China and its house price problem

This morning brought us up to date on an issue which has been concerning the Chinese authorities. It is the issue of inflation but not the more recent producer price one but the much more long-running issue of house prices. As 2021 has developed China has shown more signs of concern over this area and has moved to try to take some heat out of the situation. Or as CNBC reported last week.

The People’s Bank of China said in its first quarter monetary policy report that house prices must be kept stable, and emphasized that houses are for living, not speculation.

It must have been hard for them to write that as central bankers much prefer to concentrate on the wealth effects from higher house prices.

Reuters has crunched the numbers for us from the official spreadsheet.

New home prices in China rose at the fastest rate in eight months in April, according to data Monday, despite increased efforts by the government to tame the searing market and tackle an alarming rise in debt.

Average new home prices in 70 major cities rose 0.6% in April from the previous month, the fastest pace since August 2020 and up a notch from a 0.5% gain in March , according to Reuters calculations based on data released by the National Bureau of Statistics. .

Minds may well be focused in Beijing because it has the second fastest growth rate at 1.2% for the month and 10.1% for the year. Not everywhere grew as Mudanjiang saw a 0.1% fall leaving prices some 8.3 below last year but as a collective the position is below.

On an annual basis, new home prices hit an eight-month high of 4.8%, compared to a 4.6% increase in March.

Concerns over this have led to new measures.

This month, authorities in a dozen cities have stepped up their campaigns to drive speculators out of the property market, taking more targeted measures such as capping prices set by developers and preventing some real estate agencies from setting property prices. excessively high second-hand homes.

But if we look at the numbers the last couple of months suggest that things are picking up steam rather than slowing.

The Causes

Michael Pettis has pointed out that relatively property looks attractive.

With deposits at 0.35%, and government bonds yielding between 2.6-3.2% (1-year to 10-year), even low rental yields of roughly 2% make buying an apartment seem a good investment.

Looked at like that if you add in expected house price growth of even a few per cent per year then property looks good. Maybe as we have seen in the UK rent is to cover costs and the real game is hoped for price rises.

He then goes onto note not only the persistent nature of this but also the reason why macroprudential policies got abandoned in the past.

Beijing has been growling about surging real estate prices for years, and more than…ever recently, even threatening a real estate tax, but until regulators implement sharper-toothed measures — which of course if credible will almost certainly cause prices to fall — there is little they can do to prevent ever more speculation in Chinese real estate.

That is the issue with the so-called mactopru. It either does not work or it works so well it gets abandoned as authorities have no stomach for falling house prices.

As the South China Morning Post pointed out yesterday taxes are another possible alternative.

China’s latest move to introduce a controversial property tax represents a fresh crackdown on property speculation and a curb on runaway home prices, but analysts believe it is also an “inevitable” solution to help solve the nation’s debt crisis and ensure financial stability.

A new scheme, like many Western countries, would eventually cover ordinary Chinese households. At the moment, taxes and fees are mainly collected only at land auctions, or in the property development or trading process, with few additional costs for residential homeowners.

The trouble is that such things can be the equivalent of just around the corner for many years and in fact this has been like that.

Local Government

This is another problem because these have come to rely on the house price boom for revenue.

Local authorities rely heavily on land sales revenues, which have nearly tripled in the past 10 years to 8.4 trillion yuan (US$1.3 trillion) in 2020.

Guiyang, the capital city of the Western province of Guizhou, said its net revenues incurred from land sales totalled 61.7 billion yuan (US$9.6 billion) last year, while its general budget revenues were only 39.8 billion yuan.  (SCMP)

Of course property tax revenues could replace that but the house price industry appears in other parts of the economy as well.

Real estate has been a pillar industry since home privatisation in 1998, and despite repeated efforts to lower the reliance, it still accounted for 26.8 per cent of the national fixed-asset investment last year. ( SCMP)

Today’s update suggests that the heat remains on.

the investment in real estate development grew by 21.6 percent year on year, an average two-year growth of 8.4 percent. The floor space of commercial buildings sold reached 503.05 million square meters, up by 48.1 percent year on year with the average two-year growth of 9.3 percent; and the total sales of commercial buildings were 5,360.9 billion yuan, up by 68.2 percent year on year with the average two-year growth of 17.0 percent.

Also there is the issue for the banks and indeed shadow banks.

Outstanding real estate related loans, including lending to developers and mortgages for individuals, hit a high of 50 trillion yuan (US$7.7 trillion) at the end of March, accounting for 28 per cent of total outstanding loans.  (SCMP)

Comment

Many of these issues are familiar to us in the west and the commentary below from Think China actually seems to echo Japan.

In April 2018, renowned Chinese economist Fan Gang put forth the “six wallet theory” in response to a question from the audience in a CCTV2 TV programme (大讲堂). In a nutshell, according to this theory, if a typical couple wanted to buy a house, they would have to empty six wallets — that is, the kitties of their respective parents and grandparents besides their own. And this is just to pay for the down payment of the apartment!

So things were already too expensive before they rose further as we note “the bank of mum and dad” Chinese style which goes a generation further.

They go on to highlight an issue I have regularly made about the UK which is how the property market can crowd out other types of investment and hinder innovation.

But as I mentioned earlier, the down payment of an apartment can amount to millions of RMB. This amount of money could have been used to realise the entrepreneurial dreams of passionate youths instead.

The problem with acting to stop this is that China is trying to switch from production to consumption but the two-year numbers below tell us that is not going well.

In April, the total value added of the industrial enterprises above the designated size grew by 9.8 percent year on year, an average two-year growth of 6.8 percent………In April, the total retail sales of consumer goods reached 3,315.3 billion yuan, up by 17.7 percent year on year, an average two-year growth of 4.3 percent;

Pushing consumption higher often involves policies which also benefit house prices.

Next on the list comes demographics.

The average annual growth rate was 0.53% over the past 10 years, down from a rate of 0.57% between 2000 and 2010 – bringing the population to 1.41bn.

The results add pressure on Beijing to boost measures for couples to have more babies and avert a population decline.

The results were announced in a once-a-decade census, which was originally expected to be released in April.  (BBC)

Personally I think that is a good thing on quite a few grounds but it does come with implications.

China’s working-age population – which it defines as people aged between 16 and 59 – has also declined by 40 million as compared to the last census in 2010. ( BBC)

Can they solve all this? It will need to be unique as they are facing many of the problems of the western capitalist imperialists.

The Chinese way
Who knows what they know?
The Chinese legend grows
The Chinese way
Who knows what they know?
The Chinese legend grows ( Level 42)

Podcast

https://soundcloud.com/shaun-richards-53550081/notayesmanspodcast127

 

22 thoughts on “China and its house price problem

  1. Hello Shaun,

    The answer is purley political, economics be dammed .

    you set rates for the pool . one pool for mortgage lending – high rate . and the other pool for busness loans .

    forbin

  2. We are told that population demographics mean we can’t afford decent pensions.
    We are told that millions of jobs are set to be lost through automation.
    Anyone able to join up their thinking?

      • We have a winner!
        Well done Forbin!
        What else do we know about robots, & what they don’t require at the end of their working lives?

      • oh deary me , somebody doesn’t like robots to be tax !

        own up , who ever you are!

        robots SHOULD be taxed as if they are human workers

        no free lunch for the owners

        capitla costs to build sure tas free but once working there should be a tax cost for all the revinue lost

        I suggest at minium the lowest wage with NI emplyee and employers

        perhaps then who ever you are, you will admit humans are of some worth

        Forbin,

        PS: or admit you are a profiteer of the new industrial revolution .

  3. Here in the UK Rightmove say average property prices now a third of a million

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-9581753/Average-asking-prices-jump-5-700-month.html

    Demand for 3 and 4 bedroom houses continues and in the North West house price increases are circa in double digits and likely to rise further imo.

    Questrion on inflartion and “inputed rents” having listened to the latest podcast. Why dont the ONS replace inputed rents with mortgage payments ?

    As for China’s house price increase lerts face it if China is back making hay again so to speak then house price increases will follw.

    As for the rest of most other areas like Australia, New Zealand, UK, US, its still a very low interest rate envireoment and as such to buy a house is still better value than renting imo.

    Even a third of a million average house price cost is more affordable than renting in the UK subject to a reasonable deposit.

    Just saying !

  4. As the covid resrtictions start to ease the Chancellor is hoping we will go on a spending spree but todays footfall suggests this may not happen

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57141634

    Looks like all those billions of savings may be diverted into home improvements and the like including trading up the property ladder.

    One swallow doesnt make a summer but shoppijg habits may have changed forever and the public realised how much money they can save not visiting the High Street.

    All those people who worked in towns and cities have realized they can save considerable money styaing at home and avoiding train journeys, car costs, lunches etc.

    • Hi Peter

      I do not know what the weather was like in your area today but it did not encourage people to go out in Battersea. As well as plenty of rain we had hail stones and 2 bursts of lightning and thunder. So we will find out more when the weather is better.

  5. Hello Shaun,

    The world over we see that excess liquidity spills out into presumably safe havens of brick and mortar.

    But I still contend this is a great misallocation of money – betting on house price rises and stocks takes away from productive investement.

    Presumably because there’s going to issues in that end of the economy …..

    Forbin

  6. BOE Vlieghe more downbeat on the UK economy and on interest rates

    LONDON (Reuters) – Sharp economic growth in Britain this year should not be confused with a normal boom, given the amount of ground lost last year during the coronavirus pandemic, Bank of England policymaker Gertjan Vlieghe said on Monday.

    Vlieghe reiterated BoE forecasts that inflation was likely to overshoot its 2% target later this year, due to temporary bottlenecks and base effects, but stressed the BoE would look to the medium term when setting interest rates.

    “The fact that we’re going to have, or we’re likely to have, temporarily high growth rates and temporarily high inflation in the coming months, is not the main concern of monetary policy,” Vlieghe said at an event hosted by King’s College London’s Qatar Centre for Global Banking and Finance.

    “Instead, monetary policy will focus on returning to inflation sustainably to its target, which requires focusing on the medium term outlook,” he added.

    Britain’s economy shrank almost 10% last year, its biggest slump in more than 300 years, but official unemployment has barely risen due to a government furlough programme.

    Vlieghe said the economy would need to grow very rapidly over the coming months to absorb the millions of workers whose furlough payments are scheduled to end by Sept. 30.

    This week British pubs and restaurants can resume serving customers indoors for the first time in months. But Prime Minister Boris Johnson warned last week that a new Indian variant of COVID could derail plans for a full lifting of restrictions planned for late June.

    Vlieghe said he still believed that quantitative easing bond purchases were likely to offer only limited economic stimulus while long-term interest rates remained very low. Instead, he welcomed the fact the BoE would soon be able to cut interest rates below zero if needed.

    Vlieghe’s term as an external member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee expires on Aug. 31.

    (Reporting by David Milliken, editing by Andy Bruce)

    • Hi Peter

      I take away 2 things from that.

      He has the opposite view to the US Federal Reserve who is concentrating on the here and now.

      ““Instead, monetary policy will focus on returning to inflation sustainably to its target, which requires focusing on the medium term outlook,” he added.”

      Also that in the next recession interest-rates in the UK will go negative.

      “Instead, he welcomed the fact the BoE would soon be able to cut interest rates below zero if needed.”

  7. Great blog and podcast as usual, Shaun.
    Your blog related to house price inflation in China, your podcast started with house price inflation in the US and Britain, but it has become a big problem in countries all over the world. On May 13, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem gave a speech on, of all things, “The benefits of an inclusive economy.”. However the press conference that followed showed the reporters were largely uninterested in his topic du jour, and were more interested in inflation. WSJ reporter Kim Macrael asked him why a tangential reference in his speech to quantitative easing mentioned QE increasing the value of assets in registered retirement savings plans, but ignored the big increase in housing prices since QE started. In March the 11-city-composite of the Teranet National Bank HPI shows an inflation rate of 10.8%, up from 9.8% in February. Macklem acknowledged that housing price inflation was substantial, but denied that it was all due to the impact of QE. Another question about whether the Bank of Canada should have a dual mandate like the US Fed, an employment goal as well as an inflation target, led him to expand on the options for change in the 2021 renewal agreement to be announced in October. He had kind words for the US Fed’s average-inflation targeting regime without committing himself to adopt it. On the other hand, the man who as Research Director of the Bank of Canada in 2001 was instrumental in taking the mortgage interest cost index out of the operational guide, had absolutely nothing to say about changing the target inflation indicator to give housing prices more influence. Simply removing the mortgage interest cost index, with a -6.3% inflation rate in March, would give a greater relative importance to the replacement cost of depreciation, at 7.9%, and raise the overall inflation rate from 2.2% to 2.5%. This target inflation indicator would be very similar to the old RPIX series that was the original target inflation indicator of the Bank of England, except in terms of how elementary aggregates are calculated it would be more like the RPIJ for All items excluding mortgage interest. This would not, of course, be ideal, but it is as much of a reform as could reasonably be expected for this year.

    • Hi Andrew and thank you

      The same issue is affecting so many countries right now. The problem with mortgage costs in an inflation target is that the central bank directly influences them hence the use of RPIX in the UK back in the day. Taking them out of the inflation measure that is targeted in Canada would improve it as you say.

      What if the weight for mortgage costs was added to the depreciation weight?

      • Thank you for your interest, Shaun. The 2017 expenditure share for mortgage interest at link month December 2018 prices is 3.57% and for the replacement cost of depreciation component it is 5.14%. Complicating this is that the other owned accommodation expenses component has a weight of 1.95%. Part of that weight is mortgage interest and replacement cost of depreciation on secondary homes, like cottages. This would maybe bring those weights up to 3.80% and 5.47%. These are guesstimates, not estimates. StatCan could provide actual data but the importance of the adjustment is not great. At one time, mortgage interest had a higher weight than the replacement cost component. This has changed in our era of low interest rates and inflated housing prices.

  8. Pingback: China and its house price problem - Enri$hed Feed

  9. Pingback: China and its house price problem – Jai Jodhpur

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.