The Bank of Mum and Dad feeds UK house prices

One of the features of the UK house market is the way that whilst prices are supposedly affordable so much “help” of one form or another is required by both first time buyers and those looking to trade up. There has been the “Help To Buy” scheme where government assistance is provided. Also many gloss over the fact that the only way that even the establishment can claim that this is “affordable” is because the Bank of England has put an enormous effort into pushing mortgage rates lower. For example it has cut Bank Rate to 0.25% deployed some £435 billion of UK government bond purchases called QE and since last August given banks a new subsidy scheme which already amounts to £57.5 billion.

The problem with these measures are that they are ultimately self-defeating and this is because they just drive house prices even higher. If we look at the Bank of England decision to push mortgage rates lower via its Funding for Lending Scheme in the summer of 2013 we then see according to the official data series that annual house price inflation accelerated to 9.4% in October of 2014. It then returned to that annual rate in June of last year. Moving to actual prices then the average house price in the UK peaked at just over £190,000 pre credit crunch and then fell to just below £155,000 in response to it. But now it is £217,502 as of February. This has led to another more implicit boost to house prices as more and more people believe that the Bank of England will not let house prices fall for more than a short period and will then provide a put option meaning that so many now sing along to Yazz.

Things may be a little hard now
But we’ll find a brighter day……

The only way is up, baby

The essential gap here is between overall house prices which have risen as described above and real wages which have fallen in the credit crunch era.  According to the official data the latter are still some 3% lower than the pre credit crunch period and even worse we face a period where they seem more likely to fall than rise.

Step forwards the Bank of Mum and Dad

Legal and General have looked into the situation where parents help their offspring by providing some or all of the deposit. From the Guardian.

The so-called bank of mum and dad will help fund property purchases worth about £75bn in 2017, the report says, including deposits for more than 298,000 mortgages. The £6.5bn figure is similar to the amount lent by the country’s ninth-biggest mortgage lender, Yorkshire Building Society, according to L&G.

Parental assistance is expected to have risen from an average of £17,000 in 2016 to £21,600 this year. Millennials are the biggest recipients, with 79% of the funding going to people under 30.

I suggest taking a pinch of salt with the exact detail as of course some will hand money over and keep the details private and parents have helped their children since time began but hopefully we are getting a broad sweep of scale here. If we continue with this there is more.

This is a 30% increase on the £5bn loaned in 2016, according to research from Legal & General and economics consultancy Cebr, and means parents will be involved in more than 25% of UK property transactions……..

The south-west of England and London will see the largest average parental contribution per transaction, at £30,000 and £29,400, with Wales the lowest at £12,500.

There should be little surprise at the amount of assistance being highest in the areas with a combination of the highest prices and highest rate of increase. This only adds to the problem described below.

Parents want to help their kids get on in life, and the bank of mum and dad is a testament to their generosity, but it is also a symptom of our broken housing market.

Is the mortgage market adjusting to this?

Yesterday there was this news about changes in the level of deposit required to get a mortgage. From Katie Allen in the Guardian.

Easier access to mortgages with a small deposit has offered some glimmers of hope for first-time buyers struggling to get on to Britain’s housing ladder, according to a new report.

Research on the amount of time it takes to save for a down payment on a home suggests buyers have been helped by the greater availability of mortgage loans at higher loan-to-value (LTV) ratios.

Are you thinking what I am thinking? Firstly that the market is accommodating the Bank of Mum and Dad ( BOMAD ) but secondly how loan to values are rising again. Remember when the establishment told us that such a thing would not be allowed to happen again?! From the Hamptons report.

Lenders are increasingly offering higher loan-to-value mortgages and the rates charged on them have come down more than for any other mortgage type.

It seems that Hamptons are not the only body who have spotted this trend.

A separate report from chartered surveyor e.surv found that buyers who put down a small deposit were making up an increasing share of the market.

What could go wrong? Are there any lessons about this we could learn from history.

Comment

There is an obvious problem here that has at least some of the features of a ponzi scheme. We see that “mum and dad” have a house and have large gains on it especially if they have been house owners for some time. They feel the “wealth effects” so trumpeted by central bankers and pass some of this wealth to their children to allow them to get a deposit together to buy a house they could not otherwise afford. On an individual level this is pretty much human nature in action but on a collective one it is pushing first time buyers up an inflationary pyramid. Their wages have fallen in real terms and yet they end up buying ever more expensive houses so it is no surprise they need ever more help. Actually the real wage picture has been one which is even worse than the median or average as younger people’s wages were hit hard by the credit crunch. Sadly the numbers are behind the times but there would have needed to have been quite a rise to catch up since.  Of course some of the above is a stereotype but the theme is there.

As we look at the situation we see that we are creating another one of “haves” and “have-nots”. Those with parental support will be better off than those without. Indeed as the Guardian pointed out those looking to save a deposit have a long time to wait.

The estate agent Hamptons International said that in the final months of 2016 it would take an average single first-time buyer 11 years and nine months to save a 15% deposit. But reducing the deposit to 10% cut the saving time to eight years and three months. For a deposit of just 5% the time to save was four years.

Meanwhile someone at the Bank of England is probably thinking if we made the deposit 0% they would have to wait at all………

Advertisements

28 thoughts on “The Bank of Mum and Dad feeds UK house prices

  1. Hi Shaun

    Great article as always. Do you know if the money from bomad is coming from mew’ing? Has there been an increase in mew during the last year?

    thanks

  2. Hi Shaun another great post.
    The term sheeple is derogatory but apt,people buying assets that they can’t afford due to disparity between income and cost of ownership.
    I have used the term asset but it is more than that it is a human necessity.
    The Government are primarily responsible for this situation.
    This is disposable income that is being drained from the wider economy causing a downward spiral in the economy

    • can’t eat an Ipad
      can’t live in one

      but its the only thing they can afford – on credit ….

      Forbin

  3. Shaun, this subject seems to have caught the MSM attention too today. As you point out its aĺl ponzi money but quite consistently in the MSM it is presented as an unfortunate and hand-wringing social issue for just the young who have inadvertently become victims….

    Your blog readership is however better informed. Many of us can remember the 1970’s when RangeRovers, 2nd homes, Cruises on Ocean Liners were the preserve of the very rich. Which Turkey would vote for a Christmas where your property portfolio fell in value, you had to buy your own Jaguar with net PAYE cash and you had to fund your Saga cruise from your pension?

    Many people, the unequal boomers love this paradise and will vite to keep it. Its just unfortunate that the destitute and grand children have to suffer but then when you remember how hard those boomers worked then they earned it!

    😉 Paul C.

    • Hi Paul C

      It is sad that what is not actually that complex an issue is so misrepresented by the media. I sometimes wonder how much of that is due to the power of advertising from the financial sector?

    • Hi stevie and thanks for the link.

      The thing that troubles me about this Canadian lender is that it has managed to get into so much trouble in the middle of quite a boom! What on earth has the regulator been doing? Will we find that what were called “liar loans” in the UK have appeared in Canada?

  4. You really are a cynical man Shaun, it’ll be different this time… Possibly maybe as Bjork sang…

    Uncertainty excites me, baby
    Who knows what’s going to happen?
    Lottery or car crash – or you’ll join a cult

  5. and the final turn would be ….

    1, HMG financing the loans at 0% interest with 0% deposits ?

    2, just get the BoE to do it ?

    Frankly if the house prices corrected themselves to more reasonable levels – just exactly how much capital would be vaporized ?

    and all to save a few rich Banks……. hah, they got their money for nothing and their cheques for free…… who’s the mugs? us taxpayers of course

    Forbin

    • Hi Forbin

      Well it is a furrow the ECB has ploughed with its TLTROs which offer an interest-rate of between 0% and -0.4%. Of course the banks will take their cut before they pass it on.

      What must confuse the ECB is the way that house prices have changed so little in France and Italy for example. It will be quietly happier about the rises in Spain and Ireland. Also do not forget the all time high in the Dax equity index in Germany today.

  6. QE/ZIRP aside, These exceptional levels of state intervention started under the free market Tory party with Dave, Gidiot and Carney at the helm … these people really ought to be locked up for fraud, a charge of financial terrorism would be needed. Islamic terrorists in the UK are nothing compared to the damage these excuse for human beings inflict on society to keep their own asset prices sky high.

    Saw this article in the DT which states what the BoE are wiling to do when we have a recession. aka extreme measures theyre willing to take should house prices fall.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/04/30/extreme-steps-may-needed-fight-next-recession-mps-warned/

    I will be holding my nose and voting Corbyn in June, on the basis he more for free markets than the Tory Party.

    • Free market died back in 2007 – some would say 2000/1

      soon as you get governments telling pension companies that they WILL finance complete wrecks of Banks instead of letting them go …. look at Ireland for a start

      corbyn or may – we’re stuffed

      Forbin

      • Free Market? dis that really exist pre 2000? Ref my reply to Arthur Cox for interference with free market.

    • oh god , just read that link……

      so it wasnt that it didnt work last time , it just they didn’t go far enough …..

      crazy , just crazy …….

      “Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat”

      don’t bother with gold, it will be made illegal to own it …… ( you’re a terrorist )

      Frobin

      • Yes it was hidden away on the DT website, hence just the 1 comment.(not mine)

        In a world where the US are looking like raising interest rates and winding back QE this will decimate the currency. Rock and a hard place is where they are in my view, but may be May knows this is their only way of keeping the plates spinning and will give the nod for it to happen in June.

        Sad thing is the incompetence and financial illiteracy of DIane Abbott is all over the news today but this barely gets a mention.

    • Exceptional State intervention began with Thatcher in the early 80’s – council house sold for virtually nothing, abolition of Mortgage Interest Relief at Source.

      Then she really got into her stride artificially jacking up the minimum lending rate (when it was actually followed by the banks) to circa 14.5% in the late 80’s – early 90’s when inflation was only circa 8%. Following the State engineered crash in the early 90’s rates collapsed down and lending criteria, set by the State via the BOE were relaxed so we had lending of 5X salary when rates were 7% and employment and income was no longer confirmed. I could go on but the point has already been hammered home.

  7. While official statistics fail to count house price inflation as, err, inflation, the government gets a higher GDP number and the City gets our money.
    I think it will all go pear shaped if our financial overlords start thinking that May might just regard a red-white-and-blue brexit as a higher priority than a City-friendly one.

    • Hi arrbee

      Having just listened to the champions league semi final tonight I can see that Cristiano Ronaldo has a great statistics in terms of goal scoring. But as you say the official statistics would include shots that soar into rows J,K and L if his record was in GDP style. .

  8. As you say Shaun, the Bank of Mum and dad has been an ever present force in the housing market since, well, since the housing market began probably but I’ve definitely seen it in operation in the mid 80’s via my own friends so…..nothing new here.

  9. Pingback: Weekly Roundup, 9th May 2017 - 7 Circles

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s