Why are central bankers so afraid of the truth?

We find ourselves in an era where central bankers wield enormous power. There is something of an irony in this. They were given the ability to set monetary policy as a way of taking power out of the hands of politicians.This led to talk of “independence” as they set interest-rates to achieve an inflation target usually but not always of 2% per annum. Actually this is the first falsehood because we are regularly told this.

The ECB has defined price stability as a year-on-year increase in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) for the euro area of below 2%

They could also tell me the moon is full of cheese but I would not believe that either. I am amazed how rarely this is challenged but price stability is clearly an inflation rate of 0%, The usual argument that this stops relative price shifts collapsed when the oil price fall of 2015/16 gave us inflation of around 0% as plainly there was a relative price shift for oil and indeed other goods. Perhaps the shrieks of “Deflation” were a type of distraction.

Next has come the way that claimed independence has morphed into collusion with the political establishment. This moves us away from the original rationale which was to take monetary policy power out of the hands of politicians to stop them manipulating it for the electoral cycle. What had apparent success which was technocratic control of interest-rates has morphed into this.

  1. Interest-Rates around 0%
  2. Large-Scale purchases of sovereign bonds
  3. Large-Scale purchases of private-sector bonds
  4. Credit Easing
  5. Purchases of equities ( for monetary policy and as a consequence of exchange-rate policy)
  6. Purchases of commercial property so far via Exchange-Traded Funds or ETFs

Not all central banks have gone all the way down the list with the Bank of Japan being the leader of the pack and who knows may go even further overnight at its unscheduled meeting? I should add as people regularly look at my back catalogue that by the time anyone in that category reads this we may see many central banks at step 6 and maybe going further. But back to my collusion point here is some evidence.

I also confirm that the Asset Purchase Facility will remain in place for the financial year 2020-21.

This is almost a throwaway sentence in the inflation remit from the Bank of England but it is in fact extremely important in two ways, and in tune with today’s theme neither of which are mentioned. The Chancellor Rishi Sunak is reaffirming that Her Majesty’s Treasury is backing the QE ( Quantitative Easing ) policies of the Bank of England which currently are steps 2 to 4 above. Next comes the issue of the amount which is huge even for these times.

The Committee voted by a majority of 7-2 for the Bank of England to continue with the programme of £200 billion of UK government bond and sterling non-financial investment-grade corporate bond purchases, financed by the issuance of central bank reserves, to take the total stock of these purchases to £645 billion.

The 2 dissenters voted for “More! More! More!” rather than less and I expect the extra £100 billion they voted for to be something sung about by The Undertones.

Happens all the time
Its going to happen – happen – till your change your mind
Its going to happen – happen – happens all the time

So we have a doom loop for supporters of independence as the politicians via backing any losses from QE become the masters again and the central bankers become marionettes. As so often we see Japan in the van by the way the Abenomics of Shinzo Abe appointed Governor Kuroda to the Bank of Japan pretty much as they would appoint a minister. It is the most exposed in terms of monetary policy via its 31.4 trillion Yen of equity holdings with a break-even it estimates at around 19,500 in terms of the Nikkei 225 index. Also of course an individual company in which it holds shares could fold.

Forward Guidance

This had a cacophony of falsehoods as we were promised interest-rate rises which failed to happen. In my own country it became laughable as an unemployment rate of 7% was highlighted and then unemployment rates of 6% and 5% were ignored. Then at Mansion House in June 2014 Governor Mark Carney said this.

There’s already great speculation about the exact timing of the first rate hike and this decision is becoming
more balanced.
It could happen sooner than markets currently expect.

In fact a bit over 2 years later he cut them whilst promising to reduce them further than November to 0.1% before economic reality even reached Threadneedle Street and the latter was redacted. It is hard to believe now but many were predicting interest-rate rises by the ECB in 2019 based on Forward Guidance. Of course the US Federal Reserve did actually give it a go before retreating like Napoleon from Moscow and as we recall the role of President Trump in this I would remind you of my political collusion/control point above.

Negative Interest-Rates

This area is littered with falsehoods. In Beatles terms it took only a week for this.

Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said he is not thinking of adopting a negative interest rate policy now,

to become this.

The Bank will apply a negative interest rate of minus 0.1 percent to current accounts that financial institutions hold at the Bank.1 It will cut the interest rate further into negative territory if judged as necessary.

As Hard-Fi put it.

Can’t believe it
You’re so hard to beat
Hard to beat

The new Governor of the Bank of England seems to be on the same road to Damascus. From Sky News yesterday.

Mr Bailey told MPs it was now studying how effective that cut had been as well as “looking very carefully” at the experience of other countries where negative rates had been implemented.

On the prospect of negative rates, he said: “We do not rule things out as a matter of principle.

Curious because that is exactly what people had thought he had done several times in this crisis.

Comment

There are other areas I could highlight as for example there is the ridiculous adherence to the output gap philosophy that has proved to be consistent only in its failures. But let me leave you via the genius of Christine McVie the central bankers anthem.

Tell me lies
Tell me sweet little lies
Tell me lies, tell me, tell me lies
Oh, no, no, you can’t disguise
(You can’t disguise, no, you can’t disguise)
Tell me lies
Tell me sweet little lies

Me on The Investing Channel

 

In the future will all central banks buy equities?

As the weather shows a few signs of picking up in London it appears that one central banker at least has overheated listening to Glen Frey on the radio.

The heat is on, on the street
Inside your head, on every beat
And the beat’s so loud, deep inside
The pressure’s high, just to stay alive
‘Cause the heat is on

Yes it is our favourite “loose cannon on the decks” which is the Bank of England Chief Economist Andy Haldane. He has been quiet in recent times after his Grand Tour around the UK to take central banking to the people and get himself appointed as Governor was widely ignored. But he is back.

LONDON (Reuters) – The Bank of England is looking more urgently at options such as negative interest rates and buying riskier assets to prop up the country’s economy as it slides into a deep coronavirus slump, the BoE’s chief economist was quoted as saying.

The Telegraph newspaper said the economist, Andy Haldane, refused to rule out the possibility of taking interest rates below zero and buying lower-quality financial assets under the central bank’s bond-buying programme.

There is a lot going on there and certainly enough for him to be summoned to the Governor’s study to explain why he contradicted what the Governor had said only a few days before. Also as is his wont Andy had also contradicted himself.

“The economy is weaker than a year ago and we are now at the effective lower bound, so in that sense it’s something we’ll need to look at – are looking at – with somewhat greater immediacy,” he said in an interview. “How could we not be?”

So we have a lower bound for interest-rates but we are thinking of cutting below it? So it is not an effective lower bound then. I can help him out with just a couple of letters as calling it an ineffective lower bound would fix it. Of course Andy has experience of numbers slip-sliding away on his watch as the estimate of equilibrium unemployment has gone from 6.5% to around 4.25% ( it has got a bit vague of late) torpedoing his output gap theories. Even worse of course it will now be going back up. Time for him to move from Glen Frey to Kylie Minogue.

I’m spinning around
Move outta my way

Then there is Andy’s hint about buying equities.

buying lower-quality financial assets

He has a problem with those who recall him pointing out he does not understand pensions so he would not be a stock picker more a tracker man. Although of course in the UK in many ways that means the same thing. For example if we look at Astra Zeneca it was worth just under £108 billion at the beginning of this month and Royal Dutch Shell some £95 billion whereas if we those bandying for the number 100 slot we are between £3 and £3.5 billion. Then the FTSE 100 is over 80% of the all-share so by now I think you will have figured that yet again such a policy would benefit big business. Andy may not have done so as his “Sledgehammer QE” of 2016 dashed into such UK stalwarts as er Apple and Maersk. An error being repeated in the current operations.

Chair Powell

Chair Powell of the US Federal Reserve was interviewed on 60 Minutes yesterday which was likely to be more like 40 minutes when you allow for adverts. What did he say? Well after a really odd section on virology we got this burst of hype.

But I would just say this. In the long run, and even in the medium run, you wouldn’t want to bet against the American economy. This economy will recover. And that means people will go back to work. Unemployment will get back down. We’ll get through this. It may take a while. It may take a period of time. It could stretch through the end of next year. We really don’t know. We hope that it will be shorter than that, but no one really knows.

Eyes will have turned to the hint that it might be in 2022 as that begs a lot of questions as to what the Federal Reserve might do in the meantime. What about this for instance?

I continue to think, and my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee continue to think that negative interest rates is probably not an appropriate or useful policy for us here in the United States. ( Chair Powell)

“probably not” eh? That is leaving the door open to a change of mind. This is in spite of the fact that in central banking terms this is quite a damning critique ( as it involves an implicit criticism of other central banks).

The evidence on whether it helps is quite mixed.

Also as section which is just plain wrong.

PELLEY: So the banks would pay people to borrow money, essentially?

POWELL: Yes.

Let us now move onto what might be called the money shots.

POWELL: Well, there’s a lot more we can do. We’ve done what we can as we go. But I will say that we’re not out of ammunition by a long shot. No, there’s really no limit to what we can do with these lending programs that we have. So there’s a lot more we can do to support the economy, and we’re committed to doing everything we can as long as we need to.

The track record of central bankers using the phrase “no limit” is not good as the Swiss National Bank most famously found out. But there was more and the emphasis below is mine.

POWELL: Well, to begin, the one thing we can certainly do is we can enlarge our existing lending programs. We can start new lending programs if need be. We can do that. There are things we can do in monetary policy. There are a number of dimensions where we can move to make policy even more accommodative. Through forward guidance, we can change our asset purchase strategy. There are just a lot of things that we can do.

Comment

Central bankers are like gamblers on a losing streak desperately doubling down. You do not need to take my word for it as we can take a look at a country which has been enthusiastically buying equities for a while now, which is Japan. For example the Bank of Japan bought over 100 billion Yen’s worth as recently as Friday on its way to this.

The Bank will actively purchase ETFs and J-REITs for the time being so that their amounts outstanding will increase at annual paces with the upper limit of about 12 trillion
yen and about 180 billion yen, respectively.

As of the last update the Bank of Japan had bought some 31.4 trillion Yen of equity ETFs. How is that going?

Japan fell into a technical recession in the first quarter for the first time since 2015

That is from the Financial Times. If you think that does not do justice to an economy 2% smaller than a year ago and seeing nominal GDP declines with a large national debt, well the FT is Japanese owned these days. Meanwhile back in the real world the lost decade(s) carries on.

Why would you copy that? Yet we seem likely to do so…..

Podcast on the UK Gilt Market

 

The central banking parade continues

The last 24 hours have seen a flurry of open mouth operations from the world’s central bankers. There are a couple of reasons for this of which the first is that having burst into action with the speed of Usain Bolt they now have little to do. The second is that they have become like politicians as they bask centre stage in the media spotlight. The third is that their policies require a lot of explaining because they never achieve what they claim so we see long words like “counterfactual” employed to confuse the unwary.

The land of the rising sun

Let us go in a type of reverse order as Governor Kuroda of the Bank of Japan has been speaking this morning and as usual has uttered some gems.

BoJ Gov Kuroda: Repeats BoJ Would Not Hesitate To Add Additional Easing If Needed -BoJ Has Several Tools And Measures To Deploy If Required ( @LiveSquawk )

This is something of a hardy perennial from him the catch though comes with the “if required” bit. You see the April Economic Report from the Ministry of Finance told us this.

The Japanese economy is getting worse rapidly in an extremely severe situation, due to the Novel Coronavirus…….Concerning short-term prospects, an extremely severe situation is expected to remain due to the influence of the infectious disease. Moreover, full attention should be given to the further downside risks to the domestic and foreign economy which are affected by the influence of the infectious disease.

So if not now when? After all the Japanese economy was already in trouble at the end if 2019 as it shrank by 1.8% in the final quarter. Actually he did kind of admit that.

BoJ’s Kuroda: Japan’s Economy To Be Substantially Depressed In Q2

Then looking at his speech another warning Klaxon was triggered.

In the meantime, it expects short- and long-term policy interest rates to remain at their present
or lower levels.

This raises a wry smile because in many ways the Bank of Japan is the central bank that likes negative interest-rates the least. Yes it has one of -0.1% but it tiptoed into it with the minimum it felt it could and stopped, unlike in other easing areas where it has been happy to be the leader of the pack. Why? Well after nearly 30 years of the lost decade it still worries about the banking sector and whether it could survive them and gives them subsidies back as it is. Frankly it has been an utter disaster and shows one of the weaknesses of the Japanese face culture.

Oh and as we mull the couple of decades of easing we got this as well.

KURODA: RECENT EASING ACTION INCLUDING MORE ETF PURCHASES IS TEMPORARY ( @DeltaOne)

This morning there was just over another 100 billion Yen of equity ETF purchases as we mull another refinement of the definition of temporary in my financial lexicon for these times. It appears to mean something which keeps being increased and never ends.

The Bank of England

The new Governor Andrew Bailey gave an interview to Robert Peston of ITV last night which begged a few questions. The first was how its diversity plans seem to involve so much dealing with the children of peers of the realm and Barons in particular? This of course went disastrously wrong with Deputy Governor Charlotte Hogg who seemed to know as little about monetary policy as she did about the conflict of interest issue which led to her departure. During the interview Robert Peston seemed to be exhibiting a similar degree of competence as I pointed out on social media.

@Peston  now says that buying hundreds of billions of debt is different to a decade ago when the Bank of England bought er hundreds of billions of debt. It is frightening that this man was once BBC economics editor.

There was a policy element although it was not news to us I am sure it was to some.

Governor of the Bank of England Andrew Bailey has told ITV’s Peston show that one of the main purposes of the Bank buying £200bn of government debt – and probably more over the course of the Covid-19 crisis – is to “spread the cost of this thing to society” and help the government avoid a return to austerity. ( ITV)

To the extent that there was a policy announcement the whole interview was very wrong as it should be on the Bank of England website for all to see rather than boosting the career of one journalist and network. As I note how that person’s career had been under pressure we see the UK establishment in action. I also note that two subjects were not mentioned.

  1. The apparent dirty protest at the FCA on Andrew Bailey’s watch
  2. The doubling of overdraft interest-rates after a botched intervention by the FCA on Andrew Bailey’s watch.

The United States

Something rather ominous happened last night as The Hill reports.

“He has done a very good job over the last couple of months, I have to tell you that,” Trump told reporters during a meeting with the governors of Colorado and North Dakota. “Because I have been critical, but in many ways I call him my ‘MIP.’ Do you know what an MIP is? Most improved player. It’s called the Most Improved Player award.”

We noted back in November 2018 that The Donald was taking charge of US monetary policy and that Jerome Powell had become something of a toy. Indeed there was more.

The president said he still is at odds with Powell over his stance on negative interest rates. Trump has for months pushed negative interest rates, arguing the U.S. is on an unfair playing field if other countries have negative rates.

Whilst I disagree with The Donald on negative interest-rates he is at least honest and we know where he stands. Whereas Chair Powell said this.

Speaking to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Powell said negative interest rates are “not something that we’re looking at,” ( Forbes)

Is that an official denial? Anyway it does not go that well with this.

The economic toll has taken an outsized toll on lower-income households, Powell said, with 40% of those employed in February and living in a household that makes less than $40,000 a year losing their job in March.

Conceptually this is a real issue for the US Federal Reserve as such people are unlikely to have many holdings ( or indeed any…) of the assets it keeps pumping up the price of.

Comment

As we survey the scene some of it is surreal. I noted on Tuesday that the US had already seen two examples of negative interest-rates and one has deepened in the meantime. US Feds Funds futures have moved as high as 100.025 for the summer of 2021 and 100.05 for the autumn. Now -0.05% is not a lot but these things have a habit of being like a balloon that is about to be inflated.

You may also note that those who have claimed central banks are independent of government have been silent recently.Perhaps they are busy redacting past comments?

Missing for today’s update so far has been the European Central Bank or ECB. This is because it is involved in something of an internal turf war.

The shock at the ruling is palpable in the corridors of power in Berlin as Karlsruhe’s three-month deadline runs down.

Officials are trying to work out a way of satisfying the court without eroding the independence of the ECB, which has kept the euro zone intact through a decade of crises.

One lawmaker described feeling like a bomb disposal expert, “because the Constitutional Court has put an explosive charge under the euro and the EU”. ( Reuters)

Hang on! Someone still thinks central banks are independent…….

The US Repo cavalry arrives with the “Lagarde bond yield bounce”

This has been an extraordinary week, so much so that I am going to relegate the shambles that was the ECB action yesterday as President Lagarde lived down to all my criticisms of her to second place. This is because at around 5pm London time yesterday the US Cavalry arrived so let me hand you over to the New York Federal Reserve,

As a part of its $60 billion reserve management purchases for the monthly period beginning March 13, 2020 and continuing through April 13, 2020, the Desk will conduct purchases across a range of maturities to roughly match the maturity composition of Treasury securities outstanding.  Specifically, the Desk plans to distribute reserve management purchases across eleven sectors, including nominal coupons, bills, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, and Floating Rate Notes

So most of the “not QE” is now outright QE ar least for now and we know what tends to happen to such temporary moves. After all weren’t the daily Repos supposed to be temporary when they started last September?

Also in another very familiar theme we see that any attempt at a “taper” seems to morph into an expansion.

Today, March 12, 2020, the Desk will offer $500 billion in a three-month repo operation at 1:30 pm ET that will settle on March 13, 2020.  Tomorrow, the Desk will further offer $500 billion in a three-month repo operation and $500 billion in a one-month repo operation for same day settlement.  Three-month and one-month repo operations for $500 billion will be offered on a weekly basis for the remainder of the monthly schedule.

There is a lot of numbers bingo there and many on social media either fell for it or chose to fall for it by declaring an extra US $1.5 trillion of QE. But let us take the advice of Kylie Minogue.

I’m breaking it down
I’m not the same

We had to wait less than an hour to discover that the first Repo was for US $78.4 billion. So we saw that the Fed has in fact finally taken my advice and made sure it was offering too much to find out as much as possible what the true state of play is. Rather late in the day though as it is doing it in an equity market inspired panic as opposed ti thinking ahead. As to QE we have something of a US $78.4 as an 84 day Repo qualifies for me in spite of officially being “not QE” plus we have an Operation Twist style extension of average maturity on the existing US $60 billion a month.

I do not know what today’s Repo allocations will be only that bids will be filled in full up to the US $500 billion maximum. Should they be like last night’s then we will see a US $225 billion increase in QE which is quite some distance from many claims. Of course more or less might be taken.

What is really happening here?

There is an elephant in the room and it was sung about by Aloe Blacc

I need a dollar dollar, a dollar is what I need
Hey hey
Well I need a dollar dollar, a dollar is what I need
Hey hey
And I said I need dollar dollar, a dollar is what I need
And if I share with you my story would you share your dollar with me

Indeed he was especially prescient here.

Bad times are comin’ and I reap what I don’t sow
Hey hey
Well let me tell you somethin’ all that glitters ain’t gold
Hey hey

Actually at US $1583 gold is not glittering much either with rumours abounding that it is being sold to help settle margin payments elsewhere. In a crisis people want the security of King Dollar or the world’s reserve currency. This adds to the existing dollar shortage which I wrote about on the 25th of September 2018, and to the issue last September when a Euro area bank had to go to the US Federal Reserve for dollars.

This brings us to the banks who are the drivers of this. The suspicion is that at a minimum some cannot get dollars in the usual way via markets and thus have to go to the US Federal Reserve. With markets being as they have ( oil, bonds and equities) frankly I would not be surprised if some banks are in trouble. On that note I see one at least has made an official denial of such problems already today.

FRANKFURT (Reuters) – Deutsche Bank’s <DBKGn.DE> top executives sought to assure employees and investors over its ability to weather the coronavirus as shares in the German lender hit a new low on Thursday amid a wider stock market sell-off.

Christian Sewing, chief executive of Germany’s largest bank, told employees in a memo seen by Reuters that Deutsche Bank’s business was in “good shape as the positive momentum of the fourth quarter has continued”.

A Communications Break Down at the ECB

There was some surprise at the lack of much action from the ECB yesterday highlighted by the fact that even more bank subsidies were accompanied by further falls in bank share prices. But it got worse and then much worse. The worse bit was when the ECB press officer had to correct President Lagarde about the size of the extra QE announced as it was 120 billion Euros and not 100 billion. So the claim that Christine Lagarde was good at reading off a teleprompter crashed and burned, But then things got even worse.

Well, we will be there, as I said earlier on, using full flexibility, but we are not here to close spreads[1]. This is not the function or the mission of the ECB.

Curious because you could summarise the term of her “Whatever it takes” predecessor as doing exactly that. Rather than me describe the issue let me hand you over to the correction issued by the ECB.

[Statement in CNBC interview after press conference:] I am fully committed to avoid any fragmentation in a difficult moment for the euro area. High spreads due to the coronavirus impair the transmission of monetary policy. We will use the flexibility embedded in the asset purchase programme, including within the public sector purchase programme.

By down she meant up etc….

This was issued because the statement detonated across Euro area bond markets with the Italian ten-year yield going from 1.3% to 1.8%. Actually as a result of what no doubt will be called “The Lagarde Bounce” the ten-year yield is now 1.88%. So just as the corona virus ravaged Italy needs a helping hand Christine Lagarde has kicked it in the teeth. In fact just like she did to Greece and Argentina. You might think there was a theme there and that such a theme would have stopped her appointment. But no and of course so much of the media joined in by lauding it. Sadly we have a sort of Marie Antoinette theme in play.

Meanwhile two bank subsidies were announced. Firstly the new liquidity measures announced that via the TLTRO banks will be able to get cash at interest-rates as low as -0.75% compared to the -0.5% of everyone else. As Gollum would say.

We wants it, we needs it. Must have the precious.

Also there was something tucked away in the rules so let me hand you over to JohannesBorgen on twitter

As pointed out by @borisg_work I forgot to remove our Brexited friends, so RWA are more likely around 14tn now (anyone has an accurate recent # i’m interested) which suggest between 500bn and 600bn – still very big!

Changes in the Risk Weighted Assets rules meant a boost of around 500 billion Euros of capital relief. He got a boost as the ECB press officer retweeted him so perhaps he explained their own policy to them.

Comment

As you can see this is a bit of a shambles. If you argue that this could be like 2008 then the central planners at least managed a concerted fusillade. This time around they are taking individual pop shots and in at least one case have shot themselves in the foot. Actually at the ECB things are going from bad to worse.

@bancaditalia  governor #Visco @ecb  will do more if needed and can front load purchases if needed. Thursday decision was “not the final word” and ECB policy is aimed to ensure adequate liquidity. in exclusive interview with @BloombergTV

Let me deal with it in terms of bullet points.

  1. Presumably the Governor of the Bank of Italy is furious
  2. What is the point of declaring a number and then saying not only it might be larger but also the timing could be faster only 24 hours later?
  3. Actually they declared the next meeting would not be until April Fools Day less then 24 hours ago.
  4. QE reduces bond market liquidity.

Looking at markets then equity markets are surging as I type this because the stimulus fairy has been deployed. Is that the same stimulus fairy that was supposed to appear in the Euro area yesterday or a different one please? But that is my point because as the swings get wider I am more concerned about a fund or funds blowing up. This week alone we have seen wild swings in the bond,oil,equity and gold markets so in fact I am surprised it has not happened and wonder if we are being told the whole truth?

Welcome to the oil price shock of 2020

Today is one where we are mulling how something which in isolation is good news has led to so much financial market distress overnight and this morning. So much so that for once comparisons with 2008 and the credit crunch have some credibility.

And I felt a rush like a rolling bolt of thunder
Spinning my head around and taking my body under
Oh, what a night ( The Four Seasons)

Just as people were getting ready for markets to be impacted by the lock down of Lombardy and other regions in Italy there was a Mexican stand-off in the oil market. This came on top of what seemed at the time large falls on Friday where depending on which oil benchmark you looked at the fall was either 9% or 10%.Then there was this.

DUBAI, March 8 (Reuters) – Saudi Arabia, the world’s top oil exporter, plans to raise its crude oil production significantly above 10 million barrels per day (bpd) in April, after the collapse of the OPEC supply cut agreement with Russia, two sources told Reuters on Sunday.

State oil giant Aramco will boost its crude output after the current OPEC+ cut deal expires at the end of March, the sources said.

Whilst they are playing a game of who blinks first the oil price has collapsed. From Platts Oil

New York — Crude futures tumbled roughly 30% on the open Sunday evening, following news that Saudi Aramco cut its Official Selling Prices for April delivery. ICE front-month Brent fell $14.25 on the open to $31.02/b, before climbing back to trade around $35.22/b at 2238 GMT. NYMEX front-month crude futures fell $11.28 to $30/b on the open, before rising to trade at around $32.00/b.

The Real Economy

Let us get straight to the positive impact of this because in the madness so many are missing it.

We find that a 10 percent increase in global oil inflation increases, on average, domestic inflation by about 0.4
percentage point on impact, with the effect vanishing after two years and being similar between advanced and developing economies. We also find that the effect is asymmetric, with positive oil price shocks having a larger effect than negative ones. ( IMF 2017 Working Paper )

There is plenty of food for thought in the reduced relative impact of lower oil prices for those who believe they are passed on with less enthusiasm and sometimes not passed on at all. But if the IMF are right we will see a reduction in inflation of around 0.6% should oil prices remain here.

As to the impact on economic growth the literature has got rather confused as this from the Bank of Spain in 2016 shows.

Although our findings point to a negative influence from oil price increases on economic growth, this phenomenon is far from being stable and has gone through different phases over time. Further research is necessary to fathom this complex relationship.

Let me give you an example of how it will work which is via higher real wages. Of course central bankers do not want to tell us that because they are trying to raise inflation and are hoping people will not spot that lower real wages will likely be a consequence. To be fair to the IMF it does manage to give us a good laugh.

The impact of oil price shocks, however,
has declined over time due in large part to a better conduct of monetary policy.

That does give us the next link in the story but before we get there let me give you two major problems right now which have links. The first is that the oil price Mexican stand-off has a silent player which is the US shale oil industry. As I have pointed out before it runs on a cash flow business model which has just seen likely future flows of cash drop by a third.

Now we get to the second impact which is on credit markets. Here is WordOil on this and remember this is from Thursday.

NEW YORK (Bloomberg) –Troubled oil and gas companies may have a hard time persuading their bankers to keep extending credit as the outlook darkens for energy, potentially leading to more bankruptcies in the already-beleaguered sector.

Lenders evaluate the value of oil reserves used as collateral for bank loans twice a year, a process that’s not likely to go well amid weak commodity prices, falling demand, shuttered capital markets and fears of coronavirus dampening global growth. Banks may cut their lending to cash-starved energy companies by 10% to 20% this spring, according to investors and analysts.

That will all have got a lot worse on Friday and accelerated today. I think you can all see the problem for the shale oil producers but the issue is now so large it will pose a risk to some of those who have lent them the money.

US oil/junk bonds: busts to show folly of last reboot ( FT Energy )

I am not sure where the FT is going with this bit though.

There will be no shortage of capital standing ready to recapitalise the energy sector….

Perhaps they have a pair of glasses like the ones worn by Zaphod Beeblebrox in The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy. Meanwhile back in the real world there was this before the latest falls.

More than one-third of high-yield energy debt is trading at distressed levels. Oil and gas producers with bonds trading with double-digit yields include California Resources Corp., Range Resources Corp., Southwestern Energy Co., Antero Resources Corp., Comstock Resources Inc., Extraction Oil & Gas Inc. and Oasis Petroleum Inc. ( World Oil)

Central Banks

As the oil price news arrived central bankers will have been getting text messages to come into work early. Let me explain why. Firstly we know that some credit markets were already stressed and that the US Federal Reserve had been fiddling while Rome burns as people sang along with Aloe Blacc.

I need a dollar, dollar a dollar is what I need
hey hey
Well I need a dollar, dollar a dollar is what I need
hey hey
And I said I need dollar dollar, a dollar is what I need.

Whoever decided to taper the fortnightly Repo operations to US $20 billion had enough issues when US $70 billion was requested on Thursday, now I guess he or she is not answering the phone. Anyway the role of a central bank in a crisis like this is to be lender of last resort and splash the cash. At the same time it should be doing emergency investigations to discover the true state of affairs in terms of solvency.

This is because some funds and maybe even banks must have been hit hard by this and may go under. Anyone long oil has obvious problems and if that is combined with oil lending it must look dreadful. If anyone has geared positions we could be facing another Long-Term Capital Management. Meanwhile in unrelated news has anyone mentioned the derivatives book of Deutsche Bank lately?

The spectre of more interest-rate cuts hangs over us like a sword of damocles. I type that because I think they will make things worse rather than better and central banks would be better employed with the liquidity issues above. They are much less glamorous but are certainly more effective in this type of crisis. Frankly I think further interest-rate cuts will only make things worse.

Comment

I have covered a lot of ground today but let me move onto home turf. We can also look at things via bond yields and it feels like ages ago that I marked your cards when it was only last Thursday! Anyway we have been on this case for years.

Treasury 10-Year Note Yield Slides Below 0.5% for First Time ( @DiMartinoBooth)

Yes it was only early last week that we noted a record low as it went below 1%. Meanwhile that was last night and this is now.

Overnight the US 10-year traded 0.33%, under 0.44% now. The longbond traded down to 0.70% overnight. The bond futures were up over 12 points. Now trading 0.85%. Note how “gappy” this chart is. Liquidity is an issue. ( @biancoresearch )

This really matters and not in the way you may be thinking. The obvious move is that if you are long bonds you have again done really well and congratulations. Also there is basically no yield these days as for example, my home country the UK has seen a negative Gilt yield this morning around the two-year maturity.

But the real hammer on the nail will not be in price ( interest-rates) it will be in quantity as some places will be unable to lend today. Some of it will be predictable ( oil) but in these situations there is usually something as well from left field. So let me end this part Hill Street Blues style.

Let’s be careful out there

Podcast

I have not mentioned stock markets today but I was on the case of bank shares in my weekly podcast. Because at these yields and interest-rates they lack a business model.

 

 

 

What will happen to house prices now?

I thought that I would end this week with a topic that we can look at from many angles. For example the first question asked by the bodies that have dominated this week, central banks, is what will this do to house prices? Well in ordinary times this weeks actions would have quite an impact and I am including in this expectations of future action by the Bank of England and European Central Bank (ECB). For newer readers this is because bond yields and their consequent impact on mortgage rates move these days ahead of policy action and sometimes well ahead. Of course, maybe one day central banks will fail to ease but such beliefs rely on ignoring the history of the credit crunch so far where such events were described rather aptly by Muse with supermassive black hole and monetary tightening was described by Oasis with Definitely Maybe,or perhaps better still by Rod Stewart with I Was Only Joking.

Bond Yields

The world has moved on even since I looked at this yesterday. Perhaps even faster than I suggested it might! Well played to any reader either long bonds or long a bond fund as you have had an excellent 2020. Sadly those on the other side of the balance sheet looking for an annuity are in the reverse situation. Not many places will put it like this but the US Federal Reserve has completely lost control of events this week and has learnt nothing from the mistakes of the Bank of Japan and ECB.

What I mean by this is that the US ten-year yield is now 0.78%. It was only this week that they went below 1% for the first time ever and last week we were looking at it hitting new lows like 1.3%. It started the year at 1.9%. This has been added to by the US Long Bond which has soared overnight reducing the thirty-year yield to 1.36% or 0.21% lower. What this means is that the already much lower US mortgage rates are going much lower still and I would quote some but I am afraid they simply cannot keep up with the bond market surge. Although I do note that Mortgage Daily News is wondering if things will be juiced even more?!

One of them suggested mortgage rates have more room to move lower if the Fed decides to start reinvesting its first $20bln a month of MBS proceeds again (which it currently allows to “roll off” the balance sheet). ( MBS = Mortgage Backed Securities )

As I am typing this events are getting even more extraordinary so let me hand you over to Bloomberg.

U.S. 10-year Treasury yield drops below 0.7%

I have experienced these sort of moves with bond markets falling but cannot recall them ever rallying like this so it is a once in a lifetime move.

You may ask yourself
What is that beautiful house?
You may ask yourself
Where does that highway go to?
And you may ask yourself
Am I right? Am I wrong?
And you may say yourself
“My God! What have I done?” ( Talking Heads )

So I now expect another sharp move lower in US mortgage rates and I expect this to be followed by much of the world. For example in my home country the UK mortgages are mostly fixed-rate these days ( in fact over 90%) so the five-year Gilt yield gives us a marker on what is likely to happen next. It has fallen to 0.14% this morning and so UK mortgages will be seeing more of this from Mortgage Strategy.

Vida Homeloans has announced a series of rate cuts to its residential and buy-to-let mortgage ranges……

Still in the residential range, Vida’s 75 per cent LTV five-year fix has gone down from 5.39 per cent to 4.99 per cent, and its 65 per cent LTV five-year fix from 5.49 per cent to 5.04 per cent.

In the BTL range, the 75 per cent LTV five-year fix has been cut from 4.64 per cent to 4.04 per cent.

I have picked them out because they are specialist lenders for non standard credit. You know the sort of thing we were promised would never happen again. Also we read about turning Japanese but we seem to be turning Italian as payment holidays appear.

Lenders are “ready and able” to offer help to borrowers affected by the Coronavirus outbreak, UK Finance has pledged.

The trade body says this may come in the form of repayment relief to customers whose earnings have been hit or costs increased as a result of contracting the virus or  because of the measures imposed to stop it spreading.

It comes after a number of lenders including TSB, Natwest and Saffron Building Society offered payment holidays to borrowers who had been severely affected by recent flooding.

So we can see that this particular tap is as wide open as it has ever been and as we look around the world we can expect similar moves in many places. In terms of exceptions there is one maybe because Germany is returning to previous bond yield lows ( -0.74% for the benchmark ten-year) and via its policy of yield curve control the Bank of Japan is stopping much of this happening. The latter is another in quite a long list of events from the lost decade era in Japan and I am pointing it out for three reasons.The first is that it is raising rather than reducing bond yields as intended. The second is that therefore we will not see a housing market boost. The third is that I am alone in pointing such things out as the “think tanks” continue to laud yield curve control. After all copying Japan has worked so well hasn’t it?

Mortgage Lending

We can also expect a boost from here. There are plenty of rumours of credit easing especially from the ECB as frankly it has few other options. I would expect much trumpeting of this going to smaller businesses but by some unexplained and unexpected event ( except by some financial terrorist writers) it will go straight into the mortgage market. My home country had an example of this with the Funding for Lending Scheme where the counterfactual needed to be applied to business lending bit was not required for mortgage lending. Japan also had a scheme for smaller businesses where large companies immediately set up subsidiaries and claimed.

Comment

So far I have given these for those expecting a house price rally.

Reasons to be cheerful, part three
1, 2, 3 ( Ian Dury)

For newer readers this is not something I welcome as it is inflation for first-time buyers.

Now let me look at the other side of the coin and there are two main factors. The first is what John Maynard Keynes called “animal spirits” or the film Return to the Forbidden Planet called “monsters of the id”. With worries about jobs and quarantine will people be willing to buy? That may lead to a lagged effect as people refinance now and buy at a later date.

The next is mortgage supply. Whilst the official taps are opening and they are building new pipes as I type there will be some banks and financial institutions that will be under pressure here and thus will not be able to lend. Some we can figure out but other are unpredictable and let me give you a symbol of a big stress factor right now, Yesterday’s 14 day Repo saw around US $70 billion of demand and only US $20 billion was supplied. So dollars are in short supply somewhere and frankly the US Federal Reserve policy of reducing Repo sizes looks pretty stupid.

 

 

 

Was that the bond market tantrum of 2019?

Sometimes economics and financial markets provoke a wry smile. This morning has already provided an example of that as Germany’s statistics office tells us Germany exported 4.6% more in September than a year ago, so booming. Yes the same statistics office that told us yesterday that production was down by 4.3% in September so busting if there is such a word. The last couple of months have given us another example of this do let me start by looking at one side of what has taken place.

QE expansion

We have seen two of the world’s major central banks take steps to expand their QE bond buying one explicitly and the other more implicitly. We looked at the European Central Bank or ECB only on Wednesday.

The Governing Council decided to restart net purchases under each constituent programme of the asset purchase programme (APP)……….. at a monthly pace of €20 billion as from 1 November 2019.

More implicitly have been the actions of the US Federal Reserve as it continues to struggle with the Repo crisis.

Based on these considerations, last Friday the FOMC announced that the Fed will be purchasing U.S. Treasury bills at least into the second quarter of next year.7 Specifically, the Desk announced an initial monthly pace of purchases of $60 billion.

That was John Williams of the New York Fed who added this interesting bit.

These permanent purchases

Also there is this.

In concert with these purchases, the FOMC announced that the Desk will continue temporary overnight and term open market operations at least through January of next year.

Maybe a hint that they think dome of this is year end US Dollar demand. But we find that the daily operations continue and at US $80.14 billion as of yesterday they continue on a grand scale. So the Treasury Bill purchases and fortnightly Repo’s have achieved what exactly?

If we move from the official denials that this is QE to looking at the balance sheet we see that it is back above 4 trillions dollars and rising. In fact it was US $4.02 trillion at the end of last month or around US $250 billion higher in this phase.

Bond Markets

You might think and indeed economics 101 would predict that bond markets would be surging and yields falling right now. But we have learnt that things are much more complex than that. Let me illustrate with the US ten-year Treasury Note. You might expect some sort of boost from the expansion of the balance sheet and the purchases of Treasury Bills. But no, the futures contact which nearly made 132 early last month is at 128 and a half now. At one point yesterday the yield looked like it might make 2% as there was quite a rout but some calm returned and it is 1.91% as I type this.

As an aside this is another reminder of the relative impotence of interest-rate cuts these days as if anything a trigger for yields rising was the US interest-rate cut last week. The Ivory Towers will be lost in the clouds yest again.

The situation is even more pronounced in the Euro area where actual purchases have been ongoing for a week now. However in line with our buy the rumour and sell the fact theme we see that the German bond market has fallen a fair bit. In mid-August the benchmark ten-year yield went below -0.7% whereas now it is -0.26%. So Germany is still being paid to borrow at that maturity but considerably less. Indeed at the thirty-year maturity they do have to pay something albeit not very much ( 0.24%).

The UK

There have been a couple of consequences in the UK. The first I spotted in yesterday’s output from the Bank of England.

Mortgage rates and personal loan rates remain near
historical lows, with the rates on some fixed-rate mortgages continuing to fall over the past few months (Table 2.B).
Interest rates on credit cards have increased, although the effective rate paid by the average borrower has remained
stable, in part because of the past lengthening of interest-free periods.

Whilst this is true, if you are going to parade the knowledge of the absent-minded professor Ben Broadbent about foreign exchange options then you should be aware that as Todd Terry put it.

Something’s goin’ on

The five-year Gilt yield has risen from a nadir of 0.22% to 0.52% so the ultra-low period of mortgage rates is on its way out should we stay here.

If we move to the fiscal policy space in the UK then we see that the message that we can borrow cheaply has arrived in the general election campaign.

Although debt stocks are high in many developed countries, debt service ratios are very low. The UK gross debt stock has doubled from 42 per cent of GDP in 1985 to 84 per cent of GDP today, yet debt interest service has halved, from 4 per cent of GDP to below 2 per cent over the same period. It has rarely been lower. A rule using the debt stock would argue for fiscal consolidation, whereas a debt service metric suggests there is ample room for fiscal expansion. Especially as market interest rates are extraordinarily low. (  FT Alphaville)

https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2019/11/06/1573068343000/Is-it-time-for-a-shift-in-fiscal-rules–/

I have avoided the political promises which peak I think with the Greens suggestion of an extra £100 billion a year. But the Toby Nangle and Neville Hill proposal above has strengths and has similarities to what I have suggested here for some time. But I think it needs to come with some way of locking the debt costs in, so if you borrow more because it is cheap you borrow for fifty years and not five. It reinforces my suggestion of the 27th of June that the UK should issue some 100 year Gilts.

Comment

There is a fair bit to consider here and let me start with the borrow whilst it is still cheap theme. There are issues as highlighted by this from Francine Lacqua of Bloomberg.

London’s Elizabeth line has been delayed by a year, and will require extra funding, according to TfL

For those unaware this was called Crossrail ( renaming is often a warning sign) which will be a welcome addition to the London transport infrastructure combing elements of The Tube with the railways. But it gets ever later and more expensive.

There was also some irony as regards the Bank of England as in response to the sole decent question at its presser yesterday (from Joumanna Bercetche of CNBC) Governor Carney effectively suggested the next rate move would be down not up. Yet Gilt yields rose.

Next comes the issue of whether this is a sea-change or just part of the normal ebb and flow of financial markets? We will find out more this afternoon as we wait to see if there were more than just singed fingers in the German bond market for example or whether some were stopped out? After all reporting you had taken negative yield and a capital loss poses more than a few questions about your competence. Even the most credulous will now know it is not a one-way bet but on the other hand if you are expecting QE4 to come down the New York slipway then you can place your bets at much better levels than before.