000 when the Abenomics experiment began.

The catch is that in terms of money supply there are lots of leads and lags in the system. So we can see some things clearly such as the rise in French house price growth but in other areas the rain has not yet gone. For example the CAC-40 has surged in response to the monetary easing but like the UK FTSE 100 is well below past peaks. Of course another asset market which is French sovereign bonds has gone through the roof such that France is being paid to borrow ( ten-year yield -0.34%) in an example of a direct impact.

Switching to the real economy there will be greater lags right now as the Covid-19 restrictions and lockdowns crunch economies regardless of monetary growth. But if you think about it that only raises the inflationary risks and it is not only the Euro area that puts a Nelsonian blind eye to likely developments.

“The government’s plan to replace RPI with CPIH is a clear case of using the wrong tool for the job…” Our CEO @stianwestlake on the news that the RPI will be aligned to the CPIH in 2030 ( Royal Statistical Society)

Happy Thanksgiving.

What is happening to the economy of Germany?

As both the largest economy and indeed the bellweather for the Euro area Germany is of obvious importance. This morning has brought us more up to date in the state of play. Firstly the statistics office has continued to update its data on the quarter just gone.

WIESBADEN – The gross domestic product (GDP) rose by 8.5% in the third quarter of 2020 compared with the second quarter of 2020 after adjustment for price, seasonal and calendar variations. Thus, the German economy could offset a large part of the massive decline in the gross domestic product recorded in the second quarter of 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic. However, the price-, seasonally and calendar-adjusted GDP was still 4.0% lower in the third quarter of 2020 thanin the fourth quarter of 2019, that is the quarter before the global coronavirus crisis.

That is an improvement of the order of 0.3% on what was previously thought. This does in fact give us a partial V-Shape as you can see below.

In the circumstances that is a reasonably good performance and the statistics office puts it like this.

For the whole EU, Eurostat released a preliminary result of -4.3% for the third quarter of 2020. The United States also recorded a strong decline of their gross domestic product (-2.9%, converted figure) compared with the third quarter of 2019. In contrast, year-on-year GDP growth as published by the People’s Republic of China amounted to 4.9% in the third quarter.

There is another context which is that the German economy had previously been struggling. This began with the 0.2% decline at the opening of 2018 which was claimed to be part of the “Euro Boom”. Economic growth was a mere 1.3% in 2018 which then slowed to 0.6% in 2019 so we can see that there were pre pandemic issues.

The Breakdown

I thought that I would switch to the labour market for this and an ongoing consequence for other areas.

The labour volume of the overall economy, which is the total number of hours worked by all persons in employment, declined even more sharply by 4.0% over the same period.

I am using a measure of underemployment as the international definition of unemployment has simply not worked. Next we can switch to wages.

According to first provisional calculations, the compensation of employees was down by just 0.7% year on year, while property and entrepreneurial income fell sharply by 7.8%. On average, gross wages and salaries per employee fell by 0.4%, while net wages and salaries rose slightly by 0.5%.

So we see a familiar situation of income being supported by the furlough scheme although outside it there has been quite a hit. But as there have been restrictions on spending we see a surge in saving.

According to provisional calculations, the savings ratio was 13.5% in the third quarter of 2020.

We wait to see what will be the full economic impact of a surge in involuntary saving but here is the flip side.

Household final consumption expenditure at current prices, however, showed a decrease of 4.0%.

What about now?

This morning has brought the latest update from the Ifo Institute.

Munich, November 24, 2020 – Sentiment among German managers has deteriorated. The ifo Business Climate
Index fell from 92.5 points in October to 90.7 points in November. The drop was due above all to companies’
considerably more pessimistic expectations. Their assessments of the current situation were also a little worse.
Business uncertainty has risen. The second wave of coronavirus has interrupted Germany’s economic recovery.

It is the services sector which has taken the brunt of this.

In the service sector, the Business Climate Index dropped noticeably. For the first time since June, it is back in
negative territory. Assessments of the current situation are much less positive than they were. Moreover,
substantially more companies are pessimistic about the coming months. The indicators for hotels and
hospitality absolutely nosedived.

The one area which has managed some growth is manufacturing.

This month’s bright spot is manufacturing. The business climate improved here, with companies assessing their
current situation as markedly better. Incoming orders rose, albeit more slowly than last month. However,
expectations for the coming months turned notably less optimistic.

Although as you can see the new restrictions due to Covid-19 have affected expectations. But the picture for the overall economy was that things continued to improve in October but have now reversed. So the vaccine news has not impacted expectations there yet and the V-Shape above will see at least a kink. The general view is similar to that given yesterday by the Matkit business survey.

New lockdown measures to curb the spread of
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to an
accelerated decline in services activity across
Germany in November, latest ‘flash’ PMI®
from IHS Markit showed. However, the country’s
manufacturing sector continued to exhibit strong
growth, helping to support overall economic activity.

They did however hint that the Far East is helping German manufacturing.

which the survey shows is
benefitting for growing sales to Asia in particular.

Financial Conditions

These remain extraordinarily easy. There is the -0.5% deposit rate of the ECB with the -1% interest-rate for the banks. Then there is the enormous amount of bond buying which under the original programme ( PSPP) totaled some 562 billion Euros at the end of October. It is a sign of the times that there is another buying programme as well as the ECB tries to muddy the waters and as of the end of September it had bought another 125 billion.

Today Germany issues a two-year bond and it will be paid to do so as the yield is -0.75% as I type this. Furthermore this yield has been negative for over 5 years now as that state of play looks ever more permanent. Indeed with the thirty-year at -0.16% the whole yield curve is negative.

Switching to the Euro exchange-rate things are not so bright. If we take a long-term context Germany joined to get a weaker exchange-rate. However in recent times it has been rising and the effective index is at 121.5 or 21% higher than when the Euro began. Whilst November has seen a dip the index started 2020 at 115.

Comment

The context is that at the end of the third quarter the German economy had grown by 2.7% compared to the 2015 benchmark. But the news restrictions mean that it has “And it’s gone” to quote South Park. There are vaccine hopes for 2021 now but 2020 looks like being a year to forget.

This brings us to the role of the ECB which is already heavily deployed. Can it respond to the latest dip? Not in any timely way as we note the lags in the system. Also for Germany there is not a lot more that can be done in terms of interest-rates or bond yields as all are heavily negative. The wheels of fiscal policy are being oiled by this as well. Looking at it like that only leaves us with the Euro exchange-rate. Can ECB President Lagarde fire a “bazooka” at that? As I pointed out yesterday looking at the UK with all central banks easing that is easier to say than do.

Meanwhile returning to the world of finance there is this.

FRANKFURT (Reuters) – Germany’s blue-chip DAX index will expand to 40 from the current 30 companies with tougher membership criteria, exchange operator Deutsche Boerse said on Tuesday.

In general a good idea as it is too narrow an index for an economy the size of Germany, especially in the light of this.

The most recent departure was payments company Wirecard, which in a blow to Germany’s capital markets, filed for insolvency just two years after its promotion to the index. The payments company owed creditors billions in what auditor EY described as a sophisticated global fraud.

The perils of indexation?

 

 

It is a sign of the times that Bitcoin is doing so well

The past week or two has seen quite a rally in the price of Bitcoin and as I type this it is US $16.700. This gives various perspectives and let me open with a bit of hype, or at least what I think is hype.

An independent report from Citi Bank’s Managing Director argues that Bitcoin is the digital gold of the 21st century. The devaluation of the worlds’ reserve currency—the U.S. dollar—formed the basis of the commentary. ( Crypto.Com)

As a starter Citibank have suggested that the US Dollar will fall or depreciate by 20% which has created something of a stir in itself. There are bears around for plenty of currencies tight now as others suggested that the expected December move by the ECB might put the skids under the Euro. Both roads would look bullish for Bitcoin as it is an alternative. The Citibank view starts with a comparison with Gold post Bretton Woods.

With a relatively free currency market, gold’s price grew enormously for the next 50 years.

The monetary inflation and devaluation of the greenback are the basis of Fitzpatricks’ comparison of Bitcoin with gold. ( Crypto.Com)

This is then linked to what we have seen with Bitcoin.

Bitcoin move happened in the aftermath of the Great Financial crisis (of 2008) which saw a new change in the monetary regime as we went to ZERO percent interest rates.

The next step is this.

Fitzpatrick pointed out that the first bull cycle in Bitcoin from 2011 to 2013 when it increased by 555 times resulted from this.
Currently, the COVID-19 crisis and the government’s associated monetary and fiscal response are creating a similar market environment as gold in the 1970s. Governments have made it clear that they will not shy away from unprecedented money printing until the GDP and employment numbers are back up.  ( Crypto.Com)

He then applies his technical analysis.

“You look at price action being much more symmetrical or so over the past seven years forming what looks like a very well defined channel giving us an up move of similar time frame to the last rally (in 2017).”

Which leads to this.

Fitzpatrick did not stop there; his price prediction chart sees Bitcoin price at $318,000 by December 2021.  ( Crypto.Com)

That in itself will no doubt be contributing to the present rise as it puts us in what is called FOMO or Fear Of Missing Out territory.

The Economics

The issue of the money supply and its growth is an issue of these times whereas the situation for Bitcoin is different.

Bitcoin’s total supply is limited by its software and will never exceed 21,000,000 coins. New coins are created during the process known as “mining”: as transactions are relayed across the network, they get picked up by miners and packaged into blocks, which are in turn protected by complex cryptographic calculations. ( coinmarketcap.com)

So there are two differences. Firstly there is a cap and with the present number in circulation being 18.5 million it is not that far away. Secondly whilst there is growth the process of creation is likely to be slower rather than fiat money which as I am about to discuss has been rather up,up and away.

If we start with the world’s reserve currency which is the US Dollar I note a reference to money printing in the Citibank report which we could argue is QE.

Consistent with this directive, the Desk plans to continue to increase SOMA holdings of Treasury securities by approximately $80 billion per month……Similarly, the Desk plans to continue to increase SOMA holdings of agency MBS by approximately $40 billion per month. ( New York Fed)

So we have US $120 billion a month from the main two efforts where bonds are swapped for electronically produced money.

My preferred way of looking at this is the money supply and if we do that we see that in the year to the 2nd of this month the narrow measure of the US money supply has risen by 41% over the past year. This sort of measure used to be called high powered money although right now due to the plunge in velocity it is anything but. However it has been created and I also note that having gone through US $2 trillion in August the amount of cash in circulation is also rising and was US $2.04 trillion in October. So mud in the eye for those predicting its death,especially as we note the switches to using electronic money in retail. As the Belle Stars put it.

This is the sign of the times
Piece of more to come

If we go to the wider money supply measure called M2 we see that it has grown by 23.9% in the year to November 2nd. That is quite something for a number that is now just shy of 19 trillion. So there is a money supply argument in the background. We can add to it by noting fast rises in other types of fiat money. Japan has been at the game for some time and we have seen notable expansions in Euros and UK Pounds as well.

Interest-rates

There was a time that the lack of an interest-rate from Bitcoin was a weakness. The 0% compared unfavourably to what you could get in fiat currencies. After all pre credit crunch many of the major currencies provided interest-rates of 4 to 5%. But now life is very different as we have seen the US Federal Reserve cut interest-rates to just above 0%. Indeed in some cases now Bitcoin has a relative advantage because the spread of not only negative official interest-rates but of negative bond yields ( which total around US $17 trillion now) makes it look much more attractive than before.

Who would have thought that a 0% interest-rate would be attractive? But increasingly that is true.

Comment

When we look at something like this we see that it requires a combination of reality and psychology/belief. The former gets reinforced because as I have pointed out over the past decade the direction of travel has been both clear and consistent. This morning has seen an example of part of this journey.

Italy’s Ruling 5-Star: ECB Should Cancel Covid-Related Debt It Owns – Party Blog Doing So Would Be “Not Only Fair But Easily Achievable” ( @LiveSquawk )

These sort of proposals appear and will no doubt be denied and rejected. But in a year or two’s time past history suggests it may well be on the agenda and then get implemented. It is quite a cynical game but we see it played regularly and feeds into our “To Infinity! And Beyond” theme.

Also there will be demand from those looking to park what are considered to be ill gotten gains. The official response will be around crime but it is probably more likely to be another version of this.

Many Turkish companies and individuals bought foreign currency last week even as the lira registered its biggest weekly gain in almost two decades, Bloomberg reported, citing currency traders it did not identify. ( Ahval )

Turks are using the Lira rally as a chance to buy more US Dollars in a clear safe haven trade. People will disagree about how safe that is but there will be similar flows into Bitcoin. It has its own risks as we note the issues around security and the wide swings in price. The latter are something of an irony because they are exacerbated by a strength which is the supply restrictions and limit. But this is a time of risk in so many areas.

Another way of looking at the change in perception of Bitcoin is the way that central banks are now looking at Digital Coins in a type of spoiler move as it poses a potential challenge to their monopoly over money.

I will be particularly interested in reader’s thoughts on this topic

 

 

It is party time at The Tokyo Whale as the Japanese stock market surges

Sometimes you have to wait for things and be patient and this morning has seen an example of that. If we look east to the and of the rising sun we see that it has been a while since it was at the level below.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 stock index closed on Friday at its highest level since November 1991 as individual investors bought up the shares of blue-chip companies at the expense of smaller, more speculative groups. The benchmark, which has been described by some analysts as a “barbarous relic” but remains the favourite yardstick of Japanese retail investors, was propelled to its 29-year high by resurgent stocks like Sony, SoftBank and Uniqlo parent Fast Retailing.

That is from the Financial Times over the weekend and its Japanese owners will no doubt be pointing out that it should be covering this morning’s further rally.

Investing.com – Japan stocks were higher after the close on Monday, as gains in the Paper & PulpRailway & Bus and Real Estate sectors led shares higher.

At the close in Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 rose 2.12% to hit a new 5-year high.

Curiously Investing.com does not seem to have spotted that we have not been here for much longer than 5 years. The market even challenged 25,000 but did not quite make it.

There was something familiar about this but also something new as the FT explained.

Mizuho Securities chief equity strategist Masatoshi Kikuchi said that the Nikkei’s move was driven by individual investors using leverage to magnify their potential returns and losses — a much larger and more active group since the Covid-19 pandemic restricted millions to their homes and prompted many to open online trading accounts.

The Japanese are savers and investors hence the Mrs. Watanabe stereotype but the gearing here reminds us of the Robinhood style investors in the US as well.

The Tokyo Whale

As ever if we look below the surface there has been much more going on and we can start at the Bank of Japan which regular readers will be aware has been buying equities for a while now.Also it increased its purchases in response to the Covid-19 pandemic in two ways. It did not just buy on down days and it also increased its clip size.

For the time being, it would actively purchase ETFs and J-REITs so that their amounts outstanding would increase
at annual paces with the upper limit of about 12 trillion yen and about 180 billion yen, respectively. ( Bank of Japan Minutes)

In October it bought 70 billion Yen’s worth on six occasions and on three days in a row from the 28th. If we recall that world stock markets were falling back then we find ourselves noting the most extreme version of a central bank put option for equity markets we have seen so far. Indeed this is confirmed in the Minutes.

With a view to lowering risk premia of asset prices in an appropriate manner, the Bank might increase or
decrease the amount of purchases, depending on market conditions.

What is appropriate and how do they decide? This morning’s summary of opinions release suggests that some at the Bank of Japan are troubled by all of this. The emphasis is mine.

It is necessary to continue with active purchases of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and Japan real estate investment trusts (J-REITs) for the time being. However, given that monetary easing is expected to be prolonged, the Bank should further look for ways to enhance sustainability of the policy measure so that it will not face difficulty in conducting such purchases when a lowering of risk premia of asset prices is absolutely necessary.

As “monetary easing” has been going on for around 3 decades now it has already been very prolonged. I wonder on what grounds they would regard it as “absolutely necessary” to reduce the value of its large equity holdings. As of the end of October it had bought some 34,771,759,339,000 Yen of it.

Rather curiously the Bank of Japan share price has not responded to the rise in value of its equity holdings. Yes it was up 1.9% today to 26,780 but that is a long way short of the 220,000 or so of November 1991.

The Bank is a juridical person established based on the Bank of Japan Act. Its stated capital is 100 million yen. The issued share capital is owned by the government (55 percent) and the private sector (45 percent).

Abenomics

There is something of an irony in this landmark being reached after Prime Minister Abe has left office. Because as well as the explicit equity buying effort above there were a lot of implicit boosts for the equity market from what became called Abenomics. Back in November 2012 I put it like this.

Also the Japanese stock market has had a good couple of days in response to this and has got back above the 9000 level on the Nikkei 225 at a time when other stock markets have fallen.

As you can see the market has been singing along to Chic in the Abenomics era.

Good times, these are the good times
Leave your cares behind, these are the good times
Good times, these are the good times
Our new state of mind, these are the good times
Happy days are here again
The time is right for makin’ friends.

We have seen interest-rates reduced into negative territory and the Bank of Japan gorge itself on Japanese Government Bonds both of which make any equity dividends more attractive. Also there was the Abenomics “arrow” designed to reduce the value of the Japanese Yen and make Japan’s exporters more competitive. Often the Japanese stock market is the reverse of that day’s move in the Yen but in reverse so Yen down means stick market up.

The latter gave things quite a push at first as the exchange-rate to the US Dollar went from 78 into the mid 120s for a while. However in more recent times the Yen has been mimicking The Terminator by saying “I’ll be back” and is at 103.60 as I type this. There is a lot of food for thought here on the impact of QE on a currency but for our purposes today we see that the currency is weaker but by much less than one might have thought.

Comment

The Japanese stock market has recently received boost from other influences. For example what is becoming called the “Biden Bounce” has seen the Nikkei 225 rally by around 8% in a week. Also this morning’s data with the leading indicator for September rising to 92.9 will have helped. But also we have seen an extraordinary effort by the Japanese state to get the market up over the past 8 years. In itself it has been a success but it does raise problems.

The first is that Japan’s economic problems have not gone away as a result of this. Even if we out the Covid pandemic to one side the economy was struggling in response to the Consumption Tax rise of last autumn. The official objective of raising the inflation rate has got no nearer and the “lost decade” rumbles on. The 0.1% have got a lot wealthier though.

Then there is the issue of an exit strategy, because if The Tokyo Whale stops buying and the market drops there are two problems. First for the value of the Bank of Japan’s holdings and next for the economy itself. So as so often we find ourselves singing along with Elvis Presley.

We’re caught in a trap
I can’t walk out
Because I love you too much, baby

Meanwhile on a personal level I recall these days as I worked for Barings pre collapse.

Baring Nikkei options in the money now! ( @WildboyMarkets)

Indeed I had an indirect role as there were 4 of us on the futures and options desk and we feared trouble and left. So they promoted Nick Leeson from the back office and what happened next became famous even leading to a film.

Podcast

 

Will the Bank of England give us negative interest-rates?

Later today the members of the Monetary Policy Committee ( MPC) of the Bank of England will cast their votes as to what they think monetary policy will be and as I shall explain this is a live meeting. As in I expect changes today. Unfortunately due to a change made by the previous Governor Mark Carney we will not know the result until tomorrow at midday. Remember when all of this began to be called Super Thursday and then invariably turned out to be anything but?! Tomorrow will be one as we also get the Inflation Report to update us on what is expected for the economy. But the crucial point here is that the preference for bureaucratic convenience means that we are at risk of “some animals being more equal than others” as George Orwell put it so aptly. That risk is added to by the way the ship of state is such a leaky vessel these days.

The economy

The Minutes from the September meeting suggested things were better than expected.

UK GDP in July was around 18½% above its trough in April and around 11½% below its 2019 Q4 level. High-frequency payments data suggest that consumption has continued to recover during the summer and is now at around its start-of-year level in aggregate, stronger than expected in the August Report. Investment intentions have remained very weak and uncertainties among businesses are elevated. For 2020 Q3 as a whole, Bank staff expect GDP to be around 7% below its 2019 Q4 level, less weak than had been expected in the August Report.

Since then some of that has remained true as for example UK Retail Sales have continued to be strong. But as time passed we began to see more and more Covid-19 restrictions applied, first regionally and now including as of midnight all of England.

This morning’s Markit PMI business survey tells us this.

October data indicates that the UK service sector was close
to stalling even before the announcement of lockdown 2
in England, with tighter restrictions on hospitality, travel
and leisure leading to a slump in demand for consumer facing businesses. This was only partly offset by sustained expansion in areas related to digital services, business-to business sales and housing market transactions.

So the existing restrictions had clipped the tails of the service sector. So we are left with a pattern of a manufacturing recovery and very slow services growth followed by an expectation of this.

November’s lockdown in England and a worsening
COVID-19 situation across the rest of Europe means that the UK economy seems on course for a double-dip recession this winter and a far more challenging path to recovery in 2021.

There are issues with the credibility of the PMIs after some misfires but they are relevant because the Bank of England follows them. Some of you may recall Deputy Governor Ben Broadbent guiding us towards sentiment indices like them in the autumn of 2016. The absent-minded professor seems untroubled by the fact that led him up the garden path. Also I am intrigued by them discussing the risk of a double-dip recession when this is in fact a depression with the only issue being how long it will last?

Impact of Lockdown 2

The National Institute for Economic and Social Research or NIESR thinks this.

The second wave of the virus, and newly announced November lockdown, are likely to further increase the fall in 2020 GDP to around 11-12 per cent. This includes a fall of
around 3 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2020, with additional public borrowing but a slower rise in unemployment due to the extension of the furlough scheme.

Later they refine some of this although we are in the territory of spurious accuracy.

Saturday’s announcement of a further he November lockdown in response to resurgent Covid-19 will push
growth in the fourth quarter negative, to an estimated -3.3 per cent.

So we have a change to what we were expecting because we had our concerns about the end of the furlough scheme and its impact on employment and wages which would have knock-on effects elsewhere in the economy. That now will come in early December (probably as we are not sure when the lockdown will end) but in the meantime the lockdown will push economic output around 3% lower.

Another consideration for the Bank of England will be the labour market explicitly.

Our main case scenario was for unemployment to rise to above 7 per cent in the final quarter of 2020 and 8 per cent in the first half of 2021 as the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) ends: the extension in November will have reduced this at the end of 2020 but may just have
postponed it. Unemployment is expected to rise above 5 per cent until 2024, with long-term persistent unemployment exacerbated by the prospect of a long and uncertain recovery.

Of course it has been a troubled area for them as back in the early days of Forward Guidance they established an unemployment rate of 6.5% as being significant for interest-rate rises and then ignored it.

Looking ahead which is what the Bank of England should be doing today, this looks rather tenuous on the vaccine front. We do not know when or indeed if one will be ready? Also individuals may be less than keen on being injected with something about which the long-term implications cannot be known.

Comment

The analysis suggests more easing is on its way and the first part is easy. These days the role of monetary policy is primarily to encourage fiscal policy by making it as cheap as possible. Today will see another £1.473 billion spent by the Bank of England buying UK government bonds aiming at that objective. But it is running out of road on its present plan because as of the end of today it will have spent some £697 billion out of the £725 billion it has authourised. That is only about another 6 weeks worth at the current rate. Just for the avoidance of doubt the £745 billion figure often quoted includes  £20 billion of corporate bonds which is now all over bar the shouting.

So the easy bit is a vote in favour of another £100 billion of QE which kicks the can comfortably into 2021. They could do more but that takes away some of the opportunity to act or rather looking like they are acting in the future. Regular readers will know I have been expecting an extra £100 billion for a while now as this is simply implicit funding of the government.

The path for Bank Rate is more complex. I still think a move is unlikely but cannot rule out they might be silly enough to cut Bank Rate to 0%. After all with all the rate cuts we have seen another 0.1% would be pretty much laughable. As to a cut into negative interest-rates that would look rather silly when their enquiry into them is not yet complete. However some of the MPC would vote for them and the way things are looking they could easily panic and give us a negative Bank Rate in 2021. Just as a reminder we already have negative bond yields in the UK out to the 6 year maturity. Due to the way that fixed-rate mortgages have become much more popular they are as significant as Bank Rate these days.

 

 

 

Central bank Digital Coins are to enforce negative interest-rates

The weekend just gone produced quite a lot of news. Another lockdown in the UK is in the offing and there is of course the not so small matter of tomorrow’s US election. But something that does not make such headlines was also very significant and it came from ECB President Christine Lagarde.

We’ve started exploring the possibility of launching a digital euro. As Europeans are increasingly turning to digital in the ways they spend, save and invest, we should be prepared to issue a digital euro, if needed. I’m also keen to hear your views on it.

Actually it looks as though they have already decided and are launching a public consultation as cover for the exercise. After all most will not understand what are the real consequences of this especially as it will be presented as being modern and something which is happening anyway. The Covid-19 pandemic has provided a push for electronic forms of payment which is really rather convenient for this purpose. So they have a good chance of getting support and if they do not well they will simply ignore it. I must say it is hard not to laugh at the “if needed” because it is the central bankers as I shall explain who need it and not the Euro areas consumers and savers.

The real problem is highlighted here.

The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic came as a deep shock to all of us and warranted fast policy responses. I’m proud to say that we’ve delivered: our measures have been providing crucial support to the eurozone economy and to European citizens.

It is the first sentence which applies here although I have to say the tone deaf nature of “we’ve delivered” in the second is pretty shocking. The ECB already had problems with the Euro area economy as the “Euroboom” faded and growth was not only poor but the largest economy and indeed bell weather Germany was struggling. Then the pandemic hit and made everything worse.

The ECB’s Problem

This arises from the fact that in response to the issues above it has used so many monetary policy options. It was as long ago as June 2014 that it introduced negative interest-rates and there have been further reductions since. Its Deposit Rate is now -0.5% and via the TLTROs it has reduced its interest-rates for the banks to -1%. This is a crucial point in today’s narrative because they feel they cannot keep interest-rates at these negative levels without throwing some free fish to the banks. There is a lot of irony here because interest-rates were cut to help the banks but the supposed cure has turned out to be poison at the dosages required. You do not need to take my word for it just tale a look at bank’s share prices. For example my old employer Deutsche Bank has a share price which has nudged over 8 Euros this morning which is around half of what it was in early 2017 and well you do the maths in the fall from this.

The all-time high Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft stock closing price was 159.59 on May 11, 2007. ( macrotrends.net )

So the banks are struggling with negative interest-rates as they are which poses a problem for a central bank wanted to go lower or in the new buzzword be “recalibrated”.

The Plan

Actually the ECB was part of a group of central banks which asked the Bank for International Settlements to look into this issue in January.

In jurisdictions where cash use is declining and digitalisation is increasing, CBDC could also play an important role in maintaining access to, and expanding the utility of, central bank money. ( CBDC = Central Bank Digital Coin)

As that is not a problem they are up to something else here. Also they are worried that it might make the problem they are supposed to stop worse.

There are two main concerns: first that, in times of financial crisis, the existence of a CBDC could enable larger
and faster bank runs; and second, and more generally, that a shift from retail deposits into CBDC
(“disintermediation”) could lead banks to rely on more expensive and less stable sources of funding.

In the end it is always about the banks in their role as The Precious. I think we get more of the truth here.

CBDC may offer opportunities that are not possible with cash. A convenient and accessible
CBDC could serve as an alternative to potentially unsafe forms of private money, offer users privacy, reduce
illegal activity, facilitate fiscal transfers and/or enable “programmable money”. Yet these opportunities may
involve trade-offs and unless these have a bearing on a central bank’s mandate (eg through threatening
confidence in the currency), they will be secondary motivations for central banks.

To my mind the opportunities are for central bankers and not for us.

The IMF lets the cat out of the bag

Back in February 2019 it told us this.

In a cashless world, there would be no lower bound on interest rates. A central bank could reduce the policy rate from, say, 2 percent to minus 4 percent to counter a severe recession.

I am sure you have already spotted why the ECB is now on the case. As to cash it turns out it has a feature which makes central bankers hate it. This is simply that it offers 0% which as the IMF explains below is a barrier to central bank “innovation”,

When cash is available, however, cutting rates significantly into negative territory becomes impossible. Cash has the same purchasing power as bank deposits, but at zero nominal interest. Moreover, it can be obtained in unlimited quantities in exchange for bank money. Therefore, instead of paying negative interest, one can simply hold cash at zero interest. Cash is a free option on zero interest, and acts as an interest rate floor.

There is an irony in this as by doing nothing it has turned out to be a powerful tool. The central bankers will be furious at the advice given by the rather prescient Steve Miller Band.

Hoo-hoo-hoo, go on, take the money and run
Go on, take the money and run
Hoo-hoo-hoo, go on, take the money and run
Go on, take the money and run.

Banning a song usually only makes it more popular. That would also be true of cash I suspect.

Comment

As so often what we are told is very different to what is the plan. A central bank digital coin is a way of imposing even deeper negative interest-rates. The IMF gave a template for this below.

To illustrate, suppose your bank announced a negative 3 percent interest rate on your bank deposit of 100 dollars today. Suppose also that the central bank announced that cash-dollars would now become a separate currency that would depreciate against e-dollars by 3 percent per year. The conversion rate of cash-dollars into e-dollars would hence change from 1 to 0.97 over the year. After a year, there would be 97 e-dollars left in your bank account. If you instead took out 100 cash-dollars today and kept it safe at home for a year, exchanging it into e-money after that year would also yield 97 e-dollars.

This brings us back to the ECB which last week told us this.

this recalibration exercise will touch on all our instruments. It is not going to be one or the other. It is not going to be looking at one single instrument. It will be looking at all our instruments, how they interact together, what will be the optimal outcome, and what will be the mix that will best address the situation.

It fears that further interest-rate cuts could cause a bank run. I agree with that and have written before that somewhere around -1.5% to -2% seems likely to be the threshold. Thus any more cuts will bring them near that especially as the LTRO rate is already -1%. So in their view a new plan is required and some of you may already be mulling their existing plan to phase out the 500 Euro note which is their highest denomination.

Putting this another way they are worried by two developments. One is Bitcoin which potentially challenges the monopoly power of central banks and also the demand for cash is rising not falling. In the Euro area it was 1.33 trillion Euros in September as opposed to 1.2 trillion a year before.

Podcast

Can the ECB save the Euro area economy?

The last day or so has brought economic activity in the Euro area into focus. Last night brought a reminder that November was going to be difficult in France via all the reports of the traffic logjam in Paris as Parisians tried to find somewhere else to spend the new lockdown. We also had the ECB policy meeting of which more later as first we get to see what happened in the third quarter for the 2 biggest economies. France was first to release its numbers.

In Q3 2020, GDP in volume terms bounced back: +18.2% after –13.7% in Q2 2020. Nevertheless, GDP remained well below the level it had before the health crisis: measured in volume, compared to its level in Q3 2019 (year-on-year), GDP of Q3 2020 was 4.3% lower.

Yet again the expectations of analysts were wrong ( much too low) in spite of the fact that the theme was effective leaked by ECB President Lagarde in the press conference yesterday. After all she would have known the numbers.

Lagarde: As you know, the number for the third quarter will be coming out I believe tomorrow, and might surprise on the upside.

The bit that was a surprise to me was this at a time of large government intervention.

while general government expenditure slightly exceeded it (+0.4% year-on-year).

Moving on we saw Germany next to release its numbers.

WIESBADEN – The gross domestic product (GDP) rose by 8.2% in the third quarter of 2020 on the second quarter of 2020 after adjustment for price, seasonal and calendar variations……GDP in the third quarter of 2020 was down a price-ajusted 4.1% on the third quarter of 2019 (price- and calendar-adjusted: -4.3%).

So at this point we have a similar pattern with a fall of around 4% which means we are Looking at numbers around 1% worse that the USA. I note that Italy has fallen into the same pattern.

In the third quarter of 2020 the seasonally and calendar adjusted, chained volume measure of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increased by 16.1 per cent with respect to the previous quarter, whereas it decreased by 4.7 per cent over the same quarter of 2019.

Both typically and sadly our Girlfriend in a coma has down slightly worse, but there is a need to take care as the numbers will be less accurate than usual due to collection difficulties. Also if there is ever a tear where seasonal adjustment will be inaccurate this is it and that is before we get to the impact of issues like this.

The third quarter of 2020 has had four working days more than the previous quarter and one working day
more than the same quarter of previous year.

More Trouble?

We got a hint of things turning for the worse from the German retail sales release.

WIESBADEN – According to provisional data, turnover in retail trade in September 2020 was in real terms 2.2% and in nominal terms 2.6% (both adjusted for calendar and seasonal influences) lower than in August 2020.

As you can see one of the factors driving the German economy forwards looks to have weakened at the end of the quarter. The annual comparison still looks strong but we need to take around 3% away from it to allow for the extra day.

In September 2020, the turnover in retail rose by 6.5% (real) and 7.7% (nominal) compared to the same month of the previous year, where the September 2020 had one day of sale more. In comparison to February 2020, the month before the outbreak of Covid 19 in Germany, the turnover in September 2020 was 2.8% higher.

What next for the ECB?

As I pointed out earlier the ECB will have been aware that the third quarter in isolation had outperformed. But it was also aware that the passage to the end of the year and maybe beyond was not. That has been confirmed by its survey of professional forecasters this morning.

However, due to the emergence of new COVID-19 cases in the recent weeks, many forecasters now assumed a weaker fourth quarter 2020 and that the economy would remain affected by restrictions (albeit not complete lockdowns) well into 2021.

That in essence is the shift we are seeing and let me add that it puts 2021 on a weak opening and also what if the lockdown cycle repeats again?

The ECB response was as we expected to kick the can to its next meeting.

The full Governing Council was in total agreement to analyse the current economic situation and to recognise and acknowledge the fact that risks are clearly, clearly tilted to the downside. We all acknowledge the role and the importance as a driving force of the pandemic and the increase of contagion, as well as the impact that containment measures will have on the economy. So it is with that recognition and that acknowledgement that we agreed, all of us, that it was necessary to take action, and therefore to recalibrate our instruments at our next Governing Council meeting. ( President Lagarde )

Perhaps the most revealing bit here was the shift of language as “tools” have morphed into “instruments”. That may turn out to be like the way “The Troika” became “The Institutions” as things went from bad to worse in Greece.

Then we got more from Christine Lagarde.

So the teams, the committees, staff members are already at work in order to do this recalibration exercise, and this recalibration exercise will touch on all our instruments. It is not going to be one or the other. It is not going to be looking at one single instrument. It will be looking at all our instruments, how they interact together, what will be the optimal outcome, and what will be the mix that will best address the situation.

I do love the way this is presented as a scientific enterprise! But suddenly quite a few extra things are in play via the mention of “all our instruments”. For example another interest-rate now looks to be in play. Maybe the ECB might buy more private-sector instruments such as equities too. Up to now it has only bought bonds,but should the equity market falls continue maybe it will spread its wings. I suggested back on March the 2nd that it could be the next central bank to but equities and it seems such thoughts have arrived at the Financial Times.

“New Instruments” If BOJ is the blueprint, ECB already buy government, corporates bonds and commercial paper. One thing missing… stock ETFs? ( Stephen Spratt)

Comment

We see that the ECB is strongly hinting that it is preparing what has become called a Bazooka although I suppose in the circumstances Panzerfaust may be better. But if we look at what is its main policy tool right now it is already pretty much flat out.

But, according to calculations by Citigroup, ECB purchases will more than cover the extra cash that governments need in 2021 — even if the central bank does not scale up its €1.35tn emergency bond-buying programme by another €500bn in December as is widely expected. Christine Lagarde, the ECB’s president, hinted at a policy-setting meeting on Thursday that further stimulus is on the way. (Financial Times)

Actually to my mind the precise figures do not matter because if there is a miss match and bond yields start to rise I expect the ECB to raise its rate of purchases. The numbers above omit the 20 billion Euros a month of the pre-exisiting QE scheme but as I just said the principle here is that they will implicitly ( they do not buy in the primary market) finance the deficits.

The ongoing problem remains that there is never any exit strategy as highlighted from Japan earlier this week.

BOJ’S GOV. KURODA: THE ETF PURCHASES WILL CONTINUE TO BE A NECESSARY POLICY TOOL. ( @FinancialJuice )

 

 

 

 

 

 

The ECB has found itself pushing on a string

Our focus today shifts to the Euro area where to quote Todd Terry there is indeed “something going on”. We find that the European Central Bank can influence one area of the economy and here it is.

Annual growth rate of narrower monetary aggregate M1,, comprising currency in circulation and overnight deposits, increased to 13.8% in September from 13.2% in August.

For newer readers wondering if this is high then the answer is yes. The ECB did not reach such annual rates of growth in either of its two main pushes. So the slashing of interest-rates in response to the credit crunch and later the imposition of negative interest-rates and mainstream QE bond purchases did not reach this level of percentage expansion. The next context is that the narrow money supply is much larger now so in terms of Euros around ( on this measure) the push is a real shove.

If we look back we see that there has been a two-stage move with the initial one beginning on the 18th of September last year with the interest-rate cut to -0.5% and the restarting of QE bond purchases. It is hard not to have a wry smile at the thought that back then Mario Draghi was setting policy for his successor Christine Lagarde in a revealing summary of the competence of someone he knows well. Life has sure moved on in the meantime as she is now in a full blown crisis! This move raised M1 growth from 7% to 8% in broad terms. The turbocharger was applied in March and we have gone to three months in a row of growth over 13%. Let me give you an example of the turbocharger in action and remember these are just for last week.

ECB PSPP (EUR): +6.733B To 2.309T (Prev -1.883B To 2.303T) –

CSPP: +2.208B To 241.524B (Prev +2.137B To 239.316B) – CBPP: +722M To 287.426B (Prev -81M To 286.704B) – ABSPP: -206M To 29.173B (Prev +222M To 29.379B) – PEPP: +16.264B To 616.856B (Prev +15.858B To 600.592B)

Firstly apologies for the alphabetti spaghetti, I am sure the names sound grand when they make them up. The original QE programme is at the top and added nearly 7 billion Euros and the emergency one at the bottom added a bit over 16 billion. They also bought over 2 billion Euros of Corporate Bonds. But in total as the ECB supplied Euros in return for the bonds roughly 26 billion was added to the money supply in one week.

Velocity

I often get asked about this and the concept here is to attempt to measure what happens to the money supply. We cannot measure it directly so the proxy is usually our measure of economic output called Gross Domestic Product. The credit crunch era has seen plenty on monetary expansion but only weak GDP growth so velocity has been singing along with Alicia Keys.

I, I, I, I’m fallin’
I, I, I, I’m fallin’
Fall

This has in the past been described as being like pushing on a string.

If we now bring this up to date we see that Velocity has had a shocker with narrow money growth of a bit over 12% combined with GDP growth of nearly minus 12%. There will be quite a swing in the third quarter as we see quite a bounce back but looking ahead to this quarter things are getting worse again. I have previously suggested the Euro area may contract again this quarter and with the implementation of ever more restrictions in response to the Corona Virus pandemic the economic clouds are gathering. Yesterday brought more news on this front from a country which has had relative success in dealing with the pandemic.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel is planning a nationwide “lockdown light” which could force the closure of bars, restaurants and public events, according to Bild newspaper.

Merkel is expected to push for the measure in a meeting with regional leaders on Wednesday where additional curbs are likely to be decided on. ( Euronews).

Belgium seems to be in a pretty awful mess and playing a new version of Catch-22.

Now 10 hospitals have requested that staff who have tested positive but do not have symptoms keep working.

The head of the Belgian Association of Medical Unions told the BBC they had no choice if they were to prevent the hospital system collapsing within days.

I never thought I would be analysing money velocity in this way but it will be another plunge if as looks likely now the economy shrinks again with M1 growth of the order of 13%.

Broad Money

The heat is on here too.

The annual growth rate of the broad monetary aggregate M3 increased to 10.4% in September 2020 from 9.5% in August, averaging 10.0% in the three months up to September.

As you are probably expecting much of the shove here came from the narrow money we have just looked at.

the narrower aggregate M1 contributed 9.4 percentage points (up from 9.0 percentage points in August), short-term deposits other than overnight deposits (M2-M1) contributed 0.4 percentage point (up from 0.1 percentage point) and marketable instruments (M3-M2) contributed 0.6 percentage point (up from 0.4 percentage point).

The ECB will be pleased to see a pick-up in the rate of growth of “marketable instruments” although in these times this could also be for reasons which are not good.We can apply a similar line of thinking to this perhaps.

From the perspective of the holding sectors of deposits in M3, the annual growth rate of deposits placed by households increased to 7.8% in September from 7.5% in August.

In theory the ECB would welcome this but it is more of a residual item than a cause. What I mean bu that is that is that furlough type payments have been combined with an inability to spend in many areas leading to a rise in savings. We have seen that pretty much everywhere. So it is hardly a surprise to see bank deposits rising.as they are part of this.

Credit

This is is a lagging rather than leading indicator but there was a possible wind of change here.

the annual growth rate of credit to the private sector stood at 4.9% in September, compared with 5.0% in August.

Comment

If we look at what we would normally expect then the rise in narrow money growth should be impacting the economy towards the end of this year and into 2021. The problem is that the economic push is colliding with more Corona Virus restrictions. Just looking at the money supply suggests a bright economic run but in reality official forecasts are going to need their red pen.

If we look into the detail we see that much of the push is also related to government action.

The annual growth rate of credit to general government increased to 18.8% in September from 16.5% in August,

That is from the M3 series and we get another perspective into things we have already noted. Governments are spending heavily leading to deposits rising in one area and the ECB via QE financing much of it to prevent any drain on the money supply from the borrowing. We had got used to some of that but the difference now is the scale as we mull how much of an impact the ch-ch-changes have on the economic consequences of a money supply boost.You may like to look up Goodhart’s Law at this point.

Moving on there is another cloud in the sky because the traditional response of banks to a downturn seems to be in play.

Banks tightened their criteria for approving loans to enterprises and consumers as well as the terms and conditions on the credit they did approve, the survey showed. They expected further tightening in the fourth quarter. ( Reuters)

So for the ECB it is time to consider the advice provided by Bananarama.

It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it
It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it
It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it
And that’s what gets results.

 

 

The Bank of England has become an agent of fiscal policy

It is time to take a look at the strategy of the Bank of England as there were 2 speeches by policymakers yesterday and 2 more are due today including one from the Governor. But before we get to them let us first note where we are. Bank Rate is at 0.1% which is still considered by the Bank of England to be its lower bound, however it did say that about 0.5% and look what happened next! We are at what might now be called cruising speed for QE bond purchases of just over £4.4 billion per week. Previously this would have been considered fast but compared to the initial surge in late March it is not. The Corporate Bond programme has now reached £20 billion and may now be over as the Bank has been vague about the target here. That is probably for best as whilst the Danish shipping company Maersk and Apple were no doubt grateful for the purchases there were issues especially with the latter. It is hard not to laugh at the latter where the richest company in the world apparently needed cheaper funding. Also we have around £117 billion deployed as a subsidy for banks via the Term Funding Scheme and some £16 billion of Commercial Paper has been bought under the Covid Corporate Financing Facility of CCFF.

The Pound’s Exchange Rate

It has been a volatile 2020 for the UK Pound £ as the Brexit merry-go-round has been added to by the Covid-19 pandemic. The initial impact was for the currency to take a dive although fortunately one of the more reliable reverse indicators kicked in as the Financial Times suggested the only was was down at US $1.15. Yesterday saw a rather different pattern as we rallied above US $1.31. However as we widen our perspective we have been in a phase where both the Euro and the Yen have been firm,

If we switch to the trade-weighted or effective index we see that the Pound fell close to 73 in late March but has now rallied to 78. Under the old Bank of England rule of thumb that is equivalent to a 1.25% increase in Bank Rate. Right now the impact is not as strong due to trade issues but even if we say 1% that is a big move relative to interest-rates these days.

Ramsden

Deputy Governor Ransden opened the batting in his speech yesterday by claiming  that lower interest-rates were nothing at all to do with the cuts he and his colleagues have voted for at all.

Over time, these developments reduced the trend interest-rate, big R*, required to bring stocks of capital and wealth into line. And policy rates, including in the UK, followed the trend downwards.

So we no longer have to pay him a large salary and fund an index-linked pension as doe example AI could do the job quite easily? Also it is hard not to note that we would not be told this if the interest-rate cuts had worked.

As a former official at HM Treasury one might expect him to be a fan of QE as it makes the Treasury’s job far easier so this is little surprise.

QE has been an effective tool for stimulating demand through the 11 years of its use in the UK .

Really? If it has been so effective why has it been required for 11 years then? He moves onto a suggestion that there is plenty of “headroom” for more of it. This is followed by an extraordinary enthusiasm for central planning.

But again my starting point is that we have plenty of scope to affect prices. While yields on longer-dated Gilts are at historically low levels, that does not mean they could not still go lower.

There is a problem with his planning though because the QE he is such an enthusiast for has given the UK negative interest-rates via bond yields. At the time of writing maturities out to 6 years or so have negative yields of around -0.06%, Yet he is not a fan of negative interest-rates.

While there might be an appropriate time to use negative interest-rates, that time is not right now, when the economy and the financial system are grappling with the effects of an unprecedented crisis, as well as the myriad uncertainties this crisis has created.

Ah okay, so he is worried about The Precious! The Precious! Curious that because we are told they are so strong.

the banking sector as a whole starts from a position of strength.

Perhaps somebody should show Deputy Governor Dave a chart of the banks share prices. That would soon end any talk of strength. Also if you are Deputy Governor for Markets and Banking it would help if you had some idea about markets.

As a generic I would just like to point out that those who claim the Bank of England is independent need to explain how it has come to be that all the Deputy-Governors have come from HM Treasury?

The Chief Economist

The loose cannon on the decks has been on the wires this morning as he has been speaking at a virtual event. From ForexLive

  • Nothing new to say on negative rates
  • BOE is doing work on negative rates, not the same as being ready to use it
  • Monetary policy can provide more of a cushion to the crisis
  • But more of the heavy lifting has to be done by fiscal policy

Actually he then went on what is a rather odd excursion even for him.

There Is An Open Question Whether Voluntary Or Involuntary Social Distancing Is Holding Back Spending ( @LiveSquawk)

For newer readers he seems to be on something of a journey as previously one would expect him to be an advocate of negative interest-rates whereas now he is against them.

Comment

There is a sub-plot to all of this and let me ask the question is this all now about fiscal policy? The issues over monetary policy are now relatively minor as any future interest-rate cuts will be small in scale to what we have seen and QE bond buying is on the go already. The counterpoint to this is that the Bank of England has seen something of a reverse takeover by HM Treasury as its alumni fill the Deputy Governor roles. Its role is of course fiscal policy.

The speech by Deputy Governor Ramsden can be translated as we will keep fiscal policy cheap for you as he exhibits his enthusiasm for making the job of his former colleagues easier. That allows the Chancellor to make announcements like this.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak is to unveil new support for workers and firms hit by restrictions imposed as coronavirus cases rise across the UK.
He is due to update the Job Support Scheme, which replaces furlough in November, in the Commons on Thursday. ( BBC )

So we have been on quite a journey where we were assured that monetary policy would work but instead had a troubled decade. Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic episode is a type of Black Swan event there is the issue that something would be along sooner or later that we would be vulnerable to. Now central banks are basically faciliatators for fiscal policy. This brings me to my next point, why are we not asking why we always need more stimuli? Surely that means there is an unaddressed problem.