The UK poverty problem is more than a story about austerity

Timing can sometimes be if not everything very important and so the release of the UN report on UK poverty by Phillip Alston on the day we get the latest data on the public finances is unlikely to be a coincidence. So let us get straight to it.

Although the United Kingdom is the world’s fifth largest economy, one fifth of its population (14 million people) live in poverty, and 1.5 million of them experienced destitution in 2017.

That is certainly eye-catching especially the use of the word destitution. However it was only on Monday that Andrew Baldwin reminded us that using purchasing power parity or PPP the UK is in fact the ninth largest economy rather than the fifth. So we note immediately that many of these concepts are more elusive than you might think. That issue particularly relates to the issue of poverty which is basic terms can be absolute or relative. With the relative definition we find that people can be better off but poverty gets worse. especially if the definitions are changed. I note that the Social Metrics Commission has done exactly that.

This new metric accounts for the negative impact on people’s weekly income of inescapable costs such as childcare and the impact that disability has on people’s needs……. The Commission’s metric also takes the first steps to including groups of people previously
omitted from poverty statistics, like those living on the streets and those in overcrowded housing.

The issue is complex and on a personal level my eyes went to one of the supporters of this which is the same Oliver Wyman which assured us that Anglo Irish Bank was the best bank in the world in 2006.  It was not too long before it was nationalised and made the largest loss in Irish corporate history.

The Detail

Be that as it may the report tells us this.

 Four million of those are more than 50 per cent below the poverty line and 1.5 million experienced destitution in 2017, unable to afford basic essentials. Following drastic changes in government economic policy beginning in 2010, the two preceding decades of progress in tackling child and pensioner poverty have begun to unravel and poverty is again on the rise. Relative child poverty rates are expected to increase by 7 per cent between 2015 and 2021 and overall child poverty rates to reach close to 40 per cent.

On the other hand if we go to the absolute poverty measure then we are told this.

“There are 1 million fewer people in absolute poverty today – a record low; 300,000 fewer children
in absolute poverty – a record low; and 637,000 fewer children living in workless households – a record low.” ( Prime Minister May)

As you can see there is an extraordinary difference between the two approaches.

UK Public Finances

We can look at the situation from this perspective so here we go.

Borrowing (public sector net borrowing excluding public sector banks) in April 2019 was £5.8 billion, £0.03 billion less than in April 2018; the lowest April borrowing since 2007.

So the monthly numbers were better albeit by the thinnest of margins so let us delve more deeply.

Borrowing in the latest full financial year (April 2018 to March 2019) was £23.5 billion, £18.3 billion less than in the previous financial year; the lowest full financial year borrowing for 17 years (April 2001 to March 2002).

As you can see we are now approaching a possible budget balance because the same rate of improvement this year would pretty much wipe the deficit out. This raises a wry smile because when the government was supposedly trying to do this it remained a mirage and was always around three years away on the forecasts. Except three years later it was three years away again! Yet the current government has regularly promised to end austerity and has in fact made quite a lot of progress towards a balance budget. Make of that what you will. In fact the situation has levels of complexity as the spending numbers make clear.

Over the same period, central government spent £740.7 billion, an increase of 2.5%.

Those are the numbers for the full financial year to March and they open the austerity debate again. It depends which inflation measure you use as to whether that is a cut in real terms (RPI) or a rise ( CPI). It also depends on how you define austerity as that too varies. Monthly numbers vary but the latest month suggests a minor reduction in it.

 while total central government expenditure increased by £1.8 billion (or 2.7%) to £66.5 billion.

Moving onto what has changed the deficit numbers ( what used to be called the PSBR) the most has been this development.

In the latest full financial year (April 2018 to March 2019), central government received £739.7 billion in income, including £559.0 billion in taxes. This was 4.9% more than in the previous financial year.

As you can see revenue has been strong and that gives us a hint that maybe the economy has been stronger than the GDP data has picked up and perhaps more in line with the employment and real wages numbers. One way of looking at the situation is to compare revenue with the national debt and if we do so using the international standard ( Maastricht) then it is 40%.

Whilst we are looking at revenue I am often critical of Royal Bank of Scotland so let me also post the other side of it.

On 14 February 2019, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (RBS)announced the dividend price to be paid to shareholders on 30 April 2019. As a shareholder, the government received £0.8 billion

Comment

The report from the UN’s special rapporteur does remind us of problems as well as teaching me that the word rapporteur exists. Those familiar with my work will know that the fact that real wages are still nowhere near the previous peak is an issue. Added to this comes the enormous effort to keep house prices out of the inflation index and then the way that the costs of home ownership are represented by fantasy rents which are never paid. You might reasonably argue that home ownership is the distance of Jupiter away for the poor but the mess made of this area has affected even them as via problems with the balance between new and old rents it seems likely to me that the official rental data has recorded the wrong numbers as in too low.

Whilst the good professor has sadly resorted to a bit of politicking I thing he is on form ground pointing out issues like this.

Children are showing up at school with empty stomachs, and schools are collecting food and sending it
home because teachers know their students will otherwise go hungry…….In England,
homelessness rose 60 per cent between 2011 and 2017 and rough sleeping rose 165 per cent
from 2010 to 2018……. Food bank use increased almost
fourfold between 2012–2013 and 2017–2018,29 and there are now over 2,000 food banks in
the United Kingdom, up from just 29 at the height of the financial crisis.

The rough sleeping issue has increased in the area I live ( Battersea). I also agree that Universal Credit was a good idea that has been implemented incompetently.

Returning to the number-crunching it gets ever more complex to see through the fog as I fear HM Treasury plans to start making smoke.

In the financial year ending March 2019, £8.0 billion in dividends were transferred from the Bank of England Asset Purchase Facility Fund (BEAPFF) to HM Treasury.

Also moving to today’s inflation data which I will pick up on another time I noticed that computer games are hitting the news again, this time with a downwards effect. The official statistics are having real problems with such fashion items and @Radionotme has suggested that the trend to digital sales ( which he thinks are not reported) may also be an issue.

80 per cent of UK video game sales are now digital, new figures have revealed.

The Entertainment Retailers Association said of the £3.86bn generated by the video game market in the UK in 2018, £3.09bn was from digital and £770m was from physical sales. ( Eurogamer)

 

 

18 thoughts on “The UK poverty problem is more than a story about austerity

  1. Hello Shaun,

    the trouble with relative poverty is that you end up with everyone but the Queen as being “poor” …..

    forbin,

    PS: worse would be such fiction indexes such as a ” happy ” index which has been mooted

  2. Hello Shaun,

    so ONS states “Electricity and gas prices were the biggest driver of inflation last month”

    yah we all know , 10% rise by a ham fisted HMG

    I note that social and environmental costs are lumped together – I guess that’s to hide the increasing social cost ( ie people who can’t pay that would other wise have their bill met from the DHSS ) – the total is 17.5% !!!

    Forbin

  3. Poor is being a striking miner in the 80s. No wage, no benefits and a family to feed.
    The key factor is the cost of accommodation. No council houses means that it doesn’t really matter how much you raise benefits as the land lords will just rasie prices even higher.

    I can still remember getting my first job and finding that 90 percent of my take home pay went on rent. I had to walk to work as I couldn’t afford a bus and I lost over a stone in weight as I coudln’t afford to buy enough food to replace the calories.

    The homeless issue is a real problem that needs some radical thinking. It is now incredibly easy to end up with nowhere to live. I’ve met homeless people with jobs. Back in the 80s there was a lot of illegal squatting but that seems to no longer be an option. Is there really nothing we can offer in between a tent under a bridge and 800 pound a month for rent ( often shared ).

    • Agree, the poorest people are those who rent and have a family who work for a wage circa 25k thus putting them above the threshold for many benefits, and have the associated costs of getting to and from work along with feeding oneself, plus childcare.

      People on benefits and supplied with a council house are doing very well compared to most .. though in these times where most people are profiting from one state handout or another be it via house price inflation, grossly generous pensions, non job in the public/state sponsored private sector or £15k or more in child tax credits they will always be asking for more.

    • ” Is there really nothing we can offer in between a tent under a bridge and 800 pound a month for rent ( often shared ).”

      apparently not.

      and no , there’s no need for any radical thinking . Council housing serves a purpose and it’s about time some in this country realize it’s a vital one .

      Forbin

      PS: if you can figure a way of stopping HMG force selling off these assets I’m all ears.

      PPS: some humor is needed I think – would be funnier if it wasn’t becoming the future 😉

  4. “Inescapable costs such as childcare”? I’ve escaped them my whole life; who’s forcing these people to have children, I wonder.

    I know it’s a cheap shot, but one person’s necessity is another’s “couldn’t care less”. How many use Amazon, or Facebook, or Ebay or any one of a hundred online services I don’t touch but which many see as almost human rights?

    Food (calories), water, shelter are requirements. The rest is fluff and reports that equate anyone in the UK who have these with people in real destitution in Sudan or Sierra Leone are not serving a useful purpose IMO.

    • Having children is a rather important part of human survival. Also they’re needed to fund elderly medical care and pensions.

      The reality is for a man on an average wage of £500-600 Per Week, that his better half will have to go to work so they can pay the rent and myriad of bills and taxes.

      Its circa 1 months average take home pay just to pay council tax on a 3 bed house.

      And with families scattered across the country, granny may not be there or have the strength to look after the kids whilst both parents work. It is a reality many don’t see or realise.

      Only way for this to be resolved is for accommodation prices to crash, a 3 bed terrace in Prime Surrey could easily be built and sold at a profit for 70K, this is the best way to end the need for 2 parents to work.

      • I certainly agree about the huge waste of wealth that the average UK house represents to the owner. The problem with a crash, of course, is that it would be made damn sure that it was those owners and not the mortgage lenders that would suffer. Not to mention those poor saps that have paid off their mortgages in hope of using downsizing to supply a living pension.

        “I wouldn’t start from here if I were you.” as they say in Ireland.

  5. Forbin, I fear you are well behind the times, no the DHSS (you mean DWP) does not pay for energy costs of poor people no idea where you got that notion from. I was a keen climber in my youth and the motto was always take the weakest with you. The reason populism is on the rise is that both main parties forgot this, people are just thrown under the nearest bus when they are no longer economically viable. Does anyone on here seriously believe food banks should have a reason to exist? Shame on you if you do.

    We exists in a past century in a lot of ways, the notion that people must be forced into work or that we’re able to judge between deserving and undeserving poor is ludicrous, look at the damage the callous work assessments have caused, look at the rise of in work poverty.

    We have seriously lost our way and it’s Friedmanite/Hayeckian economics that is to blame as is the ludicrous obsession with balanced budgets. It’s time to relearn the art of nation building.

    • Hello Bill,

      ok lost in writing /translation – basically what the DWP would have been paying to cover fuel poverty or those unable to pay the bills , is now put onto everyone else’s fuel bill.

      a stealth tax to be precise – means the DWP can be said to have “saved” that money when all that’s happened is that the cost is moved and hidden.

      and if things really get bad then the practice will become one of Shaun’s “unstable lifeboats”.

      Forbin

      PS:

      “Does anyone on here seriously believe food banks should have a reason to exist?”

      absolutely not !

      • The social costs referred to are carbon taxes as far as I’m aware. If you fall behind with your energy the bills a prepayment meter is installed and any debt paid off from it. There are no bail outs if you can’t afford it. Good on you for the food banks comment though!

  6. The working class ( anyone who needs to earn a living) are responsible for the huge drop in wages and employment opportunities over the last 4 decades.Apologies Shaun politics is unavoidable in this context .
    The public allied to a corrupt FPTP electoral system and a fascist print media have got us to this current situation and don’t want to own up but want to blame the EU which is going to make things much worse as manufacturing will be destroyed.
    The greatest period of prosperity for the masses was 1945 -1979 admittedly from a low base,housing education health all improved massively.
    Housing is not an investment it’s a fundamental necessity.FIAT money as initiated by Nixon on August 15th 1971 only ever has one outcome expansion of the money supply through credit till the purchasing power is inflated away.It also as we see promotes huge inequality if there is not a proper taxation system There should be no such thing as a Billionaire yet the masses blinkered as ever want one of these people to buy their football club 4 English teams in Euro finals delusional …bread and circuses. No English club managed by an Englishman has won a European trophy since Everton and Howard Kendall 34 years ago.

    • Hi Private Fraser

      I have my hopes that (Super) Frank Lampard will return to Stamford Bridge and put a dent in your statistic but yes there is a woeful shortage of English managers. As to housing I agree and that is why I want to put it in the consumer inflation measure.

  7. Hi Shaun,
    ” …The aim of this extremism is to install a permanent, capitalist theocracy that ensures a two-thirds society, with the majority divided and indebted, managed by a corporate class, and a permanent working poor. In Britain today, 63 per cent of poor children grow up in families where one member is working. For them, the trap has closed. More than 600,000 residents of Britain’s second city, Greater Manchester, are, reports a study, “experiencing the effects of extreme poverty” and 1.6 million are slipping into penury. Little of this social catastrophe is acknowledged in the bourgeois controlled media, notably the Oxbridge dominated BBC… ”
    John Pilger, 25 June 2016. Why the British said No to Europe.

    The extremism Pilger refers to is “neoliberalism”.
    The study he refers to was on a website called “www.povertymanchester.org” – it doesn’t exist today in the same format, or same language.
    Poor, poverty, destitution, penury – doesn’t really matter what you call it; if millions of people don’t have adequate shelter and food it is beyond a national disgrace.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.