The UK government spends rather a lot for its austere claims

As we approach the end of the calendar year it is time to be a little more reflective. If one does that with this morning’s release on the UK Public Finances it is hard to avoid the view that the present government is somewhat spendthrift.

Borrowing in the financial year-to-November 2023 was £116.4 billion, £24.4 billion more than in the same eight-month period last year and the second highest financial year-to-November borrowing on record.

Another way of putting it is that it is fiscally expansionary which contrasts with the way that the word austerity is often bandied around as a description of it. One can argue that inflation is a factor here via its impact on cost of living payments and inflation linking. But that is a little awkward for the Prime Minister as the inflation fires were lit by perhaps the most expansionary UK fiscal policy ever via one Chancellor Sunak. Perhaps the Prime Minister could have a word with him.

November Borrowing

That general theme continues as I look at these numbers.

In November 2023, the public sector spent more than it received in taxes and other income, requiring it to borrow £14.3 billion. This was £0.9 billion less than was borrowed in November 2022 and is the fourth highest November borrowing since monthly records began in 1993, behind those of the 2020 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic period, the energy support schemes period of 2022, and in 2010 following the global financial crisis.

We are now supposed to be fully recovered from Covid in economic terms as we spent enough to achieve that. But we still seem to be borrowing a substantial sum. If we look back a year this was a government that was presented by the establishment as having what they considered to be sensible policies  as in getting borrowing back under control. Whereas we now know they in theory tightened policy but we are still borrowing large sums. This November might be considered to be a month where we would borrow less than last year due to the cost of the energy support schemes, but the reality is that we have borrowed very little less.

If you look at the total expenditure it does not look too bad and you might return to some sort of austerity theme.

In November 2023, central government’s total expenditure was £87.6 billion, £0.7 billion more than in November 2022 and the highest November total since monthly records began in 1993.

But the end of the energy support schemes changes that.

Subsidies paid by central government were £2.2 billion in November 2023, £3.1 billion less than in November 2022. This is largely because of the cost of the Energy Price Guarantee (for households) and Energy Bill Relief Scheme (for businesses) affecting this month last year.

There was another bit of that in the other category.

Payments recorded under central government “other current grants” were £1.7 billion in November 2023, £2.0 billion less than in November 2022, largely because of the cost of last year’s Energy Bills Support Scheme.

So a change of the order of £5 billion.

On the other side of the coin Receipts were higher.

Central government’s receipts were £77.6 billion, £3.6 billion more than in November 2022 and the highest November since monthly records began in 1993.

You may have spotted that these numbers should have led to a bigger fall in November borrowing. But there are other factors in there such as the Bank of England adding an extra £1.3 billion to the borrowing this year. That is another addition to the debit side on all its QE bond buying on which it so rarely gets challenged. I will return to that later as with the recent declines in bond yields its 2023 sales of bonds look awful. Or if you prefer it has added selling at the bottom to buying at the top.

Debt Interest

We can cover a lot of ground with this one and we can start with November.

In November 2023, the interest payable on central government debt was £7.7 billion, £0.1 billion more than in November 2022 and the highest November total since monthly records began in April 1997.

This became more of a factor as two influences came into play. First was the rise in inflation and specifically RPI inflation which pushed the expenditure on paying interest on them ( around a fifth of our debt higher). Then came the rises in bond yields which pushed the interest payments on the rest of our debt higher. As you can see above things stopped getting worse in November if you will indulge me for £100 million.

Part of the change has been this.

In November 2023, capital uplift was £3.0 billion and was largely determined by the 0.5% increase in the RPI between August and September 2023.

For those unaware most UK index-linkers have a three month lag to the inflation rate and thus changes are on their way. What I mean by that is that we already know the next two months and they were -0.2% and -0.1% so falls will happen soon and we may see more of that ahead. For example the latest energy price estimates for the April Energy Price Cap suggest a fall then.

Next up is the fact that issuing debt for the UK is now a lot cheaper than it was as recently as October. As I type this the benchmark ten-year yield is now 3.55% whereas it peaked at 4.7% in October. So the bond market rally you have been reading about means that going forwards it will be a fair bit cheaper to issue new debt and to refinance existing debt.

Bank of England QE Problems

I said I would return to this and we can look at it via the UK long Gilt future. It bought a lot of bonds in the range 135-140 and it has sold some in the second half of this year in the mid 90s. Actually down to a low of 92. So there are strategic losses here from as I put it earlier buying at the top and selling at the bottom.

Also there is the tactical issue of selling bonds down to an equivalent of 92 and then seeing a ten point rally as we are above 102 as I type this. Yet this so rarely seems to get questioned.

Or if you want the change in the situation put another way.

The borrowing of both of these subsectors is affected by payments totalling £33.2 billion made by central government to the BoE over the last eight months under the Asset Purchase Facility Fund (APF) indemnity agreement. This was £32.4 billion more than the £0.8 billion paid in the same period last year.

Comment

The situation with the UK Public Finances is one which sees quite a few views bandied about. For instance in the over a decade I have been reporting on these numbers there has been a lot of talk of austerity but especially in the more recent period we have seen some extraordinary fiscal deficits. That drum beat seems to be continuing as we have a government which claims to be austere but is in fact fiscally expansionary.

Next up is the issue of the first rule of OBR Club which is that the OBR is always wrong.

In March 2023, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast that borrowing would settle at £152.4 billion in the financial year ending March 2023. In its Economic and fiscal outlook – November 2023, the OBR reduced this estimate by £24.1 billion to £128.3 billion.

As you can see their skill set not only involves getting the present and future wrong as they add the past to it. But on a more fundamental level they predicted a severe recession for this year leading to reports of a “Black Hole” for the Public Finances. Government policy was changed in response to this and it was changed in the wrong direction. In a way we see it from this.

Public sector net debt excluding the Bank of England (BoE) was £2,418.6 billion at the end of November 2023, or around 88.3% of GDP, £252.8 billion (or 9.2 percentage points of GDP) less than the wider measure. This difference is largely a result of the BoE’s quantitative easing activities, including the gilt-purchasing activities of the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) Fund.

Actually in a theme of the times deciding on the national debt is not as clear cut as you might reasonably think but I think the headline of 97.5% is misleading. Probably it is more like 91-92%.

 

14 thoughts on “The UK government spends rather a lot for its austere claims

  1. Basically you now have two left wing socialist governments, the last attempt at conservative policies was the Truss/Kwarteng budget that led to her being removed in another socialist/WEF coup, so in the next election you have two parties but only one set of policies, in other words unless you believe in:

    Rejoining the EU,
    More debt leads to wealth,
    Uncontrolled mass immigration is a good thing and a net economic benefit to the economy,
    Woke/PC policies,
    The replacement of our carbon based energy with ever more expensive and restricted renewables,
    Climate change and all the changes that will come with that.
    Eventual 15-minute cities.
    Restrictions on meat consumption.
    The continued dismantling and shutdown of the NHS.
    The eventual introduction of a CBDC.

    There is no point voting- there isn’t a single party that will try and stop the above.

      • Yes, glad to read your’e self sufficiency extends to beer! I’d recommend Youtube as it has some great videos with some really dedicated brewers who could easily make a living professionally and sell it commercially if they wanted, the cost of the equipment is another factor, as you get better and better and start approaching micro brewery quality, the engineering gets really expensive, the Americans have both the money and huge garages in which to do this and their homewrew/microbrewery scene is massive, but if you have a mate who is a pipe fitter/ engineer he might be able to help you make big improvements in time and quality.
        If I return to homebrew when I retire I think I’ll just stick to making “country wines”(made from fruit and grape juice), much less hassle!.

    • Yes, people over a certain age realise “things aren’t going to get better”, more a case of accepting its time for a new bunch of Quislings to screw them over!

      If we actually had austerity (i.e. capitalism) from 2008, then the nation would be a far happier and more equal society, as the overleveraged fools in the run up to 2008 would have been the ones to suffer, as opposed kids who hadn’t even left school then.

      From what i see, last 2 decades have been austere for average paid workers too proud, or ignorant to know how to live a life off benefits.

      Certainly hasn’t been austere if you’ve been in the government fast lane for contracts, or live a life on benefits. (Thats 21st century western communism for you)

  2. So, would I not be correct in stating that, if these Government investors, whose investments are performing like a seven-year-olds, worked in the private sector, they’d have got the bum’s rush some time ago?
    So, where are the sackings?
    Perhaps there are no sackings because they are doing precisely what the government wants: haemorrhaging taxpayers’ money into the private sector, such that politicians’ post career corrupt sinecures, from bank & other financial institutions,are effectively paid in advance by the taxpayer.
    That is corruption & treason.
    £1/4 trn to bail out banks in GFC, how much for the crumbling NHS?

    • I’ve long believed that if the BoE Govnr. has to write a letter to the Chancellor explaining why inflation is not on target the third letter should include his or her resignation.

      • Why? The GBoE has no influence on inflation (look at the data!), especially when there is no inflation. Like all central banksters, he just follows the bond market, which bets on the real economy, and in effect, drives the bus with all the central bank passengers in it, picking up and dropping off political leaders along the way.

        Before you start spitting out your tea, price rises are not inflation. Inflation is when credit/money-supply expands faster than the economy. These price rises are politically-driven scarcity, by leaders who are like toddlers in the cockpit of a 747, pulling levers, pressing buttons that say: “sanctions”, “lockdowns”, “netzero”, “immigration”.

  3. Public sector pension liabilities are the big headache over the coming years as millions of baby boomers can afford to retire at 55 and take the slight penalty for doing so. If they live to 110 which is highly likely they will have 55 years of state pension and public sector pension inflation linked. How will the next generation afford this as they have to pay for it through taxation as no provision unlike private sector pension schemes invested in stock markets. The US is a good example of what is heading our way just ask why Californians are leaving the nicest state in the US huge annual property taxes to pay for the public sector pensions.

    • Who lives to 110???

      This topic is well known about over here and I have predicted the end of the state pension as we know it numerous times.People living longer, millions of immigrants entitled to a pension never having paid a penny into the system or in the event of working, paying minimal tax and national insurance(many work in the black economy so pay no tax), an aging population with less and less wokers supporting more and more retirees, government finances requiring inflation to reduce the cost of repaying current and future debt results in an inability to link the pension to the very inflation they have caused, etc etc.

      In the US the state with the biggest liabilities and the least resources to fund them is Illinois, but California, New York and New Jersey aren’t far behind and are much much bigger, in California you have 13 million people on the Medi-Cal state healthcare programme and 22 million sate government workers being paid three times what they should be with gold plated pensions and health plans that cannot be fired, you have firemen and policemen retiring on $200,000+ pensions, and like Birmingham over here – they will immediately turn to the federal government for a bailout, which if granted would lead to a tsunami of other states making similar claims, the hyperinflationary consequnces are too obvious to point out.

    • Easy to pay for such things, we can just sell houses to each other at ever increasing multiples of peoples wages.

      Then carve these house into flats or HMO’s to make them more productive.

      It’s worked for 25 years so far!

    • I don’t think it works quite like that. You can retire at any age you want to, but you can’t draw a state pension until you reach state pension age. State pension age is set so that , on average and given life expectancy, you don’t draw the state pension for more than one third of your adult life.
      And there are rules about NI Contributions and Credits

      As always I could be wrong.

  4. shaun,

    “We are now supposed to be fully recovered from Covid in economic terms as we spent enough to achieve that. But we still seem to be borrowing a substantial sum. ”

    The GOV still been paying out cost of living payments, I think the last one of £300 paid in November, then a payment towards energy of between £500 and £600 in December dependant on age.

    Just a quicki on yesterdays inflation data, some fincial reporters were saying- although inflation had fallen prices were still not falling but not rising as fast, or possibly rising more slowly” I cannot remember the exact wording but you get the gist.

    • Hi Peter

      I will start with the inflation issue and can only say that those reporters need to look a little deeper because both the CPI and RPI indices did fall on the month. So we had falling prices overall.

      As to the cost of living payments they will be included here.

      “Net social benefits paid by central government were £24.2 billion in November 2023, £1.2 billion more than in November 2022. In recent months we have seen large increases in benefit payments largely because of inflation-linked benefits uprating and cost-of-living payments.”

  5. Like all socialist parties, the Tories are addicted to unsustainable debt.

    Meanwhile, the CHF has been gradually rising against the GBP for years.

    The Swiss have very low debt, and lots of gold. What does that tell you?

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.