How the Euro area and ECB mislead people over the inflation numbers

This week has brought something of a confession from the European Central Bank. It relates to something that they and the Euro area establishment have kept out of their official inflation measure for 25 years now. It is owner occupied housing costs and they matter a lot which from time to time they confess as I recall a speech from Chief Economist Lane several years ago saying that they were up to a third of peoples spending. Since then the ECB has set out on a policy of making these costs higher via its interest-rate rises.

If we look at its mortgage interest-rate measure we are told this.

new loans to households for house purchase decreased by 4 basis points to 3.84%, driven by interest rate effect

The crucial point here is the level and as these are for February the recent rises in bond yields will mean we are now back to circa 4% ( the peak has been 3.97%). That compares with a long period where they have been below 1.5% and it only went above that level in April 2022. So in terms of the cost of living those paying a mortgage in the Euro area have seen an increase of 2.5% in round numbers which is a lot.

ECB Analysis

A couple of ECB economists have taken a look at the real world impact of this and unsurprisingly start with this.

In recent quarters, euro area households have been faced with higher housing costs, including mortgage costs.

You do not need a Phd to discover that! But then they start to pit some numbers on the actual impact.

Chart A, panel a), shows the dynamics of the overall monthly housing-related burden for outright owners, renters and mortgagors. In January 2024 households were paying an average of €765 per month in total housing-related costs, including utilities, home maintenance and rent or mortgage costs.

As you can see this is a major factor in people’s budgets and you should not ignore a large component of it. But then we get their view on hos much inflation in this area has been understated during the recent inflationary surge.

Over the period from July 2022 – the beginning of the interest rate hiking cycle – to January 2024, the average housing costs reported in the Consumer Expectations Survey rose cumulatively by around 10.2%, compared with a cumulative rise in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) of 5.5%.

As you can see this is a big deal and later in the piece they confirm this as they get around to how much of an issue this is for household budgets.

Housing costs take up around 20% of disposable income for outright owners, 40% for renters and 35% for mortgagors.

If we were discussing any other area there would be screams for its inclusion. But because it has always been excluded then we are in the arena of the military dictum that one of the best ways of hiding something is to put it in plain sight. I think that modern culture leading to shorter attention spans and the decline of journalism have also contributed to the lack of criticism and analysis.

National Variations

Our 2 economists sort of get there.

For mortgagors in particular, the higher costs would seem to be driven by the upper end of the distribution, with the cost for the lower end remaining relatively constant.

In plain English some with fixed-rate mortgages will not have been affected, but those with variable-rate ones will have been severely affected. That brings me to something they will have missed as the situation in Portugal became so bad that the government changed the rules to allow some mortgage payments to be deferred.

A set of measures is in place until 31 December 2023 to mitigate the effects of the rise in interest rates on variable rate loans for the purchase or construction of permanent residential property with an outstanding value of €300,000 or less. ( Bank of Portugal)

There were other reliefs for larger mortgages but the point was that the rise in mortgage costs was so high in Portugal that the rules were changed to avoid an economic crisis. Actually we do see that in this report because it is for numbers up to January this year and Portugal has one of the lowest housing costs quoted at 600 Euros a month. That would mislead the unwary who do not realise that the numbers have been fudged! Or to be more specific that poor battered can has just been kicked again.

Anyway the report puts it like this..

With regard to individual euro area countries, Chart A, panel c), shows that there is significant cross-country heterogeneity in housing costs and that the difference between costs excluding mortgage payments and those including such payments is substantial, especially for countries such as Italy and Spain that tend to have a higher proportion of adjustable-rate mortgages.

Unfortunately we just get a chart rather than detailed numbers but their calculations are that Spain has monthly housing costs of 750 Euro a month if you include mortgages and 400 if you do not and for Italy it is just under 800 Euros a month with and 550 without. Ireland has the highest housing costs at 1200 Euros a month with mortgages and 900 without them.

Pinocchio Time

Our 2 economists must suddenly have realised the consequences of their work and feared being sent to the ECB cellar where the cake trolley with its espressos and croissants never arrives.

The housing cost ratio, defined as total housing costs divided by disposable income, has remained unchanged overall since the beginning of 2022.

So disposable income has magically risen by the same amount? What a happy coincidence. Funny how the wages figures have somehow missed this as we have been recording quite substantial falls in real wages in the Euro area and remember that is before you add mortgage costs to the inflation numbers.

Also this bit is rather inconvenient for the “remained unchanged” claim.

More households, and in particular lower-income households, have indicated in recent months that they expect to make late payments of their rent or mortgage and/or their utilities. Given the present and future effects of both increased interest rates and loss of purchasing power owing to inflation, the ability of households to meet their housing-related costs and mortgage payments is a source of concern, especially for lower-income households.

How does “remained unchanged” morph into “loss of purchasing power”?

“For, you see, so many out-of-the-way things had happened lately, that Alice had begun to think that very few things indeed were really impossible.” ( Lewis Carroll)

Comment

As you have seen the exclusion of owner-occupied housing costs means that the cost of living in the Euro area has risen by much more than what the official inflation rate has told us. In technical terms it is the difference between a macroeconomic measure and a cost of living one. Just because a central bank should ignore mortgage costs in its measure as otherwise it ends up rather chasing its tail, does not mean people are not facing a higher cost of living. Rather curiously the Bank of Canada either forgot or does not realise this.

But back to the central point the failure to include housing costs in a proper manner means that the cost of living in the Euro area has been severely understated. Today I have looked at the rise in mortgage costs over the past couple of years. But before that there were the rises in house prices driven by an official interest-rate of -0.5% and all the QE bond buying.

18 thoughts on “How the Euro area and ECB mislead people over the inflation numbers

  1. Hello Shaun,

    Well yes , we can agree that inflation measures such as CPI and RPI are approximations and cannot be single person specific.

    But then we have to ask ” how can we improve measurements to get a better picture? ”

    Well we can but those in charge of such things seem to have another objective in mind. Well they give that impression to me atleast.

    So we get CPI for certain government spending and RPI for others , with the RPI for taxation. All this we are told is because “great minds” are working mysteriously behind closed doors and we shouldnt raise our concerns in case we put them off their deliberations , or, as I’d put it , their nap. *

    * choosing the right after dinner wine to go with the sweet trolley or how big their pension pots will be.

    Frankly this has been going on far too long but I see no way how to break out of what is a long slow decline in all western economies.

    Why should they care? its ” I’m alright, Jack” for them.

    Forbin

    • Hi Forbin

      Every now and then the Euro area and ECB set up a review of housing costs. There was one around 2016/17 which I recall Andrew Baldwin and I following that rather fizzled out. Then Christine Lagarde launched a review when she started her ECB Presidency. Except as I am sure you have guessed nothing ever happened.

      So perhaps next year we will get another announcement of action and well you can guess the rest…

  2. Absolutely hilarious that as Shaun points out, they contradict their own lies with their own statistics!!!

    Thanks for looking posting the reply to my question yesterday, are you going to pursue it further?

    I note that crime statistics tody show there has been a 37% increase in shoplifting in the last year,snatch thefts and pickpocketing up 18%, robberies up 13%, knife crime was “surprisingly” up only 7%,

    But when not attacking white British people celebrating St.Georges day in London with batons and horses, and visiting people accompanied by a mental health nurse, being suspected of being mentally ill because they don’t go along with DEI/WOKE insanity, what are the police doing about it ?

    Well the figures again show actually less and less, resources as we all suspected, are being targeted at hate crimes, charge rates have plummeted from 16% in 2015 to 6% today, reports of public fear, alarm, distress(threats abuse, harassment – verbal or physical) led to 25% of suspects being charged - now? 3%.

    Like the figures for people dying suddenly, will the ONS to revise the way crime statistics are reported and calculated?.

    • “Like the figures for people dying suddenly, will the ONS to revise the way crime statistics are reported and calculated?.”

      Dont give them ideas !

  3. 765 euros (about £655 ) per month for housing costs – including utilities – seems remarkable low.

    I know it is an average across the EU, but it still seems vastly lower than the UK.

    Does anybody known if the figure is in the right ball park?

    • Well it is for them and those in the offical stats/government/financial sector bubble, the figure they quote is so utterly ludicrous that it completely discredits all their other statistics and calculations, but like our ONS and Bank of England who(apart from Shaun and us on here) questions it?

    • it probably is correct as vast numbers of folk in Greece, Italy and Spain as well as Eastern Europe pay very low rents by our standards. Northern Europe is of course more expensive. It just shows that average figures are meaningless.

      • I’ve been looking at rentals in Spain for some time, there is no way 765 euros represents anything like real rents and costs for the Spanish, here is a search for aapartments in Alicante, there are 1,877 for rent, restricting the search to max 500 euros reduces that to 147 apartments. Just look a them, they are awful, so the average Spaniard is not living in those, so they are paying a lot more than 500 euros amonth, add in all the other costs and it is considerably more than 765 euros.

        Italy and greece I don’t know, so I won’t comment.

        Just to comapre the situation in the US, here is Michael Bordenaro’s latest where he lists houses with $25,000 YEAR INSURANCE AND $48,000 TAX PA in Florida. That’s $73,000/£59,000 p.a.

        I’m sure the Fed is ready and waitng to jump in and bail this craziness out at the first sign of any correction.

        The reasons for the high insurance are mentioned but also the fact that if a policy holder even phones up the company they are insuured with or another company to ask aquestion abouut cover, their future premiums are loaded to reflect they are an increased risk!!!

        https://www.kyero.com/en/alicante-province-property-long-let-1l3?max_price=500&page=5&per_page=20&sort=popularity_desc

        • those apartments are quite reasonable by southern European standards and the agreed final rent will always be a lot less than advertised. I have visited apartments on the outskirts of Barcelona, where most folk live, and they were very basic. Most of Athens is like that as well.

    • Changed my computer and the last few days wasn’t able to log in.

      When I tried to re-register or change my password came against a brick wall with wordpress.

      Anyone else had the same problem this is the second time I had the same problem and ended up changing my username.

      Strangely things corrected themselves today which has left me puzzled.

      • you’ve upset google bots again, Back to the naughty step.

        In a serious note I have seen a greater than average censorship on yt and other media accounts today. Not just mine I hasten to add but I have been taking notes.

        Is something going down that I havent figured yet or am I just “lucky” ??

        Stay tuned !

        Forbin

        • I Think you’re on to something there Forbin, here is Simon who has had a video about the bias in tv adverts against white actors removed, I don’t think anyone can deny there is a deliberate policy of ensuring most charcters in tv adverts are now afro carribean, and yet yt removed his video.So why was it removed?

          I’m afraid he has weaseld his way out of it today producing a video justifying their decision on the grounds it is purely a business decision, not for censorship or denying free speech,so yt did it because they feared the loss in revenue from advertisers who would pull advertising because the content didn’t fit in with the current woke,LGBT<Trans/DEI agenda and uses an example of them not allowing anything offensive on grounds of race, anti semitism,paedophilia,murder,denying the holcaust, or praising Hiltler as being totally reasonable but then equally justifying the censorship of someone pointing out the fact- not an opinion – that nearly all adverts are now exclusively populated by afro carribeans as equally offensive! – you can’t have it both ways Simon!

          In the next video he noted Russell Brand’s ban who was earning £2m pa from his channel because he was acused of sexually inappropriate behaviour, the fact he produced large numbers of videos at the time pointing out the contradictions in covid policies and the likey alternative agendas behind the whole covid scam were probably the real reason. But did yt really think they would lose £2m pa from advertisiers in the event Brand would be found guilt, well no, there have been no cheges, yt abd Brand have lost $4m for rumours – guilty until proven innocent, and then when you are you still lose.But like Belfield and Barton, a very big warning to anyone even thinking about saying anything about the current system let alone criticse it.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuniaTcAXpo

      • forgot to add – cookies , you changed computers so what ever was recognised on the old one will give the heebee jeebeis to web sites but they should have popups

        and if popups are disabled then you wont see them .

        Os differences – mac , versions of windows , like 11 is crazy daft .

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.