Germany is facing deindustrialisation caused by its own energy policies

A rise in energy costs is an especially big issue if you are an exporting manufacturer. The issue is in play for my subject of yesterday Japan, but when one thinks about it the classic case is Germany. We have been observing this for a couple of years now but it has taken a while for it to become accepted elsewhere. Even the Financial Times is on the case these days.

German industry is unlikely to recover to pre-Ukraine war levels as elevated prices from imported liquefied natural gas have put Europe’s largest economy at a “disadvantage”, the chief of one of Germany’s leading energy companies has warned.
“Gas prices in continental Europe, especially in Germany, are structurally higher now, because we, in the end, depend on LNG imports,” said Markus Krebber, chief executive of RWE. “The German industry has a disadvantage.”

The Financial Times then has a go at some interesting framing.

His comments come as European gas prices have plummeted 90 per cent from the record levels seen in 2022 and dipped briefly to levels last seen before the energy crisis, spurring questions about the extent to which industrial demand will recover.

Although it soon crumbles.

However, despite the sharp declines in the gas market, the European benchmark sits above pre-crisis averages, almost two-thirds higher than at the same time in 2019, according to commodities pricing agency Argus.

This is something that features in the Transitory inflation debate as there was an issue pre the Ukraine war. It suits the establishment to claim there was not as it provides an excuse for their failures. Let me illustrate this from the Federal Statistics Office report for January 2022 which was before the war.

Especially the rise in energy product prices (+20.5%) was markedly higher than overall inflation (December 2021: +18.3%). Motor fuel prices increased 24.8% and household energy prices 18.3%, year on year. Among household energy products, price rises were recorded especially for heating oil (+51.9%), natural gas (+32.2%) and electricity (+11.1%).

So it was already a problem and there are a couple of sacred cows here too. For example you do not have to be a fan of Donald Trump to see that he was right about this.

Germany had to wean itself off natural gas supplies from Russia after Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine as it became apparent that the Kremlin was using energy exports as a geopolitical weapon.

Plus under the editorial regime of Lionel Barber the Financial Times made Angela Merkel its person of the year in 2015.

Echoing criticism in Germany over the country’s energy policy, Krebber said then-chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision in 2011 to shut down its nuclear fleet without replacing the fuel with another energy source aside from Russian pipeline imports was a “mistake”.

Even if we step forwards to now we see that the German government seems determined to sell its industry down the river.

Berlin maintains that it is pouring money into transitioning the economy, positioning it for major future competitive advantages in a carbon-neutral world.

What competitive advantages are they? After all industry is already leaving.

Samantha Dart, head of natural gas research at Goldman Sachs, sees permanent closures of industrial capacity in Europe that will not come back.

It seems clear where at least some are going.

German companies announced a record $15.7bn in capital commitments to US projects last year, up sharply from $8.2bn a year earlier, dwarfing any other foreign destination, according to data from fDi Markets, a Financial Times subsidiary.

Number Crunching The Impact

One way of looking at it is below.

Gas demand from Europe’s industrial sector was down 24 per cent last year from 2019 levels, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights. The firm expects 6 to 10 per cent of the continent’s gas consumption to have disappeared forever due to demand destruction.

Plus if this survey is any guide more will be on its way.

A survey by the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry last September found that 43 per cent of large industrial companies were planning to relocate their operations outside of Germany, with the US being the top destination.

Such has been the interest that the Federal Statistics Office compiled a special report.

If you look at the different industrial sectors, you can see that the production of chemical products requires the most energy. Metal production and processing also requires large amounts of energy.

Putting it another way there is this.

The five industrial sectors with the highest energy consumption together required 77% of total industrial energy consumption in 2021, while their share of gross industrial value added at factor costs was only 17%.

That makes them very vulnerable to price rises, because of the scale of the issue. Also as an aside there is another problem and a reason for the rise in food prices we have seen worldwide.

Natural gas is not only used for energy purposes, but more than a third of it is used as a raw material for the production of chemical products such as fertilizers.

It seems that The Rolling Stones were onto something.

It’s a gas, gas, gas

The impact at the time was put like this.

Since the beginning of 2022, production in energy-intensive industries has fallen almost continuously in 2022 and has therefore developed significantly weaker than the industry as a whole. From February 2022 to July 2023, production in energy-intensive industries fell by 16.7%.

Although apparently that is okay or something like that.

 During the same period, total industrial production only fell by 2.8%. The energy-intensive industries, with their significant declines, do not appear to have a significant impact on the development of overall industrial production.

The Future is Bright

If we look wider then a rescue is at hand.

In the long-run, the Commission says the Green Deal will nonetheless have a positive effect, boosting EU competitiveness by creating jobs in eco-friendly sectors. ( EuroNews)

I am being the online equivalent of tongue-in-cheek as we know that politicians are only interested in the short-term. So any reference to the long-run evokes images of the phrase “Jam Tomorrow”. Such thoughts immediately hit trouble with those who would make the jam.

As the EU changes the way goods are produced and consumed, there will undoubtedly be job losses, and recent protests by farmers across Europe are a stark example of the real fear surrounding the green transition. ( EuroNews)

The whole piece has a German link in that it is a piece on President Von der Leyen’s attempt to serve a second term. Indeed she could have written it as somehow it omits that there is a common theme in all the failure on her watch which is her.

But for our purposes today we again have a German politician pursuing the same failed energy strategy.

Comment

This issue comes at us in a variety of ways. Here is the Financial Times from another article.

Big investors are selling US Treasuries and buying European government bonds, betting that cooler inflation in Europe will allow its central bank to start cutting interest rates sooner than the Federal Reserve.

As the main European bond market is Germany that is good in isolation. But the bigger picture is bad because you are betting the the European economies will continue to under perform.

The shift comes as the US and European economies have begun to diverge, with softer inflation and a weaker economy in Europe fuelling bets that the ECB will deliver more cuts than the Fed this year.

Of course that whole issue is rather toxic for past views at the FT.

Finally let me add something from my own thinking which is that there is a problem with the analysis of the Federal Statistics Office above. They are following the conventional view of smooth demand and supply curves and saying not much has happened. But in the real world these things take time along the lines of how people respond to change “Anger then Denial” and so on.

Thus some businesses will be hanging on and it is how long prices remain high that will also feed in? Over time more will fold. As to the latest news it raises the stakes.

European natural gas is expected to be more expensive through next winter amid persistent uncertainty about supply risks, including remaining flows from Russia ( @business)

 

 

 

 

 

18 thoughts on “Germany is facing deindustrialisation caused by its own energy policies

  1. Great blog as usual, Shaun.

    I am a fan of Orange Man, and really hope he becomes the Republican Grover Cleveland, but one of the things that least became his presidency was his obdurate opposition to the completion of the Nordstream 2 pipeline. John Foster, in “Canadian Dimension”, gives a good analysis of the early stages of American opposition to Nordstream 2:

    https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/nord-stream-2-pipelinea-saga-of-intrusion

    He notes: “One of President Trump’s last acts the day before leaving office was to expand US sanctions against Nord Stream 2. He targeted the Russian pipe-laying vessel Fortuna, a Russian oil tanker and two Russian companies under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017.” Frau Merkell was not a great German chancellor, but she was a strong supporter of the Nordstream 2 pipeline being built. She spoke Russian herself, and realized that a healthy German economy was difficult to achieve without normal relations with Russia, the other large economy in continental Europe. Trump is an America Firster and was trying, in a bullying fashion, to provide a market for American fracked gas. However, to his credit, he is not an unindicted war criminal, like Joe Biden, who blew up Nordstream 1 and Nordstream 2.

    Thanks largely to Tucker Carlson’s interview with Putin, virtually everyone now knows that Nordstream 2 has been repaired and is ready to send natural gas to Germany for the first time. If the German government is thinking of the welfare of its people, it should be eager to make it happen. The NATO security pact should not be an economic suicide pact for the Germans.

    • Hi Andrew and thank you.

      One of the first casualties of war is the truth so it is said. Thus we may find that who blew up Nordstream is something debated for some years.

      It is awkward to say the least to be supporting Ukraine and financing Russia via buying its gas. After all the EU is doing quite a lot for Russia as it is.

    • One problem with the Orange Man is his abject ignorance of world affairs ., as Fiona Hill remarked, he couldn’t get his head around the fact that Ukraine was an independent state. 

      • Thank you for your reply, Eric. I’m not sure that’s true. I’ve seen videos with Fiona Hill. She struck me as just another neo-con warmonger. Of course, Ukraine is an independent state, and it will remain so, whoever wins the next US election. I must admit I was disappointed today when I watched Trump’s press conference, where the main topic was supposed to be election integrity. He was asked about $60B more in military aid to Ukraine and he said he would prefer that they got the money as a loan not as aid. Good grief! When it comes to the Russo-Ukrainian War he doesn’t sound much like J.D. Vance, unfortunately. He lacks J.D.’s detailed knowledge of the issue and his moral clarity. However, J.D. Vance isn’t running for president, and he is a big Trump supporter. We all should be, considering the alternative.

          • Thank you, Eric. I read what you sent me and then went and listened to an interview with Fiona Hill in February 2024:

            https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2024/02/23/amanpour-hill-ukraine-anniversary.cnn

            She is a bona fide Russia expert but it doesn’t change my view that she is essentially just another virulent NATO war hawk. To take the conversation back to economics a little, notice that when she speaks of Tucker Carlson’s interview with Putin, she never speaks about Putin’s contention that Russia had the largest economy in Europe. This is according to the World Bank. It is at least the second largest after Germany, which is where the IMF still ranks it. I don’t know what her own views are, but the American neo-cons are notorious for using nominal GDP estimates to rank economies, which is where we get those ridiculous statements that the Russian GDP is less than the Texan GDP (J.R. McMaster), or about the same size as the Benelux countries (Anne Applebaum) or whatever. A lot of them actually seem to believe this, which is probably how we got here in the first place. I think she is guilty of projection when she says that Putin is willing to fight the war to the last Ukrainian. It is the US neo-cons who are willing to fight the war to the last Ukrainian, and they should be ashamed of themselves.

  2. If Germany is in trouble now. wait until the full implications of the lates ECHR ruling are realised.

    The ECHR has ruled that Climate Change is a human rights issue – hence Governments must stop Climate Change.

    I guess that they do not mean there is a right to warmer sunnier days, more likely they mean colder winter days, without gas heating or electricity.

    Their judgement will also mean less industry and jobs in Germany and the rest of Europe.

    Even more worrying, it means Government by unelected Judges – bye, bye democracy.

    • Hi Nickvii

      I think that politicians have been very lazy in how they have delegated power to the courts which have a habit of being captured as described so well in Yes Minister. Is there a German version?

      As you say it is really bad news for democracy as on big issues like this they should definitely be decided by those who have been elected and thus voted out.

  3. Pingback: Germany is facing deindustrialisation caused by its own energy policies – NewZealand Times

    • US CPI for year to March was 3.5%, core was 3.8% same as February, but analysts expected it to be 3.7%.

      SO will inflation fighter and man of the people Powell cut rates later this year? – you bet he will.

      I just don’t know how they are going to keep this pig in the air until November, but I’m sure Yellen will do the business.Then watch out below when Trump moves in.

  4. Meanwhile over here, British consumers have got so used to paying for soaring foodstuffs that they are almost accept them now, according to Tescos boss who today reportd an ALMOST TREBLING OF PRE-TAX PROFIT FROM LAST YEARS £882M TO £2,300M, on sales up only 4.4%, amazing! just how do they do it!

    It just proves what we are being told every day by economists. politicains and journalists – inflation is good for us!

    Lest anyone think they weren’t sharing those vast spoils with their poor down-trodden workers they have generously – no I think recklessly – awarded them the equivalent of a 1.5% bonus – taxable of course! Average payout will be in the region of £300, so after tax and NI shall we say just over £220???

    And as I keep pointing out on here, many do not care how much things cost, he reported strong sales in their premium ready meals such as Tescos own range – “Tescos Finest”,and is very optimistic for prospects in the year ahead!

    Who says capitalism doesn’t work? I wonder how much five slices of ham will cost next year? I think by then, the workers will be just about able to afford to buy one pack per week with their massive bonus and treat themselves to a sandwich EVERY WEEK!!! Luxury.

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/10/tesco-says-grocery-inflation-has-lessened-as-it-plans-500m-efficiency-savings

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68776913

  5. It’s not a surprise to me and I discussed the expectation of extraordinary profits, on this forum, several months ago. Watch what profit the big food companies report in future!

    • Hi Pavlaki

      It will be interesting to see what “price gouging” has gone on. I went to one of the bigger Tesco’s the other day as you get a better choice than the one by Battersea Park. But they have raised the price of their Farmhouse loaf which I like by 10p. I bought a different one as whilst I enjoy it I felt that raising the price again was taking advantage.

  6. Pingback: Dear Germans, greetings from your Green Government | Evocatively Ambiguous

  7. I am far from sure that the deindustrialisation of Germany is due to its own energy policies ; I think it has more to do with the eastward expansion of NATO.

    14 ex-soviet republics, or ex-Warsaw Pact countries, or countries formerly aligned to Moscow joining NATO is too many for Putin. For Putin the fall of the USSR was traumatic enough, but the idea of a 15th (Ukraine) and 16th (Georgia) joining NATO was simply too much.

    In 2008 George Bush was warned that US support for Ukraine joining NATO would provoke Putin. Germany was against Ukraine joining NATO.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/fiona-hill-advised-bush-against-supporting-ukraine-nato-bid-but-he-ignored-2022-4?op=1

    16 years later we have a war raging that Putin is determined not lose (IMHO); whatever the cost.

    The effect on the German economy is permanent; there’s no going back now. The days of cheap power from Russia are gone and will never return.

    Hopefully Putin will settle for a draw – a negotiated settlement that includes a non-aligned Ukraine (what’s left of it).

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.