The ECB hints at buying equities and replacing bank intermediation

A feature of this virus pandemic is the way that it seems to have infected central bankers with the impact of them becoming power mad as well as acting if they are on speed. Also they often seen lost in a land of confusion as this from yesterday from the Governor of the Bank of France highlights.

Naturally, there is a huge amount of uncertainty over how the economic environment will evolve, but this is probably less true for inflation.

Okay so the picture for inflation is clearer, how so?

 In the short term, the public health crisis is disinflationary, as exemplified by the drop in oil prices. Inflation is currently very low, at 0.3% in the euro area and 0.4% in France in April; granted, it is particularly tricky to measure prices in the wake of the lockdown, due to the low volume of data reporting and transactions, and the shift in consumer habits, temporary or otherwise.

This is not the best of starts as we see in fact that one price has fallen ( oil) but many others are much less clear due to the inability to measure them.Of course having applied so much monetary easing Francois Villeroy is desperate to justify it.

The medium-term consequences are more open to debate, due notably to uncertainties over production costs, linked for example to health and environmental standards and the potential onshoring of certain production lines; the differences between sectors could be significant, leading to variations in relative prices rather than a general upward path.

As you can see he moves from not being able to measure it to being very unsure although he later points out it is expected to be 1% next year which in his mind justifies his actions. There is the usual psychobabble about price stability being an inflation rate of 2% per annum which if course it isn’t.  #

Policy

It is probably best if you live in a glass house not to throw stones but nobody seems to have told Francois that.

Our choice at the ECB is more pragmatic: since March, we, like the Fed and the Bank of England, have greatly expanded and strengthened our armoury of instruments and in so doing refuted all those – and remember there were a lot of them only a few months ago – who feared that the central banks were “running out of ammunition”.

I will return to that later but let us move onto what Francois regards as longer-term policies.

First, in September 2019, we amended our use of negative rates with a tiering system to mitigate their adverse impacts on bank intermediation. I see no reason to change these rates now.

Actually it has not taken long for Francois to contradict himself on the ammunition point as “see no reason” means he feels he cannot go further into negative interest-rates for the general population. You may also note that he starts with “My Precious! My Precious!” which is revealing. Oh and he has cut the TLTRO interest-rate for banks to -1% more recently.

Plus.

Meanwhile, asset purchases, in operation since mid-2014, reached a total of EUR 2,800 billion in April 2020 and will continue at a monthly average pace of more than EUR 30 billion.

Make of this what you will.

We can also add forward guidance to this arsenal,….. This forward guidance provides considerable leeway to adapt to economic changes thanks to its self-stabilising endogenous component.

New Policy

Suddenly he did cut interest-rates and we are back to “My Precious! My Precious!”

The supply of liquidity to banks has been reinforced in terms of quantity and, above all, through an incentivising price structure. Interest rates on TLTROIII operations were cut dramatically on 12 March and again on 30 April and are now, at -1%

There is also this.

Above all, we have created the EUR 750 billion Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP)…….First, flexibility in terms of time. We are not bound by a monthly allocation…….Second, flexibility in terms of volume. Unlike the PSPP, we are not committed to a fixed amount – today, the PEPP can go “up to EUR 750 million”, and we stated on 30 April that we were prepared to go further if need be.

If we look at the weekly updates which have settled at around 30 billion Euros per week the original 750 billion will run out as September moves into October if that pace is maintained. So it looks likely that there will be more although as the summer progresses things will of course change quite a bit.

Then Francois displays even more of what we might call intellectual flexibility. You see he is not targeting spreads or “yield curve control” or a “spread control” but he is….

While there is a risk that the effects of the crisis may in some cases be asymmetric, we will not allow adverse market dynamics to lead to unwarranted interest rate hikes in some countries.

So he is trying to have his cake and eat it here.

Innovation

This word is a bit of a poisoned chalice as those have followed the Irish banking crisis will know. But let me switch to this subject and open with a big deal for the ECB especially since the sleeping giant known as the German Constitutional Court has shown signs of opening one eye, maybe.

And this brings me to my third point, flexibility in terms of allocation between countries.

He means Italy of course.

Next up is one of the sillier ideas around.

Allow me to say a final word on another development under discussion: the possibility of “going direct” to finance businesses without going through the bank channel. The truth is that we do this already, and have done since 2016, by being among the first central banks to buy corporate bonds.

He is probably keen because of this.

The NEU-CP market in Paris is by far the most active in the euro area, with outstandings of EUR 72 billion in mid-May, and the Banque de France’s most recent involvement since the end of March has been very effective and widely acknowledged by industry professionals.

Ah even better he has been able to give himself a slap on the back as well.

He is eyeing even more.

With its new Main Street Lending Program, the Fed recently went a step further by giving itself the possibility to fund the purchases of bank loans to businesses, via a special-purpose vehicle created with a US Treasury Department guarantee

If banks are bad, why are we subsidising them so much? Also why would central banks full of banks be any better?

After sillier let us have silliest.

ECB’s Villeroy: Would Not Put At Forefront Likelihood Of Buying Up Equities ( @LiveSquawk )

Comment

There is a familiar feel to this as we observe central bankers twisting and turning to justify where they find themselves. Let me start with something which in their own terms has been a basic failure.

This sluggishness in prices comes after a decade of persistently below-target inflation, which has averaged 1.3%.

This provides a range of contexts as of course the inflation picture would look very different if they made any real effort to measure  the one third or so of expenditure that goes on housing costs. In other areas this would be a scandal as imagine how ignoring a third of Covid-19 cases would be received? Also you might think that such failure after negative interest-rates and 2.8 billion Euros of QE might lead to a deeper rethink. This policy effort has in fact ended up really being about what was denied in this speech which is reducing bond yields so governments can borrow more cheaply. The hints in it have helped the ten-year yield in Italy fall to 1.55% as I type this.

Oh the subject of the ECB buying equities I am reminded that I suggested on the 2nd of March it would be next to make that leap of faith. I still think it is in the running however the German Constitutional Court may have slowed it up. The hint has helped the Euro Stoxx 50 go above 3000 today as equity markets continue to be pumped up on liquidity and promises. But more deeply we see that if we look at Japan what has been achieved by the equity buying? The rich have got richer but the economy has not seen any boost and in fact pre this crisis was in fact doing worse. So he is singing along with Bonnie Tyler.

I was lost in France
In the fields the birds were singing
I was lost in France
And the day was just beginning
As I stood there in the morning rain
I had a feeling I can’t explain
I was lost in France in love

 

21 thoughts on “The ECB hints at buying equities and replacing bank intermediation

  1. Hi Shaun, I went out yesterday in my home town of Bristol. First of all I though I would socially distance by taking my canoe on the floating harbour but the Police (harbour master) ordered me out, no leisure allowed. I then chose to walk around the harbour and found a cafe open, 1 in 1 out control, had an iced coffee and cornish pasty = total cost £7.50 I thought that was inflationary, I guess if I added an icream, more like £12.00

    🙂

    • I thought caffe’s were closed unless you took away the food?

      But in any event you can see where all this is going its going to be very expensive for pubs, and any kind of eating places to operate without putting prices up.

      Many will surely go to the wall once they are allowed to open and no relief given to staff through furlough of employees.

      I suspect the UK desperate to get the economy up and running as they cannot continue to support people the way they are presently doing.

  2. Shaun<

    "A feature of this virus pandemic is the way that it seems to have infected central bankers with the impact of them becoming power mad as well as acting if they are on speed. Also they often seen lost in a land of confusion as this from yesterday from the Governor of the Bank of France highlights."

    The bankers and governments scratching their heads to prevent a collapse in their individual economies, the UK ready to support major UK companies going to the wall and buying equities in the UK may be on the agenda as well, maybe this is one reason for the rise in equities recently, all are thinking the same thing.

    I do like the poem.

    Although poetry isn't one of my talents I think the one below by Empedocles' fits the bill as well as to what is going on at the moment|:

    "Weak and narrow are the powers implanted in the limbs of man; many the woes that fall on them and blunt the edges of thought; short is the measure of the life in death through which they toil. Then are they borne away; like the smoke that vanishes into the air; and what they dream is they know is but the little that each hath stumbled upon in wandering about the world. Yet boast they all that they have learned the whole. Vain fools! For what that is no eye hath seen nor ear hath heard, nor can it be conceived by the mind of man"

    • Hi Peter

      I went to see As You Like It with some friends at the Regents Park Theatre and it contains this from what Colonel Ghadaffi called Sheik Speare.

      Jaques to Duke Senior

      All the world’s a stage,
      And all the men and women merely players;
      They have their exits and their entrances,
      And one man in his time plays many parts,
      His acts being seven ages. At first, the infant,
      Mewling and puking in the nurse’s arms.
      Then the whining schoolboy, with his satchel
      And shining morning face, creeping like snail
      Unwillingly to school. And then the lover,
      Sighing like furnace, with a woeful ballad
      Made to his mistress’ eyebrow. Then a soldier,
      Full of strange oaths and bearded like the pard,
      Jealous in honor, sudden and quick in quarrel,
      Seeking the bubble reputation
      Even in the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice,
      In fair round belly with good capon lined,
      With eyes severe and beard of formal cut,
      Full of wise saws and modern instances;
      And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts
      Into the lean and slippered pantaloon,
      With spectacles on nose and pouch on side;
      His youthful hose, well saved, a world too wide
      For his shrunk shank, and his big manly voice,
      Turning again toward childish treble, pipes
      And whistles in his sound. Last scene of all,
      That ends this strange eventful history,
      Is second childishness and mere oblivion,
      Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything.”

      • Hats off to Robert Champion (dec)
        Seven ages, first puking and mewling.
        Then very pissed off with one’s schooling.
        Then fucks and then fights,
        Then judging men’s rights
        Then sitting in slippers. Then drooling.

  3. “EU asset purchases, in operation since mid-2014, reached a total of EUR 2.8 trillion in April”
    UK asset purchases are around GBP 0.7 trillion to date.

    Given that a significant amount of QE is in the Stock Market (as ETFs or more recently actual stocks) if the market truly crashes, as most seem to be expecting, should we not be reporting the current actual market value of “our” Central Bank holdings and the “losses” we have sustained?

    And, since QE itself is justified as selling future government bonds (loans), then are we not seeing a widening gap between the “loans” we have taken out and our total “asset value” as a nation, thus making our long term indebtedness grow with every % shrinkage of the stock (and bond) markets?

    Or are we simply buying our own debt back with printed money, in which case why don’t we pay off the National Debt in it’s entirety by printing money, because clearly it doesn’t “leak” into the economy for the 90% as inflation, except house prices & rents, (which we statistically ignore!) and merely enriches the 10% and boosts the luxuory yacht market?

  4. Hello Shaun,

    for most of last year we could see the economy was CTD ( circling the drain ) and this year was going to be bad .

    Then a God send came along in the form of a pandemic that at first glance looked awful enough . Indeed it did look grim and of course never let a good crisis go to waste!

    Except all the things they are doing and will do will not help – more debt , really? , (sighs ) I just don’t think they get it, its just more of the same , no original thinking or looking up from the floor ……..

    Still I have a good seat and the popcorn is fresh .

    Forbin

    • forbin,

      The governments lost the plot they seem to think printing money and building up debt is going to just go away.

      What beats me is who is holding all this money to buy buy all this debt at negative interest rates and will it eventually run out.

      Certainly its not the ordinary Joe Public buying large amounts of negative gilts!

      If its pension funds are they gambling on a crash so they can redeem the gilts later on and buy back assets at a lower price. I could understand that on a short dated gilt but not on 5 years 10 year or 30 years.

      • hi peter,

        I believe the Pension funds are required by law to purchase these bonds along with banks, investment trusts ,private people and overseas buyers. Also there’s 23% of bonds purchased as part of the QE. program.

        I wonder myself as to why anyone would want a negative yield unless its insurance to at least get back some of your money !

        not normal times but certainly interesting !

        Forbin

      • “What beats me is who is holding all this money to buy buy all this debt at negative interest rates and will it eventually run out.”

        People who will not lose money of their own.

  5. Great blog as usual, Shaun. Thank you for alerting us to Governor Villeroy de Galhau’s speech. I read the whole speech on the Bank of France website. I notice that the Governor appears to be a big fan of “Temporary Average Inflation Targeting”. A footnote to the speech gives a reference to a paper by Helicopter Ben Bernanke to see what this is about:

    Click to access bernanke_rethinking_macro_final.pdf

    Bernanke’s ideas are very similar to the former deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, Jean Boivin, switching to a price level targeting regime in a recession, or, as Bernanke puts it, when the central bank has hit the ZLB, as the US Fed has now. Price level targeting, applied across the business cycle, has the objective of making sure the central bank meets its inflation target. Bygones are not bygones. What Bernanke advocates is that the central bank not treat as bygones downward shocks to the inflation rate in a recession while it will presumably continue to treat as bygones upward shocks to the inflation rate in a recovery or an expansion. He claims that the overall inflation rate will remain anchored at the 2% target, but it seems dubious that this would happen. He posits the US Fed pledging to never raise the federal funds rate when it hits the ZLB, as it did in April, until the PCEPILFE inflation rate is back at 2%. (It is hard to see why now he would focus on the core inflation rate when as Chair of the Fed he introduced an inflation target based on the PCEPI itself.) The April PCEPILFE update isn’t available yet, but imagine instead that the Fed took the US CPI-U as its target. The annual inflation rate for April 2020, the month the federal funds rate dropped to its ZLB, was 0.3%. In order to get the average inflation rate back to 2.0% over the period April 2019 to April 2022, the US Fed would have to aim for an average inflation rate of almost 2.9% for the period April 2020 to April 2022. The inflationary implications of such so called temporary measures is obvious, since there would be no similar rule in place saying that if the inflation rate spiked to 3.7% for some reason, the US Fed would not be obliged to target a 1.1% average inflation rate for the next two years to bring the overall inflation rate down to 2%. It would only be obliged to gradually bring the inflation rate back to its 2% target.
    I noticed in the accompanying interview with BFM TV, Governor Villeroy de Galhau made no reference to Temporary Average Inflation Targeting, so hopefully he isn’t that strongly wedded to the idea. It’s an interesting interview in another sense though. The Governor’s full-throated defence of the French government’s fiscal measures to attack the COVID-19 recession in that interview is really over the top. I thought Stephen Poloz was bad for sticking his nose into fiscal policy, but this Frenchman is much worse!

    • Hi Andrew and thank you.

      The temporary price level targeting suggestions are something of a repeat of what Charles Evans of the Chicago Fed argued for some years back. In essence you look to “catch up” any shortfalls to the 2% target. Applying that would in terms of simple interest leave the ECB with a 7% shortfall ( and more if compounded) to recover.What is not explained is how?After all they have negative interest-rates and a bloated balance sheet already.

      The love of expansionary fiscal policy is quite a reversal for the ECB. After all they prescribed the reverse for Greece and others! But as you imply there is not much independence to be found here….

      • Thank you for your reply, Shaun. I was vague on Charles Evans’s proposals, but you are right as usual. Bernanke seems to have derived his idea from Charles Evans, who originally suggested what he called state-contingent price level targeting in October 2010. However, Bernanke gives Evans little or no credit for it in his paper. In a follow-up paper in 2017, Evans writes: “[O]ne issue with price-level targeting is that its promise of above-target inflation for a limited period of time could be confused with the central bank raising its longer-run target. Given the prominent public debate over inflation targets in 2010, avoiding the misperception of a stealth increase in the inflation target would have required Odyssean communications of enormous (Herculean) proportions.” It seems to me the confusion is justified. It is hard to see how a policy of state-contingent price level targeting wouldn’t imply a target inflation rate in excess of two percent over the business cycle.

    • “In order to get the average inflation rate back to 2.0% over the period April 2019 to April 2022, the US Fed would have to aim for an average inflation rate of almost 2.9% for the period April 2020 to April 2022.”

      According to T. G. Congdon, the average inflation rate for the period will be much higher?

      “I have decided to increase my concern about these developments and propose the following:
       2020 will see the highest annual % increase in the broadly-defined quantity of money in the USA in peacetime, with the peak figure above 20% and possibly even above 25%,
       Exceptionally high money growth will be accompanied and followed by an inflationary boom, even if the precise quarter-by-quarter changes in output, employment and prices are difficult to assess at this stage and will depend (among other considerations) on the medical situation, and
       Consumer inflation at annual double-digit % rates is very likely at some point in the next two/three years, and – without a radical change in monetary policy that dampens money growth – the inflation outbreak will not be easy to bring under control.”

      Click to access Extra-money-note-May-2020.pdf

      “The situation is evolving rapidly,…but it is already clear that the United States of America may in 2020 or early 2021 record the fastest increase in the quantity of money, broadly-defined, in its peacetime history. The main news this month is that the subjunctive is no longer the right tense to use. In April US M3, as estimated by the Shadow Government Statistics consultancy, rose by 7.5%, while the annual increase in M3 reached 20.5%. This was the fastest increase in US peacetime history. Federal Reserve data on deposits are already available for the first two weeks of May. The month of May will probably see another M3 advance of 3% – 4%, so that the annual rate of increase moves up to 23% – 24%. The table below shows the latest money growth numbers in the main jurisdictions. A fair comment is that the policy reaction has been most stimulatory (and almost certainly most inflationary) in the USA, . . . .”

      Click to access Monthly_e_mail_2005_Global_money_round_up.pdf

  6. “A feature of this virus pandemic is the way that it seems to have infected central bankers with the impact of them becoming power mad . . . ”
    In the case of the ECB, without any form of democratic ‘control’?
    “85:00 The deliberations of the ECB’s decision-making bodies are secret.
    85:05 The mere attempt at influencing the ECB,
    85:08 for instance through democratic debate and discussion,
    85:11 is forbidden according to the Maastricht Treaty.
    85:17 The ECB is an international organisation
    85:20 that is above and outside the laws and jurisdictions
    85:23 of any individual nation.
    85:27 Its senior staff carry diplomatic passports
    85:30 and the files and documents inside the European Central Bank
    85:34 cannot be searched or impounded
    85:36 by any police force or public prosecutor.
    85:43 The ECB is well known among economists
    85:46 as one of the world’s most powerful and least transparent central banks,
    85:52 yet its former president, Jean-Claude Trichet,
    85:56 dealt with this problem
    85:57 by merely asserting that there was no problem: . . . ”
    From: ‘Princes of the Yen: Central Bank Truth Documentary’

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.